251
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Oikio@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Finally migrated from Windows to Linux. For anyone wondering, what is the state of Linux as your primary OS for home PC\laptop in 2023.

I've finalised my Archlinux installation yesterday, I dropped of Linux more than 10 years ago and experience in 2023 in comparison is awesome and beyond even wildest dreams back then:

  • For average user looking for more out of the box experience I would suggest something Arch based (people in comments suggest EndeavourOS, please do your research). Archlinux installation took me quite some time
  • Almost everything works out of the box, by just installing corresponding package
  • KDE Plasma environment is fast and beautiful
  • Pipewire audio server (Jack\Pulseaudio replacement) works great
  • Wayland window server is not there yet, especially if you have Nvidia with proprietary drivers and want to use VR. Waking up, session restoration and other scenarios have issues. Use X11.
  • Wine is great!
  • Music making - Bitwig Studio DAW has linux native version, yabridge allow you to use windows VSTs, which are easily installed via wine
  • Gaming works out of the box with Steam for majority of titles, some games have native linux version. Performance is great. In worst case windows game might loose 5-15% in performance. Was not case for my titles
  • Gaming outside steam is fine too. Use Wine, Lutris, Proton
  • VR is a mixed bag. Not everything is there (Desktop view, sound control and mirroring, camera, motions smooth, lighthouses do not wake up os go to sleep. I use my phone to turn them on/off). But if its not the problem for you, quite some titles work. Tried: native HF Alyx, Lab, windows: Beat Saber and Boneworks. For me it's a surprise, I did not count on it. Performance is great.

So overall my experience is great. Eventually I'm going to get rid of WIndows on other computers and laptops at howe. I can finally wave goodbye to Windows, with lots of ads and bloatware. Alway glad to help with answers regarding installation while my memory and history logs are fresh. ^^

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 72 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't recommend Arch to Linux beginners, though. It'll take quite a bit of tinkering to get to work and you have to develop a pretty detailed understanding of the whole thing. Which is absolutely fine, of course, if this is what you want to do. But if you just want something that works with minimal hassle, try Mint.

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 45 points 1 year ago

Yes, I find this obsession with Arch on Lemmy very weird. It's certainly not a distro for beginners. Ubuntu (let the hate flow), Mint, Fedora, and many others would be better choices.

If it is what you like, fair enough but I feel that it is encouraged around here as a default for both beginners and advanced users, which is bizarre. It's too complex for beginners and not optimisable enough for very advanced users. I don't hate it but I hate to see it become the standard.

[-] the16bitgamer@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

From my personal experience Arch is several months ahead of other distros and depending on the package and sometimes has everything you need already included for gaming.

I believe this is due to the Steam Deck.

However for ease of use, I agree there are other better distros. Fedora is only 2ish months behind arch in terms of graphics drivers and Ubuntu… has the latest proton from steam and lutris since proton isn’t installed from the local app stores.

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Arch is several months ahead of other distros

Source for that? It's one of those weird, wild affirmations that go around regarding Arch. Ahead in terms of what? Integrating the most up-to-date kernel or something?

Is it because of the rolling release model? But it's not the only one to have rolling releases.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dallen@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

I find Mint to be the most obvious choice for beginners who don’t use Lemmy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 8 points 1 year ago

I had to help a friend install the VMware kernel modules, since VMware is weird and VirtualBox sucks for virtualising Windows. I had to guide him through it step by step, making sure his commands were exact.

He's only started using the terminal properly. Hell no, I'm not going to recommend Arch to him.

[-] FalseDiamond@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

It's because it's bleeding edge, extremely well documented and extremely popular. Bleeding edge is exciting and you're gonna end up on the arch wiki anyway regardless of distro, so you may as well go to the source.

Do mind though it doesn't mean it's easy, like at all, and I fundamentally agree, there's a million better choices for first timers.

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

you're gonna end up on the arch wiki anyway regardless of distro, so you may as well go to the source.

Absolutely not. I've never used a distro that required me to check the forums or wiki of another distro.

it's bleeding edge

What now? I feel I have fallen asleep and just woke up at a marketing meeting at my job.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I've ended up on the arch wiki a few times on non-arch distros, it covers many generic Linux tools very well

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

There is a certain kind of beginner I would recommend Arch to, those rare folks who really do learn best from the bottom up. Candidates must also see "computers" as a hobby, and have separate hardware from their daily driver they're installing/learning Linux on.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lemmy_nightmare@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Mint all the way

[-] nathris@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Endeavor OS solves most of those problems. Out of box experience is fantastic, and the installer is the best I've ever used.

That being said, I still wouldn't recommend it due to the Arch package maintainers willingness to break userspace.

You will do a system update and it will break something. Most recent for me was Python packages. I updated my system and suddenly pip stopped working because they decided to follow PEP-668 and force the user to install packages using pacman.

The rationale given was allowing the user to install packages outside of the distro's control can potentially break system tools like Fedora's DNF, which is python based.

Now, I've done this on Fedora, it's not fun. But you know what else? FEDORA DOESN'T EVEN ENABLE THIS FEATURE YOU FUCKING IMBECILES.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Arch is the one of the last things I'd recommend for an out of the box experience.

I'd recommend Fedora with Gnome if people are coming from iOS and KDE if people come from Windows.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

It's also one of the last things I'd recommend to someone migrating from Windows to Linux lol it has a fairly high learning curve

[-] Varixable@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Anecdotal, but I jumped straight into EndeavorOS from Windows 10 with very little knowledge about Linux before hand and it's been a very "it just works" out of the box experience for me.

Granted I just use my PC mainly for gaming, but outside of a few issues that were my own fault for not reading/doing any research before wiping my Windows install, its been an incredibly smooth experience.

[-] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

While I agree that overall it can be a smooth experience I'd say for the majority of people who are just coming to Linux I woukd rather recommend Linux Mint. Especially when someone doesn't know what they're doing at all yet.

Arch and its derivatives are cool dor tinkerers but realistically speaking if you're looking for stuff that works out of the box without hassle it's much much better to stick to distros like Linux Mint, Fedora, Pop_OS!, and similiar. Need the latest stuff? Flatpack or Fedora should be good, or Debian sid if you want a rolling release (tho realistically you won't really need a rolling release over semi-rolling if you're still a noob). Sure the AUR is cool but it's a bit overrated in the sense that unless you're actively looking for stuff on it 99% of the time you're using it because something isn't in the official repos and that's not good, while distros like Linux Mint have large repos with pretty much everything you need already without a real need for the AUR.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Chobbes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, something arch based is a really weird recommendation for beginners...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aard@kyu.de 22 points 1 year ago

especially if you have Nvidia

This is something that needs to be highlighted over and over again: Don't buy nvidia if there's ever a chance of running anything but Windows.

[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

Mmh. If you like Machine Learning / AI / Stable Diffusion you're kinda screwed. Hope AMD ups their game regarding this.

[-] raubarno@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

IDK, I used to have a dedicated software for playing with CUDA. Most of the image-specific AI stuff from the internet require 8 GB of VRAM or more, though.

Nowadays, I don't feel the need for GPU-accelerated computing, though. If I needed, I would write Vulkan compute shaders for that thing.

[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. Lots of frameworks are optimized for CUDA (Nvidia). ROCm (AMD) and Intel's efforts are a niche. Hence often cumbersome to set up and get all the performance out of it. Nvidia invests orders of magnitude more into AI. I believe they consider this to be the more profitable market in the future.

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Not really though, more like if you need open source drivers. Nvidia cards with the proprietary driver work great on OSes like Illumos (solaris) or FreeBSD, Linux on X11 where no other card works properly.

[-] relic_@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I would agree with this, I use Nvidia cards for professional work on Linux and I've never had a problem. Yeah there's some upfront work configuring the drivers, but I've never had it take more than an hour to setup.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago

For picking a distro, I'd rather recommend https://distrochooser.de instead of just saying "Arch or derivative". IMO it should be in the sidebar. Opinions @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml @nooter692@lemmy.ml @MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml ?

[-] SaladevX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Dang! DistroChooser is neat. I hadn’t heard of it before and it recommended Arch for me, which I’m already using (btw)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I agree with most of your statements, though not with all of them.

I'd say use X11, only if you're on nvidia and you've got 1 monitor or monitors with the same resolution and refresh rates and are ok with having to disable the X11 compositor and having no animations while playing games... You also have to be ok with tearing while gaming too... It's a lot, and the next version of plasma, plasma 6 is supposed to fix all the jankiness with kde on wayland, as afaik GNOME on wayland is stable on nvidia, I'm on AMD so I can't confirm though...

EndeavorOS is great, though I'd also suggest trying out nobara (or fedora if you're not gaming... or recording).

I'm really surprised that you managed to get VR working at all, didn't know that worked at all on linux.

[-] lckdscl@whiskers.bim.boats 4 points 1 year ago

I'm curious what you mean by "no animations while playing games"?

I like Wayland and use it on my laptop. But I also have Nvidia on my PC and while it's janky at places, I don't get all the problems you describe (at least on i3 for me)

I use multiple monitors with different refresh rates and don't really have any major issue. It syncs with the highest one. I indeed don't use a compositor because it's distracting and also turn off all the composition pipe line stuff. The result of turning off the latter is less latency and a teeny tiny bit of tearing in the lower 3rd when scrolling web pages but that's it.

Games can run utilize gsync when in-game vsync is enabled so long as you disable the second monitor with xrandr.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Archinstall is included on the Arch installation ISO. Which makes it a bit easier to get into Arch Linux.

[-] MOUCHE_A_MERDE@jlai.lu 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Arch, KDE, Wayland, pipewire... Not the most easy for a first jump but lot of goods choices 👍

[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I recently found an Android app on F-Droid called "Linux Command Library" and for the first time I'm not as intimidated to try Linux for my main driver/gaming rig. Previously, I had always fucked my installs up by facing an issue I wanted to fix, and using any info online to do so, even if I had no idea what the command was actually doing. Almost always I end up fucking everything up and needing to reinstall.

I've been saving posts and comments regarding Linux info for the last month on Lemmy and cannot wait to take the plunge and finally rid myself of Microsoft!

[-] icedterminal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Try using virtual machines. You can do this entirely free. Install then take a snapshot. You can learn about the OS in a safety net. If you fuck up too badly, roll back to the snapshot and try again.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sprite@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I recommend ZorinOS for new-new people.

I settled on EndeavourOS.

NixOS is tempting me, but ultimately I don't believe it would be an improvement for me rn. All I do is yay from time to time to update my system. It just works.

Honorary mentions to Fedora and OpenSUSE, which I used, but they demanded more input from me. On EndeavourOS everything just works, so I enjoy it the most.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shym3q@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

don't recommend manjaro. instead - vanilla arch or endeavour os

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Wait until you find out that your BIOS and Firmware are also proprietary! Gotta get rid of those, but Coreboot/Heads is a real rabbithole and needs lots of work to be usable.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

Gaming outside steam is fine too. Use Wine, Lutris, Proton

And Heroic Games Launcher.

[-] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

And Bottles

[-] MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

For gaming, I would add Heroic Games Launcher for Epic Games ang GoG titles. Otherwise a great summary. Welcome back to Linux! I made the switch a couple of years ago and have not had Windows installed on any of my computers since.

[-] Oikio@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

There are quite some comments and to clarify all misunderstanding regarding Arch vs something else or any other debates in this thread, I would like to add this comment.

I do not recommend Arch based distro over Debian based or anything else. Topic is about using Linux at its current state, I assume that most of distros will be more or less similar when it comes to statements of the post. In my case it was Archlinux distro, because I had prior experience and it's philosophy is appealing to me. Like rolling release, configure yourself, install only necessary for you things and etc.

I do not recommend to use Arch itself for a new user. I hope from the post it was clear, that new user should not care much about mentioned topics, like Pipewire vs Pulseaudio or Wayland VS X. One can use more high order distros or even different base, like Linux Mint. Which I also used long time ago and was quite happy about.

I do not say that KDE is better or worse than Gnome or whatever. For me it's just a preference, like possibility to have more control over UI and looks and to avoid some blockers, like DRM on Wayland. You can have them all on your machine, beauty of Linux.

And please do your own research on the topic and do take everything with grain of salt. There are a lots of great distros, desktop environments and other things. And there are tons of good and bad advices, navigating through which sometimes is not so easy.

And I would like to underline that there are not so many up to date objectivly better things when it comes to software, pick what you need and like.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
251 points (95.3% liked)

Linux

47504 readers
1353 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS