this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
237 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

32712 readers
686 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

If you are worried about privacy, you shouldn't use Google anyway. I write this from a deoogled android custom rom

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What's scary is all of the ways they can track you even without your browser actively cooperating. For example, they can create an HTML5 canvas, render a bunch of shapes, and then probe individual pixels to get a read on your graphics card and drivers. The EFF has a very educational test you can subject your browser to in order to see how easy it is to fingerprint it based on these kinds of things.

[–] Tiger_Man_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

This test just keeps refreshing infinitely

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kind of surprised to see that Brave does much better in this test than Firefox with extensions (on Android)

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Oh God, wait for the downvotes....

Seriously, this is the reason I started using Brave.

[–] colgate_treedom@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 days ago

privacy-enhancing technologies

Ahh yes, of course!

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I don’t use google stuff rn so…

Not even Google maps since I had an ad placed in my route so it clicked the ad while I was selecting which route to take. Bu bye

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Use Organic Maps

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Me neither, but I guess the tracking will also take place when you just browse the internet and visit websites, that have Google Ad Tracking technologies implemented (which could be the majority of websites). Tracking and Ad-Blockers like uBlock might help a bit, though.

The specifics are complex—these are the algorithms that ingest all the data signals you give off when browsing the internet on any device, some based on who you are—device, IP and credential identifiers, but also the sites you visit and apps you use as a map to be followed and analyzed.

[–] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've been using Noscript on firefox for a while. It basically blocks any JavaScript (and other stuff) unless you specifically allow it. It's not something that I would recommend for a casual user, because it breaks lots of sites. By using it, I've discovered how much nonessential stuff is jammed into your browser. Most of it is analytics and tracking. One home improvement store has over 25 scripts when less than a quarter are needed for a functioning site.

Some of the biggest offenders: offenders:

  • home improvement stores
  • car dealerships
  • some big box retailers

Also, a shoutout to decentraleyes, a plugin to use local copies of JavaScript code so that it's not downloaded (and reported back to) Google.

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Same here. I was a uMatrix user for a long time and I was astonished sometimes how bloated some sites were with scripts and tracking domains. Nowadays I mostly use Edge on my work machine which is somehow ad-free but all sites work.

Firefox with uBlock / uMatrix needed often too much fine tuning to make sites work properly.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah. I know Ublock Origin can do this content blocking as well, but NoScript is just more convenient for me.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I thought they were already doing this... what's new now?

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Someone needs to answer this

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn‘t know, but could be it says something about that in the attached hyperlink.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 15 points 3 days ago

I ain't clicking Forbes slop lol

Nice try tjo

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

What are realistic ways to protect ourselves?

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Use browsers like Cromite, Iridium, Waterfox, Betterfox, Firedragon, Tor, Vanadium. Disabke fingerprinting in hidden settings or in about:config. Don't install too much extensions, if you can, none. That can be used to fingerprint you. If you don't have the need, disable javascript and webassembly. Change your useragent to something very common

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 69 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Use alternative browsers (Safari, Firefox) and alternative platforms (iOS, GrapheneOS).

[–] hollerpixie@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

I've had some internal struggles on this. Have used graphene for a long time and the last phone completely avoided using any G products (not even sandboxed) but still worry about the hardware, especially with the new AI chips. Can't imagine that the ability to fingerprint using their hardware isn't available.

So I vacillate between Fairphone/PinePhone with Linux or just anonymity through the masses with iOS. It sucks, the whole turn. Either get a fully functional smartphone and pick your poison or use a limited or dumb phone but know your smart TV/car/computer/etc will still be there for vulnerability.

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apple tracks their users even more

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Where are you seeing that?

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Do you think it can track me in duckduckgo on android?

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

No, if you have a degoogled android custom rom

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (12 children)

If it is the Android that comes with the phone, it comes with Google Play and Google Services libraries installed. It is tracking you already. If you use Duckduckgo at least they will not know what you search for (and you will get better search than AI-ridden Google search..).

If you want an Android that doesn't track you all the time, listens to you and those around you, etc etc, you need to use a vanilla android like https://lineageos.org/ as it comes, and not install the Google Services packages. This means that you may not be able to use some bank apps or popular apps such as Uber, etc that heavily depend on Google Services. Some chat apps may also have a delay in receiving messages.

Yes it sucks. It's doable though. Welcome to the future. If we do nothing it will get even worse.

Edit: some governments are pushing for apps to not depend on Google propietary libraries. For example in the EU transit apps (city, trains ticket planners etc) are being migrated away from using Google Maps and into OpenStreetmaps, and those apps run nicely with a vanilla LineageOS. We need to keep this momentum.

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Any degoogled AOSP rom will do fine. I use InfinityX (made by a well-known indian rom developer, Tejas Singh)

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 6 points 4 days ago

Presumably combined with Tor or a VPN or multiple ISPs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not sure there is. Dimensionality of the trackble elements is very high. All of them have to either be the same or fuzzed across large groups of users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yoshisaur@lemm.ee 16 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I'm on grapheneOS using Ironfox (fork of Mull because it's been killed off), I should be safe, right?

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

That's great

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 41 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No. They are fingerprinting you when you use Google services, including Google ads on other sites.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They killed off Mull? Bummer.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago (7 children)

The whole DivestOS project was ended, together with its apps :(

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I strongly recommended installing EFF's Privacy Badger on your and your relatives browsers.

This stops many trackers, and causes less side effects and less breakages than most filters (unlock et all).

[–] RiQuY@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you have uBlock Origin then Privacy Badger is redundant. Also, more extensions = easier fingerprinting.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Privacy Badger focus on blocking trackers. uBlock origin blocks all kind of things Ads,Trackers,etc and so it have a higher risk of breaking sites.

Yes, they're mostly redundant. Happy uBlock Origin users should probably keep using just uBlock. People who don't use uBlock to avoid breaking websites, or just want to block trackers, should use Privacy Badger.

[–] rickywithanm@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Another option if you wish to protect your whole network is to set up something like pi-hole or AdGuard. I recently set up pi-hole on our network. I’m shocked by the amount of blocked traffic coming from phones and windows machines. Don’t even get me started on the traffic from our smart tv.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

basically they hijack dns resolution to return does not exist errors when requests are sent to the tracking systems. highly effective, but also many sites are negatively impacted by them because no one codes for failure in the web industry.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

how do they know where the tracking systems are?

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

there are well known distribution lists that people add servers to that these things periodically fetch and use to perform the blocking.

load more comments
view more: next ›