10
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dekekun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Does this mean they're finally committing to the rebuild?

Imagine if they get 1OA the year after bedard and it's a bust.

[-] Gigloo@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

This could mean the opposite. This gives them more money to spend now, and one less unreliable D.

They are probably going to do the Canucks thing where they sign or trade for some other low impact player.

[-] grunt@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t think so. It feels like they want a quick two season type of rebuild to make some playoff money. The way they ended last season and traded a number one showed that.

[-] MyNameIsSkittles@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No they aren't rebuilding, they are trying to become playoff/cup run ready as soon as possible. That's why they dumped OEL and are signing on reclamation projects like Bear

[-] VeryAverageChef@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I doubt it. Every time a Canucks rebuild is brought up it's also mentioned that ownership has no interest in a rebuild. I think I remember Friedman saying that they are concerned that attendance would dip pretty hard during a rebuild

[-] Sampson7185@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Another fantastic move by the Canucks, what an absolute brain trust running that team

That trade was terrible from the start and it was incredibly obvious to everyone but the Canucks front office/ownership.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Hockey

2262 readers
2 users here now

Rules

List of Team-Specific Communities:

Metropolitan Division

Atlantic Division

Central Division

Pacific Division

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS