this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023

49 points (100.0% liked)

News

23300 readers

3395 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

dezmd@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

3 tax prep firms shared 'extraordinarily sensitive' data about taxpayers with Meta, lawmakers say (www.kob.com)

submitted 1 year ago by zombuey@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] june@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Their report urges federal agencies to investigate and potentially go to court over the wealth of information that H&R Block, TaxAct and Tax Slayer shared with the social media giant.

For those that are just curious which companies are involved

That data came to Meta through its Pixel code, which the tax firms installed on their websites to gather information on how to improve their own marketing campaigns. In exchange, Meta was able to access the data to write targeted algorithms for its own users.

The program collected information on taxpayers’ filing status, income, refund amounts, names of dependents, approximate federal tax owed, which buttons were clicked on the tax preparers’ websites and the names of text entry forms that the taxpayer navigated, the report states.

Am I reading this correctly that this was malicious activity by Meta rather than the companies actively sharing data with Meta?

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Am I reading this correctly that this was malicious activity by Meta rather than the companies actively sharing data with Meta?

I'd think no because the companies had to explicitly install Meta's Pixel on their websites and specifically chose what data to send. Skimming, it sounds like Pixel is clearly documented as being to improve the accuracy of ads that Meta delivers.

So the companies knew exactly how this data was going to be used and still voluntarily sent it to Meta.

That said, Meta absolutely should have recognized that this data was too sensitive and banned the companies. Ok, let's be honest, they'd never do that on their own free will, since the data is obviously extremely valuable to them. More like there needs to be a law preventing Meta from using such data, because companies can't be trusted to do the right thing on their own.

[–] jyter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not Meta malicious activity this time, just the creepy tracking that happens on every website for marketing purposes. It’s the tax companies that specifically configured it to take in extra data - your tax data.

Pixel is used to track things like what page you came from, your IP, your facebook tracking cookies, what buttons you click on when, etc.. It’s creepy when you think about it, but fairly typical marketing tracking used by websites to try to optimize people actually buying things when they land on the website, or tracking what sites/ads people click on to get to the site and whether those referring sites generate sales.

However, pixel can be configured to also capture the data you fill out on a form displayed on a website and it appears these tax preparation companies did that. Someone at each of those companies had to configure each of the additional fields to capture in order to cause that data to be sent to Meta, and they should have known better.

load more comments