22
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LlamaSutra@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's lousy being blocked by an entire section of the site and now labelled a bigot because some trolls made their accounts on the same instance as me.

[-] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed, it sucks. But their admins are talking to our admins, and so far ours seem like they have their heads screwed on pretty well, so I'm sure it'll only be for a short time.

Oust the shitheads, promote the stand-up sh.it.heads, I say.

[-] LlamaSutra@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

To be honest I had no idea that people from this instance were doing it until one troll post bragging about getting us banned from Beehaw and explained how he did it, along with a comic book supervillian diatribe about how the Fediverse isn't safe and long live Reddit.

[-] aport@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

The internet was a mistake

[-] qprimed@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

such users will eventually be relegated to their own little isolated fediverse.

[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

How though? The fediverse is... Federated. They can hop from server to server and be annoying to their heart's content and everyone on every federated server will get exposed to it. That and the traditional tools of the trade whereby if your account ever gets banned, you just make a new one.

[-] g8phcon2@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

and its certainly part of the reason gab.com decided to deactivate federation from their implementation of mastodon.

[-] g8phcon2@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

yeah, but they all want to be together. For other examples look at shitposter.club noagendasocial.com etc.

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

just a heads up, in the past beehaw has accused other instances of brigadding, and being bigots over disagreements that had nothing to do with the such (I know that becuase that was story 3 and 4 respectivly) there is a decent chance that they have done the blocking over a difrent reason (like to exert a level of control) and then back justified. I will be really honest, do not take the beehaw admins word at face value for anything

[-] g8phcon2@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, the url literally contains shit.

[-] chickenwing@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

If we can't say naughty words on lemmy I'll have to find something else. Can't there be a website with a middle ground between 4th reich HQ and baby preschool?

[-] ActionScripter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Can’t there be a website with a middle ground between 4th reich HQ and baby preschool?

Sometimes it feels like the internet is in an unstable equilibrium. A space starts off as a blank slate, not pulled in any particular direction. Then as soon as it gets a critical mass of either miserable jerks or stuck-up prudes, it spirals in that direction until it's inhospitable to the average person.

[-] gawdahm@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

The hell, lol… do you have a link to that post?

[-] racer983@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I saw the same post the comment above is referring to and their description is accurate. And I also saw the offending post they put on beehaw. Some low effort troll homophobic thing. Their posts on both beehaw and sh.itjust.works were both quickly down voted and removed I think, because I couldn't find either again shortly after I first saw it.

[-] gawdahm@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Damn... Yeah, to be honest, it makes me understand things from beehaw's perspective quite a bit, then.

[-] zalack@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I'm sure it doesn't feel great, but I didn't get the sense that they were trying to personally attack everyone on the relevant servers, but more of a "we're only four people, did not expect our instance to become a "default" community, and are completely underwater from a moderation perspective. We need to pull a rip cord to get this under control"

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wait did sh.itjust.works do anything? I thought the story was that beehaw.org cut them and lemmy.world off, but only for people browsing on beehaw.

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

No Beehaw did not like how Sh.itjust.works and lemmy.world are run, did a complant session about how their mod tools are not talored to give them an excise of power on users not based in their instance, and then cut them off saying "they are willing to negotiate reopening." Personaly I see this like union bargoning, we are stronger all sticking together and not bending to beehaws wims

[-] g8phcon2@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

welcome to the fediverse! Before you get "locked in" to a particular instance, take a look at your other choices and pick one that you might fit better in. https://fediverse.observer

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Make an account in another instance, there are lots of them.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

When other instances have abstract requirements and a manual approval process that takes who-knows-how-long, though, that's not always such an easy ask. People want to be where other people are, and those busier instances are the ones that set harder requirements.

When I left Reddit, I signed up on two instances: lemmy.ml and beehaw. I was eventually approved for lemmy.ml, but even now trying to access beehaw just hangs on the login page perpetually, presumably because I have not been approved and there's nothing else I can do on my end.

[-] scubbo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ironic that "accounts will be portable - if you don't like the behaviour, practices, or community of one instance, you can take your data and leave" was touted as the big selling point of the Fediverse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SyJ@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

For context, what has happened?

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think they were using the open sign ups to join and then harass people, a lot of which were in other instances, in particular beehaw.org. Now beehaw has defederated from sh.itjust.works and lemmy.world.

[-] iie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

The issue with this is beehaw is large enough that them defederating from other instances is potentially a serious threat to those instances. Social networks are inherently monopolistic because people follow the crowd, and federation is meant to counteract that tendency toward userbase consolidation. Moves like this could be interpreted as an attempt to become the dominant instance, defeating the purpose of the fediverse.

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I am not 100% sure where you are going with this, however I am going to say I agree that the move by beehaw is a blatent move to exert control on other instances, and it was never in question, in my mind atleast that it was their goal from my reading of their first post. I however disagree that they pose a threat to the other istances, they pose a threat if instances give in, like it apears sh.itjust.works may have done given their new post. Beehaw, sense the begining has been going arround acting like they have quite a bit like they are the arbitor, and everyone else should join them. I for one think the other instances of Lemmy should band together and let Beehaw wall themselves off. I do not think they would sucseed in this goal, and they would either give up on their imperialistic conquest or they would die a death of isolation.

[-] iie@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

it is a threat if users jump ship to beehaw from the smaller instances beehaw has blocked. but when I wrote that comment I wasn't aware that lemmy.world is now three times the size of beehaw, at least according to this tally https://github.com/maltfield/awesome-lemmy-instances. that should counterbalance things.

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I am not sure I have seen, in my time watching beehaw block first justify later, a mass transfer to beehaw before, but I uderstand the potential threat now.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Is there an Out of the Loop thread for this? I'm new here and not sure what's going on.

[-] dingus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Beehaw.org, one of the largest instances suddenly decided to also defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works....

They are becoming an incredibly insular community which would normally be fine...but the frustrating bit is that many of us have been enjoying and participating in content from many instances and then suddenly it gets taken away from us.

If they had defederated from the very beginning or if they were a much smaller community it wouldn't be as frustrating imo.

I just want to be able to interact with people, not keep jumping through hoops to find which instances support other instances and making new accounts there.

[-] Giffen@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Social networks are inherently monopolistic because people follow the crowd, and federation is meant to counteract that tendency toward userbase consolidation.

It's just that network effects are real. I want to be where all the smart, fun people are, not on a ded site or nazi island. I don't really care about who's on my instance, just who's on the network. Federation and decentralization were never huge selling points for me. And as Mastodon demonstrated, most people just want to log onto a big network and don't care or want to think about instances.

[-] naoseiquemsou@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I feel the same. I don't care about the instance, I just want to interact with the communities.

[-] biscuitsofdeath@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I think your point is valid. Federation and decentralization are my main seeking points. i think it's exciting that one instance can cut off instances that aren't working for them. The power to cut off bad actors is huge.

That said I don't understand why they are. They said something about moderation, but I funny know what that means. Creating a safe space for such a large community is tough. Idk.

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You'd be better off without them, they (the runners of the instance, not the userbase) are a bunch of absolutely cowardly little liars. They were more than happy to accept the massive boon this instance gave them and at the same time agitate and concern troll here to try to drive a wedge in the userbase. I find that shit deeply irritating, especially since they claim to be apolitical and merely blocking instances for "hate speech" which (aside from being a political concept) was seemingly the false pretext they have for also blocking hexbear.net, which is currently forked but is the only instance with substantial usership to mandate pronouns and has much more aggressive anti-racist moderation.

If you simper enough, I'm sure they'll be happy to have you back since they seem the type to feel they are never receiving enough sycophantic flattery, but that's a bad trade for you.

[-] AaronMaria@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

If someone claims to be "apolitical" it's a huge red flag, in itself.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Politics affect every little instance of your daily lives, from the taxes you pay, through the type of food you buy (local or imported?), to the sex of people you can get married to.

Being apolitical is just being ignorant.

[-] gylotip@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

The strategy is to just vote and move on. Don't spend too much time on politics.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Can you link to me where Beehaw claims it was apolitical? From the inclusion of LGBTQ+ and feminism, Politics being similar to the politics subreddit, it would seem to me beehaw generally leans left in terms of culture.

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Culturally it trends towards the Democratic Party style of talking a big game about progressivism and then being functionally conservative, but the admins are borderline Thatcherite in their rhetoric.

https://beehaw.org/post/524300

The very first sentence: "Beehaw is a community of individuals and therefore does not have any specific political affiliation."

After acknowledging the first part I said, it continues:

"What we stand for and the space that we’re trying to make is compatible with many forms of politics. Unfortunately some political groups build themselves around and choose to elevate or tolerate hate speech. These are the only political groups that we are incompatible with."

"Some of the instances that we have chosen to defederate with have explicit political stances and ideologies. Their political stance and ideology had nothing to do with the choice to defederate. The choice to defederate was based on the amount of hate speech present on the instance and/or explicitly endorsing it. "

Also, goddam is the post longwinded for a simple lie.

[-] soeren@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago

https://sh.itjust.works/post/107627

Basically, Beehaw defederated from some newer instances. Partially because some people were being shitheads, but for other understandable reasons as well.

The moral of the story is, it's ok to be a sh.it.head, it's not ok to be a shithead. Not the same.

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

hey, I have been here awhile, and while I am not 100% sure the exact issue that triggered this, what I can tell you is generaly the beehaw admin team has shown themselves not to be the most trust worthy team when it comes to lemmy instances, so I would take their story with a grain of salt

[-] BrewJajaja@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But how to pronounce "sh.it"?!

(Weird, don't know why it automatically became a link.)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
22 points (95.8% liked)

Memes

45274 readers
3057 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS