this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
94 points (99.0% liked)

Opensource

1742 readers
150 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly the automatic songpicker does not work for my usecase.
The only thing I have seen work correctly without dumping me into a non-music video after 3 steps are mixes, which this app does not appear to use.
So it's still revanced for me.

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Everything else about it is great. It seems a lot more reliable and light weight compared to yt, and the easy way to make videos offline-available is nice too.
If I could just add my dedicated mix-algorithm-gaming account and use that to get access to mixes (which google locked behind a login requirement some years ago) this would be perfect.

[–] Linearity@infosec.pub 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Music streaming isn’t a software thing, it’s a service. Who provides the service that this client uses?

[–] Arthur@literature.cafe 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] lzccr@programming.dev 1 points 16 hours ago

All this software provides is eliminate tracking in the client side unless it uses stuff like invidious or piped

Essentially, this is a wrapper around YouTube. So like newpipe, but with a music focus and I imagine a metadata library like musicbrainz.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

This is exactly what I wanted. Thank you for posting it!

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh, is this a fork of innertune?

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 3 points 1 day ago

No, doesn't seem so.