this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
23 points (68.3% liked)

World News

32321 readers
890 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There was a post from a mass media site the other day saying Turkey was approving Sweden to join NATO. This turned out to be a bit of wishful thinking.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] patchymoose@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Just want to note that the link is an opinion piece, not a news article.

[–] sjatar@sjatar.net 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a citizen from Sweden this is all on Erdogan now. I don't think we should agree to any more requirements. Just playing it out for political gain.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a citizen from Turkey, sorry about that. We tried to vote him out, just didn't take.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As another Swedish citizen, I’m also sorry. The stuff he’s done to your economy is soul crushing, and that’s barely scraping the top of it. I’m really glad my friend moved away from there, but I feel for everyone who can’t.

I hope things get better over there eventually.

[–] sjatar@sjatar.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks <3 Yeah I was following the election, crazy close to getting him out. No idea how people wanted him still in power after the earthquake disasters. Feels like he used the anger towards Sweden (after the danish guy burned the Quran) to gain some votes by refusing us. What a mess it has become.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Did they not know that Quran burning was propaganda? It happened, but it happened specifically to split Sweden from Turkey. I think it was discovered the person was working for Russia.

[–] Ooops@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why would Turkish media tell them? They are controlled by Erdogan (where public tv reports about the election didn't even mention his opponent by name... he was just "that other guy").

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 4 points 1 year ago

Most folk in Turkey can't consume media from outside sources as they (genuinely) lack the language skills. Turkish media is either just tabloids or state owned propoganda.

[–] sjatar@sjatar.net -1 points 1 year ago

Well not sure about that, the Danish guy that did it have been doing similar things for a while. So while maybe it was somehow encouraged I'm sure he could have gotten the brilliant idea himself. What a genius display of free speech it was...

[–] tal@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/07/14/7411332/

16:55 Erdoğan says Putin agrees with him on "Grain deal" renewal

17:28 Kremlin denies having agreed to prolong grain initiative

Erdogan appears to be busy all over.

[–] alexius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Legit question. What would be the tangible benefits of joining NATO?

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Security in numbers from terrorist countries like russia

[–] alexius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really wanna know the opinion of a citizen of Sweden, the decision is about them. Do you currently consider Russia a threat to Sweden? It seems to me that they’re depleted after invading Ukraine and more or less failing. Would NATO not intervene in a hypothetical russian invasion of Sweden because of this vote?

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would you prefer a fight like Ukraine's (even if you win), or would you rather make sure the fight never happens?

It's clear Putin doesn't care about Russians dying. They've always just thrown blood at their targets.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

How many Ukrainians have described their own battlefield as a "meatgrinder"?

[–] alexius@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m worried at some aspects of your comment that seem xenophobic in nature. Most Russians disagree with the decision to attack Ukraine and even a dictator like Putin can’t pull the string forever without breaking it. We already saw the consequences of him having to rely on mercenaries a couple weeks ago. He had to rely on them because there are not enough people willing to fight. So russians in general aren’t some zombies or pawns, we shouldn’t look at them that way.

On the other hand, I don’t see a real risk of Russia invading Sweden, and don’t even consider NATO’s response to a Russian’s hypothetical threat of invasion to another country to be the same, so in the end, while they didn’t get to join, I think they can move on without any damage and try joining later when conditions change. They’ll still be de facto protected.

[–] Waldhuette@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Your comment is really weird. You are arguing about something the person you are replying to didn't even say.

They didn't say most Russians agree with the war. They also didn't say Russians are zombies or pawns.

All they said was that Russian (Soviet union) leaders have a history of sacrificing their own citizens. That's an undeniable fact.

And stating that is in no way xenophobic.

[–] alexius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

In my view, the comment implies that Russia invading Sweden is a decision that falls solely on Putin’s will. How is that not something that reduce russians to pawns or zombies, or them being ok with whatever war their leader instructs? They are invisible to the commenter, and that’s disturbing to me, honestly.

Of course Putin is unable to start yet another war. He’s only partially getting away with Ukraine, and even with years of planning and propaganda, he’s struggling to stay in it, and is relying heavily in straight up mercenaries who may or may not be russian, they’re just hired assassins.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It's probably ChatGPT.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm xenophobic because Putin doesn't care about Russian lives?

[–] alexius@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

An entire comment for you to read explaining why, but you got instatriggered and lashed out.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NATO is a defensive alliance that only defends (counterattacks) when attacked. If Sweden is not in NATO and attacked by ruzzia terrorists, they'd be supported in the same way Ukraine is being supported now. If in NATO and attacked by ruzzia, ruzzia would be instantly flattened by NATO.

[–] sjatar@sjatar.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The idea was that Sweden and Finland would enter NATO togheter. Finland bordering Russia is by far the biggest argument for them and Sweden also semi borders Russia by ocean access.

This discussion was brought up early in the war when it was not clear how strong Russia was.

For me I don't see the point in joining anymore but was a bigger consideration early.

Though exiting the deal when Finland already joined would put a dent in our relations. Sad we will lose our decades of neutrality because of one dictator biting of more then they can chew, but so be it.

[–] alexius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for a comprehensive answer, i’m a firm believer that geopolitics shouldn’t be assumed from an outsider’s perspective. I truly appreciate that you took your time to explain how this is understood by the people of Sweden instead of accusing me of things and downvoting my ass.

I agree with you in the aspect that it seems like Russia is not strong enough to pose a threat anymore, and understand how this feels like you were left out while Finland didn’t. Hopefully this decision doesn’t have a true impact in your lives and a military alliance isn’t ever needed for your safety.

[–] sjatar@sjatar.net 2 points 1 year ago

From the looks of it, Sweden will try until we get in most likely. Outside of a referendums to not join I don't see us backing down from it ^^ Not sure how a referendums would go. I'd bet on a very divided 50/50 vote.

load more comments
view more: next ›