this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
967 points (96.7% liked)

internet funeral

6905 readers
2 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 80 points 1 year ago
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you say you'd pay for a search engine. Oof. Guys we used to just link useful things at the end of our blog posts and on our myspace pages. Then search engines came in and we didn't have to. Then they killed the SEO placement of blogs. Now you can't find anything useful unless you try their AI. The whole business model is convincing us we need them while they make the internet less efficient to scroll through.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... do you think MySpace came before search engines?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Replace Myspace with Geocities and it's broadly correct of my experience in 90s internet.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There were a ton of search engines in the 90s around the same time Geocities was released. AskJeeves was probably the most popular, but there was Altavista, Lycos, Dogpile, Yahoo... Shit, Google came out in 97, which was only a few years after Geocities.

[–] Senuf@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

When I had my Geocities website, I used Webcrawler as my preferred search engine. Cute spider and spiderweb iso/logo. Then came Altavista (altavista.digital.com, it was at first) and I switched. It brought more and better results. Somehow I never liked Lycos. And Yahoo, the first years, was a categorised catalogue/guide, kinda curated, and you had to submit a site to be considered to be added. You had to choose under which category (and subcategory, quite often) it should be listed. Also, at first, it wasn't Yahoo.com, it was buried in some .edu (or .ac, I don't quite recall) URL.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You just dated the hell out of yourself, but also showed how young you are at the same time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] joenforcer@midwest.social 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Google is not a search engine. It's an advertising service. Their whole business model revolves around a critical mass of eyeballs, which flock to free services. This will never happen for the average user.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
[–] MCk3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn’t their pricing per month not per query?

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$5 for 300 queries. $10 unlimited.

[–] lotophage@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They only changed that about a week ago, it used to be $10/1000 queries. Not that I'm complaining - I'm on that tier!

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah. i have seen I think in their FAQ that plan and confused me a bit. Moving from DDG to Kagi

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

The cheapest plan also has query limits.

[–] DrinkBoba@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is it outrageous to pay for a product? There are obvious reasons and benefits. Go use a free one then. No need to bash a good product because you don’t want it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kagi is like google was 10 years ago though, useable and useful, while Google has morphed an SEO trashcan. I wouldn't pay them any amount for current quality

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] camr_on@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Actual Internet funeral

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure you you understand how Google makes money...which would tell you why this would never happen.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I thought I understood how Twitter made money

[–] Tvkan@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Twitter didn't make money though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VinnieFarsheds@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I think you understood, but Elon didn't 🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 39Y523R@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'd pay for google if they didn't steal my data.

[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Bluff called

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stefenauris@pawb.social 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is literally how their search API works. Except the limit is more like 25 queries a day and the price would be closer to $40/mo for average user's usage.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Just to clarify. The API pricing is 100 requests per day for free and $5 for every 1000 requests over that. But, the API is limited to 10 items per request. Their own UI provides up to 100 results per page (the setting seems to be hidden now, but is still active for users who set it before), which would require multiple requests to match, plus an image and/or video carousels each of which require an additional query, opening images tab preloads 50 images just to fill the screen, which is 4 more requests minimum for any image search, and, given how clicking each image also loads a bunch of related images, the estimate of 4 requests per search is very conservative. I use search on average about 80 times a day, and, doing the math, it would cost me on average $33.48 per month to do my searches using their API instead of using the free and unlimited official UI. This is ridiculous. And then twitter and reddit did exactly the same thing, too.

[–] Tick_Dracy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What is that? Is that a meme or something?

Either way, the solution for that is here. If you’re one of the poor souls that still enjoy using the Google Search, you can use Startpage, I guess.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

DuckDuckGo is not really much better. And it uses Bing as a backend. Gone are the days of reliable search engines.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or DuckDuckGo, ecosia, bing, askjeeves, nexislexis, Qwant, altavista…

[–] beckerist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

altavista

wow, I had no idea it still existed! I don't think I've used it since it was altavista.digital.com

edit: it doesn't, it's just yahoo search now

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought the same about askjeeves, can’t believe it made it this long

[–] Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Damn! This talk of forgotten search engines made me realise that dogpile.com is still alive! I dimly recall using it before Google's rise to power.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SEND_NOODLES_PLS@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've recently started paying for unlimited searches over on Kagi, and I'm very happy with the results so far. I'd gladly pay if it meant less search cruft and higher result quality, but sadly Google's just been going downhill for quite a while now.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Its a big black box with an unquantifiable improvement in quality, and I have no particular inclination to sign of for yet another subscription service. Particularly when I already watch my existing services creep up in price year after year.

That's before I even get into shit like standard utilities. My electricity bill last month was $500, almost entirely based on the Texas AC bill. Bro, who has another $10/mo to spend on Newoogle when I'm maxed out just keeping the lights on?

[–] Misconduct@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Electric companies need to be taken to task it's getting stupid. Every year they whine about how the infrastructure can't handle our load and tell us to sweat it out during the hottest part of the day. Then, they raise the prices with the excuse of fixing it all and never do. It's fucking criminal

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Electric companies need to be taken to task it’s getting stupid.

They'll never be taken to task, because the profits they generate go back into the political system that made them into a cartel to begin with. And efforts to break up the cartel often result in an increased dedication to organizing and opposing anti-trust practices. Its a system that Nassim Taleb might describe as "anti-fragile".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Betch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Fucking do it, I dare you.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

bro did you make that meme?

[–] Yoru@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

wait, what? is Google actually a paid service now or is this a meme./?

[–] icedterminal@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is a meme. Google would kill their business model if they did this. Their whole model is to collect data from user searches and then make money off it.

[–] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure they get more money from people freely giving them data using a lot of their services (maps, search) than they'd get if they gatekept searching with a, subscription that people opted out of.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LaChaleurDeLaNuit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

it will be when it gets bought by Musk

[–] UnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›