182
New York Republicans push to expel Santos over new charges
(www.axios.com)
Jesus fucking McDonald's has a better background check then Congress.
I wasn't sure where to put the commas in your statement, and now I can't unread "Jesus, fucking McDonald's, has..."
I read it like McDonald's was Jesus' last name.
Jesus F. McDonalds
If some of the D's want to get rid of Menendez, and some of the R's want to get rid of Santos, can't we just do like a prisoner exchange type of thing? One vote, both heads on the chopping block, one from each side leaves the overall total basically the same. The R's can claim they only voted to kick out Menendez, and the D's can claim they only voted to kick out Santos, we get rid of the two most blatant fraudsters, and everyone's constituency is still mostly ok with it as long as the other side lost a guy too.
Menéndez is a Senator while Santos is a ~~Congressman~~ House Representative. Wouldn't work out.
You mean Representative. They're both congressmen.
Oh shidd. Thank you. I guess elementary school social studies class was a long time ago.
Worth a shot. Dems are going to kick their dude out anyway because they have or pretend to have morals.
It would be more fair for a 4-1 exchange, since there’s many fewer senators. Somehow it’s still tough picking only 4.
Well balls. So much for my amazing idea to save democracy.
Let them fight. There can be only one.
Every crime is legal in the republican party, except stealing from the politicians stealing from Republicans.
I thought Anthony D’Esposito was one of his many names for a second, so I was wondering if this was like a battle between multiple personalities or something.
(Anthony Devolder is the name I was thinking of.)
Took their time...
They need to let their donators know that they view stealing from a donator as completely unacceptable
About damn time.
The only two House members expelled in the past 150+ years were both only removed after they were convicted of crimes (James Traficant and Michael Myers).
There is a pretty long tradition in Congress that members are not expelled after indictment, only after conviction.
Of course a strong leader pressures their members into resigning when faced with such overwhelming evidence of wrongdoing (Pelosi twisted Anthony Weiner's arm so damn hard he probably couldn't play with himself for months). But Qevin couldn't do that, and neither will Scalise.
If Santos had half a brain he'd be instructing his lawyers to negotiate the best possible plea deal... not grandstanding in Trumpian defiance. But I doubt that the House will vote to oust him prior to a conviction.
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
182 points (97.9% liked)
politics
18973 readers
3987 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS