this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
110 points (98.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9896 readers
327 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It’s that stupid AI pricing needs to be more regulated.

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 14 hours ago

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

How long before Americans start calling it "crowd sourced housing"? #grindset

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 37 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

"Anyone who has ever struggled with poverty knows how extremely expensive it is to be poor; and if one is a member of a captive population, economically speaking, one's feet have simply been placed on the treadmill forever." - James Baldwin

"The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet." - Terry Prachett

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boots_theory

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 19 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

While the above is absolutely true, the rich are rich because of generational wealth. And if you go back far enough, that generational wealth is based on exploitation, environmental abuse, genocide, all the hits.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Pratchett mentions generational wealth as well, noting the attics full of furniture and sturdy tweeds which could be handed down, and the estate itself, which could not only house innumerable family members and friends and their servants, but also provided income from rents and food from the gardens, fields, and animal pens. It's just more spread about, whereas the Boots Theory of Poverty is a complete thought.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's about the lock in of poverty. It's not meant to be taken literally. It's about the increased costs levied on the poor that make it impossible to get out once you are in.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 14 hours ago

The other side of that coin is that the poor have to buy from the rich, and the rich have bigger profit margins when selling cheaper items to the poor. This is exploitation of a captive market.

[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 14 hours ago

Usually, it's not even going back at all. The generational wealth kids I grew up around still had their parents stealing their workers' wages and engaging in fucked up business practices.

It might not be exterminating a native population kind of thing, but there's that whole thing about the banality of evil and generally accepted insanity, so I still think it counts.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is horrifying. We're watching the American people get squeezed out of their homes into fucking motels after doing everything they could to stay afloat. This is awful.

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And then the government spends more tax payer money on housing them in motels than it would cost to house them properly, because those funds are only available for emergencies.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

But at least we can rest easy knowing profit was extorted to the Mac along the way to create a market humanity doesn't need.