this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
11 points (76.2% liked)

World News

32669 readers
463 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gil2455526@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 10 hours ago

Now watch the majority of the news outlets who published the sabotage accusation not mention this at all.

[–] modulus@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago

First it was NS2, now the cables. I wonder if they'll admit the claims of Russian EM weapons--so-called Havana syndrome--are likewise groundless.

[–] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee -3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Just like many Russian accidents, those undersea cables just fell out of windows.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago
[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Wonder why Bezos' media channel, aligned with Trump, aligned with etc. is the only source on this..

Meanwhile the investigators in question deny this because of course they deny and we can't trust those either.

Lol the article even has community notes

The comments overwhelmingly express skepticism about the conclusion that undersea cable damage was caused by maritime accidents rather than Russian sabotage. Many commenters argue that it is implausible for ships to accidentally drag anchors for long distances without noticing, suggesting intentional actions instead. There is a strong sentiment that the article's headline misrepresents the content, with accusations of spreading misinformation and downplaying potential Russian involvement.