this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
208 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22103 readers
208 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] evan_unit_one@beehaw.org 35 points 2 years ago

Beyond disgusting. Keep the kids hungry so they can't learn while sitting in their underfunded classrooms. Uneducated masses ripe for the conservative picking. Can't see through their lies if you've never been taught how to think. I hate it here...

[–] Plume@beehaw.org 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tearing down women's rights. Ruining queer people's life, especially trans people. Making sure children can't eat for free. Wow. Quite the priorities over at the Republican party.

I'm not American, I've just been looking from afar for a long time now. But from everything I'm seeing... it feels like they're going to be in for quite the rude awakening in 2024.

[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

Unless you're Russian, you probably aren't familiar with living in the kind of media environment we have which can cause these clearly absurd ideas to seem normal for people to have. This lunacy is within our overton window. Centrists think it's about half right. Liberals think it's wrong but more or less fair to hold these views. A younger and further left contingent which has almost no representation in the government (because we put elecrions upnfor sale in 2010 with Citizens United) but is growing is the only group who finds this kind of thing completely unacceptable.

[–] Myaa@beehaw.org 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You know, I try to keep an open mind and try to understand how the other side could come to the conclusions they do, but sometimes they really make it difficult. I genuinely don't get how this could be construed as anything other than malicious. What's the benefit in this? How is this "thinking of the children?" How did a political party come to represent views that are so aggressively anti-humanity? It's such a bizarre platform to attach yourself to so proudly and openly.

[–] doublejay3000@feddit.uk 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

imagine being in the strategy meeting with your team, when they suggest a play based on suspending withdrawing food from child would go well with your voters.

imagine agreeing to go with it. getting a speech written about it and one day standing at the lectern to say in front of crowd of assembled people "it is not our responsiblity to feed children". and then pausing for applause and going home and telling your spouse, "today went great".

in this supply chain of inhumanity, there were so many opportunities for the heart to say "yo...something is off here.....cant quite put my finger on it.......but it doesnt seem.....right ?."

to sail through all those checkpoints of human decency, and go through with it, is nothing less than psychopathy.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago

The horrifying thing is that there are people out there who will consider it the right thing to do.

[–] UnhealthyPersona@beehaw.org 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's crazy to me is it seems like they just want children to suffer. They want to force women to give birth, but then don't give a shit about what happens to the children after. On top of that, it's like they are trying to make them suffer even more for their parents being unable to provide.

I could somewhat get attacking programs for adults. Still disagree, but I guess it's the "they should be able to provide for themselves" mentality. But then doing this for children when they are literally unable to provide for themselves or have any responsibility for being hungry. Yes, let's make the helpless children suffer.

Disgusting times we live in.

[–] KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They want to force children into the labor pool. Can't afford to eat? Get a job Timmy! Oh and by the way if you don't pay your school lunch debt, we're calling CPS and taking you away from your parents. So get to work!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What. The. Fuck. Is wrong. With. These people?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnderlyingLogic@beehaw.org 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

It's just cruel. A disgusting, cruel mindset from those who genuinely just want to hurt others.

Anyone supporting this lacks the most basic of morals. There is no excuse for this.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 21 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Why….. I grew up on free and reduced lunches. The return on investment here is immense.

[–] deedasmi@lemmy.timdn.com 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I make six figures working at the highest levels of my career in support of government agencies. I used free/reduced lunches my entire schooling. It’s super ridiculous

[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Same, my property tax for this month alone will have more than paid for my entire schooling career of subsidized food.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ozoned@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

Obviously being nice to 1 person just leads to communism! I'll bet you now believe that people should have access to food, clean water, clean air, health care, and shelter as well? DON'T YOU!?

I do as well. :-)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bear_delune@beehaw.org 21 points 2 years ago

The whole point in these kind of moves is to cause congestion and exhaustion in political movement.

It’s a struggle to campaign for actual improvements when we’re all stuck fighting garbage like this all the time.

It’s deliberate obstruction and a standard GOP play

[–] Gollan@beehaw.org 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Given that the Republicans are nominally a Christian party, has no one in the party had a look at what Jesus taught about feeding the hungry? It is pretty clear, and it is NOT this.

[–] OfficialThunderbolt@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] azertyfun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

The children yearn for the mines, for only the mines make them worthy of a hearty meal.

Also thank you for addressing the "but the bible is progressive akshully" bullshit. No it's not. Never has been. The new testament is less backwards, but to dismiss the old testament entirely is hypocritical and maybe even heretical. The bible is problematic if you look at it objectively, as is any form of moral prescriptivism from millennia ago.

[–] Gork@beehaw.org 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

How did this get normalized? Why is this even something that is even considered debatable? As a society, feeding our children should be the first priority.

I'm flubbered.

[–] ghostalmedia@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Echo chambers that reinforce the lie that democrats want to take your money to pay for irresponsible people’s children.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe they are irresponsible, but that's not their kids fault. Feeding kids regardless of who their parents are, is a basic morality thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArcticCircleSystem@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why do they want the children to suffer for it though??? ~Cherri

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] matzah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Really putting evil front and center this time, huh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just evil… no nuance needed.

[–] alottachairs@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

Yes. it just breaks my heart that people seem to have a goal to make the lives of the vulnerable as hard as possible.

[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago

I’m reluctant to use the word “evil”, but I can’t think of another word that accurately describes their goals and behavior. They simply hate anyone who isn’t just like them. Different race? SUFFER AND DIE. Different economic bracket? SUFFER AND DIE. Different beliefs on sexuality? SUFFER AND DIE.

They think that others are a threat to the “moral fabric” of America, but they themselves are a threat to the mere existence of millions of Americans.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago

They're not even bothering to lie any more, and yet everyone still votes for them.

You know that scene in Final Fantasy 8 where Edea announces her evil plan to a huge crowd and calls them morons and they all clap and cheer? This is like that.

[–] Mister_Haste@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I imagine they twirled their mustaches and maniacally laughed while announcing this. How much more cartoonishly villainous can they get?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 15 points 2 years ago

"There is no such thing as a free lunch", they said :(

To pull more of the article into the comment section:

The Republican Study Committee (of which some three-quarters of House Republicans are members) on Wednesday released its desired 2024 budget, in which the party boldly declares its priority to eliminate the Community Eligibility Provision, or CEP, from the School Lunch Program. Why? Because “CEP allows certain schools to provide free school lunches regardless of the individual eligibility of each student.”

Of note is that the CEP is not even something every school participates in; it is a meal service program reserved for qualifying schools and districts in low-income areas. The program enables schools that predominantly serve children from low-income backgrounds to offer all students free breakfast and lunch, instead of means-testing them and having to manage collecting applications on an individual basis. As with many universal-oriented programs, it is more practically efficient and, as a bonus, lifts all boats. This is what Republicans are looking to eliminate.

It’s the kind of provision that many would want every school to participate in. Why not guarantee all our children are well fed as they learn and think about our world and their place in it, after all?

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pro-life, pro-child, pro-family values 👍🤗💖💯

[–] theDuesentrieb@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

thinner kids are harder targets /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Whar@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago

What a weird priority to have.

[–] fritobugger@vlemmy.net 15 points 2 years ago

Just normal GOP evil.

[–] MaxPower@feddit.de 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"I love the poorly educated"

They sure do. Dumb people vote for dumb candidates.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why aren't they self aware enough to realize they sound like cartoon villains?

[–] sirvesa@beehaw.org 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

They are appealing to their voters who want them to "hurt the right people"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] awwsom@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and this is developed nation XD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SmugBedBug@lemmy.iswhereits.at 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's like they say, universal free school meals leads to a lazy population and communism.

Jokes aside, I really don't understand their fear of anything that resembles socialized programs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theDuesentrieb@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

Can somebody please think off the children!!

Oh wait..

[–] albert180@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago

Republicans ensuring the US will continue wandering the path to a 3rd world country.

[–] pocahontas@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that's a weird priority to have... even weirder to be so proud to announce it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zelsabriel@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But I thought they were so worried about the children... /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (34 children)

The fact that its been so normalized to be this openly shitty and callous toward frigging children... i dont even know how to react to this any more.

Im not saying its hopeless, but I feel like a lot of people on the "lets not let children go hungry" side of the fence are almost left speechless by these idiots. But i feel like thats almost part of their strategy - stunning the opposition. There has to be a better response.

What's the best way to respond to this kind of brazen cruelty? (Besides voting and campaigning for candidates who arent sociopathic).

[–] polygon@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Listen, this is hard thing for me to type but I think is relevant to the Republican mindset. Hundreds of children are being murdered in their classrooms. Literal murder. Of children. This is not enough to sway Republicans on gun control. If actual murder of 6 year olds doesn't have any effect on them, surely 6 year olds being hungry is not even going to make them blink. This is the reality with these people. They simply do not care about you, or your children, and everything they do is governed only by money and power.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›