Ok right, so they'll use this as fuel for us to exit the EU court of human rights. Joy 😔
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
42 points (95.7% liked)
United Kingdom
4089 readers
123 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah but lets face it They will use anything. Unfortunately to many (mainly right wing) brits want the UK to dump all international cooperation.
Cant really fault the young people for feeling the current govs are screwing them over long term. Maybe if more in the UK were able to sue past generations leaders. They may care.
Above said. Exxon are the corp who needs the most legal action. They literally funded and ran the science that discovered the first evidence of global warning. Then as management changed. Funded the largest fight to discredit it over decades. These guys are/were international criminals in my mind.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A key plank of the UK government’s defence against the biggest climate legal action in the world next week has fallen away as a result of the U-turn by the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, on green policies.
They will argue in the grand chamber of the Strasbourg court that the nations’ policies to tackle global heating are inadequate and in breach of their human rights obligations.
Lawyers representing the six young people taking the legal action are to present evidence that the current policies of the 32 countries mean the world is on track to reach 3C of global heating within their lifetimes and argue that the governments’ failure to act quickly enough to reduce emissions breaches the human rights of their clients.
But the retreat this week on several key policies designed to ensure the UK meets its future carbon budgets and its legal obligation to reach net zero by 2050 has brought the government into direct collision with the committee.
Aged from 11 to 24, the six Portuguese claimants say they were driven to act by their experiences in the wildfires that ripped through the Leiria region in 2017, killing 66 people and destroying about 20,000 hectares (50,000 acres) of forest.
Crowdfunded by people around the world who have donated more than £100,000, they are seeking a binding ruling from the judges to force the countries to rapidly escalate their emissions reductions in what would be a historic milestone in climate litigation.
The original article contains 756 words, the summary contains 244 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!