this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
22 points (92.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55076 readers
429 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What are your thoughts on this?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago

In its early days IPFS was being pushed as a anti-censorship tool, obviously blocklists/denylists is the opposite of that. But it's all a moot point, you're linking to a discussion from 2015. AFAIK denylists were already implemented e.g. https://blog.ipfs.tech/2023-content-blocking-for-the-ipfs-stack/

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 4 points 16 hours ago

Denylists itself make sense... Centralized ones absolutely not