this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
427 points (99.5% liked)

Uplifting News

11823 readers
452 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

damn how will the isps afford the maintenance costs of digging up a cable once every 100 years

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago

Around my part of the woods I can either pay 50€ for Gigabit over coaxial cable or 35€ for 16 MBit DSL. Less than 2% of the speed for 70% of the price.. wtf?

I wish they would offer a basic, affordable option for singles or people who don't need a high bandwidth connection. Charging over 30€ foe it seems excessive.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Low-income plans

Love to means-test fucking everything. You can't just have $15/mo internet. You have to plead poverty for fear of middle class or (god forbid) rich people getting a basic utility at a sensible price.

Nevermind how means testing inevitably creates these legal hurdles for administrators to leap over. The act of means testing is inevitably what businesses target in an effort to avoid compliance. "Oh! It's too hard to tell who qualifies! Undo burden! Undo burden!" It wouldn't be a burden if the ISP was limited to a universal flat rate. It wouldn't be a burden if municipalities owned and operated their own independent flat-rate internet service as a public utility.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The blue states always have the cool stuff!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 22 hours ago

Just a coincidence, I'm sure.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And red states are welfare states with crabs in a bucket mentality

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"We can't afford rent, bread and Internet, what happened, fuck socialism I guess???"

  • standard American who voted for the billionaire party
[–] don@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

“Oh, yeah? Well at least we passed laws requiring us to identity ourselves if we wanna use porn, lol! You can keep your cheap broadband internet! Ha!” — Red States

[–] Cliff@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Why would you need broadband internet if it isn't for porn in the first place?

[–] Jaeger86@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wish I hadn't built my life in the red hellhole

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Sunk cost fallacy... It might be worth moving in the long run. It's far from perfect, but I know that the difference between living in a solid blue state, vs a purple state, is huge. I can't even imagine coming from a deep red state. Shit would be like entering the Promised Land.

Which is sad, because blue states have their fair share of issues.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

What about me? When I was born Ohio is what we'd now call blue. I say it that way because when I was born, states didn't have colors. In fact in 1980 when reagan won, the map he won was blue. Today that wouldn't make sense, so you get my point.

By the time I was a teenager Ohio had become a swing state.

And now it's red.

Where the fuck is my blue ohio I was brought up in???

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I used to live in Alberta and I’m still reeling from that.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bret Hart still running around up there complaing about goldberg?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 22 hours ago
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Something something freedom something? *

* Offer not valid in all 50 states, void where prohibited

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 27 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The funniest (or saddest?) part of all this is that $15 is considered "low". It's still pretty high for something so vital (and tbf I'd much rather see a requirement for like 5-10 Mbps at $5 or so; you don't need much bandwidth for meaningful, very useful service).

[–] pcr3@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

It's crazy how many people equate Mbps latency. Broadband companies spread this lie that faster is better.

You can game lag free and have VoIP calls with zero interruption on 5Mbps.

Only thing more Mbps helps with is downloading larger files faster.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Still remember playing WoW on under 5Mbps, updating was painful but otherwise playing was fine

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Also helps with streaming and many, many other services

Having said that, though, yeah... 99% of the population doesn't need more than 10Mbit / person

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You can game lag free and have VoIP calls with zero interruption on 5Mbps.

Yeah on like... 2-4 devices total lol.

What if I want to play MariokartDS online with 8 of my friends on the same connection?

My WEP router advertises 11 Mbps WiFi, I want to use the whole thing.

^/s

[–] pcr3@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I see the /s , but I remember hosting 16 people lobbies with 5 Mbps. Its not about bandwidth, but more throughput. Yes, some overhead will cause bandwidth issues, but most of it is THROUGHPUT (ping/ latency).

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

True, I remember doom running practically smooth on IPX and IPv4.

I guess it could also depend on the game implementation. Sandbox games end up using a little bit more sending shared world data, but even then as long as you're not loading a million objects at once, you'll probably be fine.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I understand the argument but there is far less issues and costs associated with fibre connections which are virtually limitless in terms of speed - theoretical limits apply butbwe are still seeing new equipment at either ends that allow for multiple tbps speeds.

Lol Internet Essentials is $10 for 50Mbps (if you qualify, that is)

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Making the connection slower doesn’t magically make it cheaper.

[–] nnullzz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I not disagreeing but $15 would still put it at one of the cheapest if not the cheapest vital service. I’m not sure you could get any other utility for much lower than that.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

1 Mbit/s should be free.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I wish California would implement this law as well.