this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
176 points (99.4% liked)

News

23296 readers
3191 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The decision was “necessary to effectively manage risk exposure,” the company said.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

DeSantis, probably:

we should make it illegal for insurance companies to factor in rising sea levels to their actuarial tables

[–] paper_clip@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Fine, fine. You do that. We've upped the risk of kaiju attacked along the Florida coast. Water and wind kaiju, not the radioactive fire breathing ones."

"That makes no sense!"

"Neither does what you're proposing!"

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guess what, that would insurance companies only speed up heading out of that state.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DeSantis:

Insurance companies are trying to cancel Florida!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Now that would be a good thing!

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.one 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And in response, the state CFO is issuing twitter threats to the company, a tactic that has worked extremely well for Florida in recent history

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Chief Florida Officer? DeSantis can be Chief Florida Man or Florida-Man-in-Chief.

[–] skylestia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago

sell their houses to WHO ben? fucking AQUAMAN?!

[–] SkadusX@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

A spokesperson for Farmer’s said:

“You are fascists! Bum bum bum bum bum bum bum!”

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Well, I guess people who decided to buy property in high risk areas are going to need to face the music. But I am sure they will get a bail out like every companies do. God forbid anyone besides the poor face any consequences for their poor decisions.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not gonna root for an insurance company here, by God, but please get the hell out of Florida if you can.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I am reading it isn't like they are ghosting people. The insurance terms are not being renewed. If you paid for the next six months you still get those six months. Did anyone read something different?

[–] Senornomilkshake@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then what though.

Not condoning poor decisions like choosing to live in Florida but those people are going to be fucked when no insurance company will cover you for less than the cost of your mortgage.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know. Florida seems to have more land scam problems compared to other gulf states. Maybe address those.

[–] ProximaC@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

“We know a thing or two, because we've seen a thing or two.” and that's why we're getting the fuck out of Florida.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Oh boy, time for my insurance rates to double again!

Thanks DeSantis / GOP!

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Doing complex math to predict the future is how these companies make billions. The fact that they're Nope-ing out of Florida entirely should tell you something. If your plan was to move to Florida soon, maybe it's time to reconsider.

[–] flipthetube@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Didn’t they just do the same in California, along with State Farm and maybe others?

Thought I read something about it but didn’t get all the details.

[–] SplicedWren@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

They didn't leave California, no.

Article from today.

Limits on policies.

[–] Seraph@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

State Farm & Allstate due to wild fire risks.

[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Huh, it's almost like for-profit insurance companies shouldn't be a thing...

[–] neuropean@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On the other hand, maybe we should rebuilding in places with catastrophic disasters on an annual basis. How long should we keep doing the same thing expecting different results?

[–] rusticus1773@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

It’s hard to stomach bailing out people and parts of the country for events caused by a process they actively deny and lie about.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

From what I understand a large portion of the problem is rampant fraud in Florida. Florida accounts for 9% of the insurance claims nationally, but 79% of the insurance based lawsuits. Additionally 71% of the money spent for claims in Florida has gone to attorneys fees.

From what I understand, every time there is a storm contractors go around and tell people that their property (roof, deck, whatever) was damaged and they can get them a new one for free. The catch is that you have to sign over your power of attorney to file the claim. They do this whether your roof was actually damaged by the storm or not.

So the homeowner says yep, gets a new roof, and doesn't think anything more of it. The contractor sends in the claim and the insurance company responds saying you have to have an adjustor come out and evaluate the damages before doing the work if you want to file a claim. And it makes perfect sense, the insurance company has systems in place to protect against fraud, but the contractor ignores that and tries for it anyways. The contractors then respond by suing the insurance companies.

Because the contractor has gone around to several hundred houses he has a critical mass of cases that even if sole of them lose the settlements from those that succeed are enough to still make a profit.

https://www.iii.org/press-release/triple-i-extreme-fraud-and-litigation-causing-floridas-homeowners-insurance-markets-demise-062322

[–] paper_clip@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Florida actually has a state sponsored home owners insurance.

https://www.citizensfla.com/who-we-are

This was after private insurers started bailing out in the early 2000s when it became clear how ridiculously expensive it would be to provide hurricane insurance there.

[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm on Citizens. Every year I get a letter telling me they have the legal right to sell my policy if they find a comparable one in the private sector within 20% of what I'm paying. Every year they fail to find one. The best thing about Citizen's is that they can't leave the state.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago

They won't be in Florida soon.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Damn those LGBTQA+, CRT, public schools, libraries, and libruls.

Next hurricane season is also going to be a bailout season

\s

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

We don't cover natural events or anything that happens in the next 50+ years

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Awesome user name.

[–] oSillyScope@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Insurance, every kind, is the biggest scam since religion was invented. It should be a socialised utility paid for by the taxes already being sucked from our veins instead of funding endless wars all over the world.

[–] BlooregardQKazoo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

A counterargument is that people in places where we suffer few natural disasters shouldn't have to subsidize people that choose to live in places like Florida that suffer frequent disasters.

If the government becomes responsible for the bills to rebuild from disaster, then the government should have the ability to tell people they can't live somewhere that is going to flood every 10 years. And I imagine most people don't want that.

The free market solution to disincentivize people from living in places that increasingly suffer regular disasters is for it to become increasingly expensive to live there. Insurance prices skyrocketing accomplishes that, and if someone can't afford the insurance then they should cash out and move somewhere where they can afford to live.

But really, the problems in Florida are more about insurance fraud and a state government disinterested in doing anything about it. Maybe this will put pressure on the populace to forget culture wars and vote for people that will fix their problems. Ha!

[–] zombuey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I do understand your argument. This is a planned effort by insurers. They are all pulling out of these areas in protest in an attempt to persuade the government to increase the amount they pay to insurers to cover these areas. The government already subsidizes insurance sold in these areas and while it does come out of your taxes it does not impact your insurance costs regardless of what you might have been told.

SOURCE: This is second hand from a close friend who is an insurance executive at one of these firms. They are also doing this in California.

[–] MelonTheMan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's still feasible to tax risky areas more. If a property becomes uninsurable, great that property gets a big tax break and rebuilt every 10 years.

[–] Abstract8188@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

It's funny how fans of the free market assume that anyone can just pick up and leave, ignoring how godawful expensive that act is in itself. What about family and friend ties? Do you even realize how difficult it is to move across state lines? Your entire premise is so absolutely separated from reality.

load more comments
view more: next ›