this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
208 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22110 readers
245 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] literallyacat@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Give the poor nothing and we will have nothing left to lose. eyes guillotine hungrily

[–] Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Literally everyone in this comment section is missing “regardless of the individual eligibility of each student”. Everyone is getting hysterical over something that isn’t even in the cards. This isn't about not feeding the poor. This is about not giving the free food you should be giving the poor to people who simply don't need it.

Of course a lot of kids rely on free school lunches and they aren’t trying to take that away. They’re trying to restrict free lunches to kids with parents who are actually incapable of feeding them. If parents can afford food for their kids, feed your fucking kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nzodd@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Attention conservatives: you can't ~~marry~~ legally rape children or force them into child labor if you already starved them to death first.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Always think about the children, except when it's something that directly impacts the lives of children.

[–] lyam23@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

It's really quite shocking how the GOP agenda can be predicted by asking yourself, "What's the worst thing someone would in a given situation?". What's even more shocking is that they have engineered the political framework to disproportionately grant them enough power to sometimes pass these regressive policies. But for most of America, sigh, just another Thursday...

[–] levochemist@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

How is this a thing that people rally for? Like WTF

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

what they fail to understand is that for poorer communities, kids rely on these lunches for meals when their families can't afford to buy food

[–] bdiddy@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

"those deadbeat parents should've got an abortion if they can't feed their kid" --republicans probably

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SnowboardBum@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Very on brand for them. Especially after they denied free school lunch in North Dakota and turned around a week or so later and raised their daily meal allowance.

[–] derived_allegory@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

How dare you suggest that children and our future are more important than old millionaire boomer trolls, that uses every fiber of their being to screw everyone over so that they can have enjoy free vacations from their CEO friends?

[–] negativenull@negativenull.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What happened to states rights? Wasn't that the rationale of getting rid of RoweVWade? Oh yeah, that was another lie. Of course it was.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›