this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
295 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
3622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Intel might have slipped that Windows 12 is indeed coming next year | Company CFO sees benefits of a coming "Windows Refresh"::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrBungle@lemmy.ca 123 points 1 year ago (3 children)

new versions of windows just kind of feel like new phones now. It's good but.. who cares?

I can remember as a teen and upgrading from windows 98 to XP felt like jumping into the future.
Or, more recently, getting the first samsung galaxy after having a basic candybar phone.

Just seems like more of the same all while charging an arm and a leg for it.

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Then xp to vista happened and it looked pretty but was unusable. Then 7 came out and it solved all the BS and was a relief. Then 8 came out and it looked pretty but was unusable. Nobody is quite sure what happened with 9 but 10 was ok I guess, better than 8. Then I started using Linux because I was sick of the bullshit.

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

9 was skipped because there was concern with old/lazily coded programs running in compatibility mode for Windows 9x versions.

Basically, when the windows versions went from Win95/98/ME to 2000 and XP, some lazy programmers went “well by the time Windows 2090 rolls around I’ll be dead” and just had their programs check the windows version for a 9 when deciding whether or not to run in compatibility mode. If it detected a 9, then it would run in compatibility for 95/98/ME.

Microsoft wanted to avoid this potential issue, so they just skipped version 9 altogether and jumped straight to 10.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unrelated but didn't a lot of things about that time skip a few versions to land at 10? Like I don't think there was an iPhone 9 and so on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Regarding why they just jumped to 10, I subscribe to the theory that enough software that required XP or greater checked for OS compatibility by looking for the string "Windows 9*" to catch both 95 and 98

[–] 601error@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Funny thing. The reputation of Vista is universal, so I don't doubt it at all. However, I ran Vista starting from beta and never had a problem with it. I must have had the magic hardware combination that worked. My least favourite Windows release was 8.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 98 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Isn't windows 11 still... unfinished?

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Everything is unfinished in Microsoft world. Not even joking.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not thinking about upgrading until W11 is 50-60% market share and they actually have to take bugs seriously

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I bought a Dell XPS for work with a 12th gen Intel Evo CPU that came with Windows 11 and it ran like absolute dog shit. Slow, poor battery life, etc. I reinstalled 11 from scratch with an MS ISO to remove any Dell bloatware and it was actually worse. I ran the "old" Windows 10 Media Creation Tool and downgraded (through the upgrade option, ha) and it has been running great for months ever since. The Evo platform isn't even supposed to work fully on 10, and definitely not run faster or with better battery life. That's the inverse of what should have happened. Also, the bugs went away and I got a functional Windows Explorer back without having to pay for fucking third-party start menu software.

E: clarity

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 62 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As long as 10 is supported, I'm not updating. At least I'm not hammered with ads like on 11.

If 10 is sunset, I'll probably switch back to Linux. I rarely game on my laptop anyway.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of like 1000 games I can play about 997 on linux, you'll probably be fine on linux even gaming now

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand Linux, but gaming on my steam deck is amazing and occasionally runs games better than my much more powerful windows computer.

Certain things do run better on Linux. So if a game heavily relies on one of those things, it’ll run better. But there’s still a lot of game engine stuff that is experimental or just plain non-functional on Linux, so the games that utilize those are basically unplayable.

Until fairly recently, things like Ray tracing and DLSS were windows-only, because they almost universally used DirectX, which is a windows API.

[–] SecureTaco@lemmy.asc6.org 28 points 1 year ago

Microsoft already announced Windows 10 will no longer be supported in Oct 2025

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you game via Steam, there's a good chance you can use their Proton layer to play Windows games on Linux.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (18 children)

My gaming rig is linux and it’s only sorta inconvenient

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (11 children)

windows 11 isnt even the majority of installs yet and they're trying to push for windows 12? They tried doing "windows as a service" with Windows 10 but that never really manifested either.

I know people whine that Linux users always harp on about Linux, but there's a better alternative to having a £100 tax on every new laptop you buy, or having to buy a new license every time you upgrade a PC a little too much in one go. Or being locked out of security updates because you dont want to subject your system to adware.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And with the Steam Deck entering the picture, we have a huge company like valve making it even easier to jump ship now. Its the ship jump I used

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft might be leaning into an old reputation. Windows 95 was crap, Windows 98 fixes it. Windows ME was crap, Windows XP fixes it. Windows Vista was crap, Windows 7 fixes it.

They might be expecting that people think Windows 11 was crap in the same way Windows ME or Vista was crap, and they'll flock to Windows 12. But it's not like Windows 11 is horribly broken like that. The actual problem is that Windows 11 doesn't give many compelling reasons to upgrade over 10, and it has a bunch of useless bloat.

As a developer, having WSL2 open up X11 apps without having to jump through hoops of running an X server on Windows is quite nice. Other than that, I don't know why I'd bother.

[–] ArdMacha@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

In actuality 98 was crap until SE and XP was crap until SP2.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I haven't even bothered "upgrading" to windows 11 because it still looks terrible.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My work computers have it installed so I use it all the time it's not bad, it just doesn't bring anything good to the table. It's basically a visual update.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, but I dislike the visual update.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The one thing I love is the new snapping options of you hover over the maximize button.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see no compelling reason to accept this "upgrade."

[–] Contort3860@links.hackliberty.org 18 points 1 year ago (8 children)

That's why it'll end up beig forced on people. Just like what's happened with 11. And 10 before it. Didn't happen to everyone, but there were lots of complaints about it happening.

[–] RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If it's forced and also needs a subscription, quite a lot of people will leave for the alternatives.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

A new version of windows coming next year isn’t really shocking news.

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But Windows 10 was supposed to be the last version, they said so. 🙄

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (11 children)

It was for me.

I use Arch btw.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fucking fix your bloated background service's, every update they add more and more services and background applications that serve little purpose, like the touch screen service that's running on my fucking desktop that only has a mouse and keyboard

[–] Lemmyvisitor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

another thing that annoyed me was the useless setting page, when control panel worked fine.

especially since you end up needing to get to control panel to do anything anyway

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I wonder if they will provide a "Windows 13" after that.

And another thing in Windows I am waiting for is the moment when they encrypt all your data "for security", then blackmail you into a subscription service where you can only access your files while you pay your monthly dues. And how long it will take for this being hacked in a way that hackers, microsoft, and the relevant government agencies can all read your data, and you can not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any bets on this Refresh not supporting 8th-gen and below Intel chips except the Surface Studio for “reasons”?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spiderkle@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

rumored to be an enterprise tier "windows in the cloud" solution . But that doesn't mean there won't be an offline solition personal OS where u have basic functionality with ads on the desktop. If you know win11 and xbox new startmenus, expect more of those unmovable ad spots...sorry recommendations

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

~~windows refresh~~ cash grab

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Thank god my PC doesn't have a TPM.

Otherwise, I am just waiting for some industrial software to be usable on Linux (they're migrating now!) so I can finally drop Windows for good.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If not 12, an incremental patch release to 11 as a "revamp" version they've done with all the others, but no significant changes. Meh.

load more comments
view more: next ›