this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1651 readers
26 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Dave@lemmy.nz
RaoulDuke@lemmy.nz
7
OCR and interest rate question (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IGuessThisIsMyName@lemmy.world to c/newzealand@lemmy.nz
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is probably a stupid question but... So I understand how the government uses the OCR to increase interest rates and drive inflation down by reducing the borrowing in an economy. What I've been thinking about recently though is could there be a mechanism whereby instead of the interest rate increase being solely at the cost of the borrower (rate increases > you pay more interest on the same total borrowing > total cost of borrowing over time increases) that some 'minimum principal' payment rate was increased instead.

So the idea being that if the OCR was 0.25 in 2020 and is 5.5 now, could that 5.25% increase (and thereby the decrease in overall borrowing) have been achieved through a minimum principal pay down rate instead. Borrowers are still paying more and therefore borrowing less, just that the banks and reserve bank don't have a greater take and new Zealanders end up with less total borrowing.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I guess you could fiddle with minimum equity rules - increase or decrease the proportion of the loan book that banks must have collateral to cover

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's stopping people taking on additional debt from other providers though?

[–] IGuessThisIsMyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They would still need to be able to service that debt though right? It's the same thing stopping people taking on additional debt ATM.

[–] w2qw@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Most people aren't using all their borrowing capacity. What stops those people taking on more debt is the unattractiveness of higher interest rates.

[–] BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

OCR isn't only to decrease the borrowing in the economy. It also reduces the money supply therefore propping up the currency.

[–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

That would be regulation of the banks. I believe the OCR is simply the interest rate that the banks can borrow money from the reserve bank. The banks can lend out money at whatever rate they want, it's just market forces that keep their rate at around the OCR.

In the current system of free market capitalism the banks have to be free to leech as much profit as possible from the people, no equitable regulation allowed.

[–] felixfurtak@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like the idea where you have a compulsory Kiwisaver-type scheme which earners have to contribute to. So when you want to reduce spending in the economy, you simply increase the rate that earners have to put into the scheme.

People have less money in their pocket to spend, thereby reducing demand in the economy in a deflationary way.

But importantly, they get to keep the money that is invested, but access to it just gets deferred until they retire.