this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
95 points (97.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44184 readers
2111 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Feel really guilty, my one family member gave me this. I don't use much google stuff anymore and I really dislike the company as it gets more intrusive. Is there anything I can do with this thing besides give it away? Nothing is worse than getting a gift that you can't use.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago

Give it (or sell it) to a person with disabilities. I have a disorder where my joints dislocate constantly, and if it wasn't for my service dog, I would be screwed. The ability of these things to call 911 or other family members is awesome and can be life saving. I've even read about a woman who collapsed down the stairs and turned music up to wake up their partner. Gotta do what you've gotta do.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 138 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just sell it online and be honest when asked. Gifting culture is too guilt based, just do the sensible thing and plow through that ridiculous social barrier like a bulldozer.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah. I already informed them I don't feel comfortable with it in the house. But I'm also the type to use TOR on all my devices. So I don't know how paranoid that came off as.

I think I am going to try to trace down where they got it from. I'm thinking Walmart so, they may take it without a receipt I hope.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Best to sell it. Since you use Tor you’re probably already on a watchlist

[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve heard this a lot - is it just a common joke in privacy circles, or is anyone using Tor/Tails actually likely to be on a list?

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I don’t really know what I’m talking about tbh, but my understanding is the more unique you make yourself, the easier you are to identify. For example, as soon as you use an ad blocker, your browser fingerprint becomes more unique because your average person doesn’t use an ad blocker. Even fewer people use Tor. So if someone knows you are using Tor, then they know you are 1 of maybe 100,000 people instead of millions (idk if those numbers are accurate, but you get the point).

That being said, Tor does do a pretty good job of making you blend into all the other Tor users.

But what I was talking about initially was mostly your ISP identifying your Tor traffic. So you use a VPN, but again you are now more unique than someone not using a VPN, even if your traffic is more encrypted.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The Snowden leaks revealed that simply subscribing to Linux Journal was enough to put you in a list for enhanced monitoring.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] necrobius@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Didn't you know? Only criminals use Tor! \s

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I just prefer it to not get pre-aggrigated results.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The thing with gifts is to thank them for their intent, even if you tell them why you're not going to keep the item.

If you don't succeed in returning it, you might also consider giving it to someone with a movement disability, for whom the assistance might outweigh the privacy issue.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

They are fantastic for the disabled. Everyone I know whonis disabled has the Amazon ones for some reason.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There is a stereo microphone and a camera in that thing. What good would Tor do in that case? That data would still make its way to google, unless you can root the whole thing and put a custom OS on it.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not running TOR on the nest. That would be dumb. I'm mentioning this is coming from a whole other end of technology. I like privacy. Google is not very private.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

oh ok i thought you were considering tunneling that things traffic through tor somehow

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 2 points 21 hours ago

No, because the data would still need to find a way to google services

[–] bradboimler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They have microphones. They don't have cameras.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Oh i thought it did the motion recognition with a camera, but it actually uses a type of radar.

https://support.google.com/googlenest/answer/10388741?hl=en

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks like it's technically possible to replace the OS, if you wanted to explore that option https://fredericb.info/2022/06/breaking-secure-boot-on-google-nest-hub-2nd-gen-to-run-ubuntu.html

[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 4 points 21 hours ago

It might* be worth trying this and installing home assistant.

*I say might because I just got some IoT stuff on sale and installed home assistant before realising there's nothing useful in home automation except zoned heating. Fun to play with though, I guess.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google owns Nest. Personally, I don’t use Google products due to their incredibly invasive ToS.

https://tosdr.org/en/service/217

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 22 hours ago

That’s what OP already said in the text of their question.

[–] parpol@programming.dev 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just return it. I'm sure they'll understand. And it's the thought that matters.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 day ago

Do they live with you? If not, I guess just sell it.

If yes, you're probably as screwed as me.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

We keep ours on a window sill behind a curtain. We have to yell at it 3 times to make it work, but it's still better than looking under the couch for the tv remote.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't have a TV. That's why the nest thing is so odd. It does seem like it would bw fun to tinker around with.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

It's handy - turn on/off lights, adjust thermostat, set reminders (like to remember cat medicine) or cooking timers. We had the Google one but switched to the Alexa one So i could 'drop in' on my mom and set it to call me if she said HELP.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Tell it to shut the fuck up (it works, that's why my grandfather likes it)

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk what input the device has but you may block it via your router and use it as a speaker

[–] Roopappy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't even trust that. Google devices hard-code DNS and IPs and... I have no evidence or knowledge of it, but I assume that they have some Sidewalk-like ability to communicate directly to other Google devices to get outside the network you want them to be on.