this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
298 points (99.0% liked)

News

23655 readers
2599 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former Abercrombie & Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries, facing sex trafficking and interstate prostitution charges, has been diagnosed with dementia and late-onset Alzheimer’s, according to court filings.

Jeffries, 80, and co-defendants allegedly ran an international sex trafficking ring from 2008 to 2015, coercing young men, some financially vulnerable or with ties to Abercrombie, into sex acts for career opportunities.

Prosecutors claim victims were intimidated, drugged, and paid large sums.

Jeffries, under house arrest since October, has pleaded not guilty, with a competency hearing scheduled for June.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

They literally weaponize ethical applications of the law by slowing their court proceedings to basically a standstill. Probably with bribes or other "technically legal" means.

Then they can live their life of luxury all the way up until they're too fucking old to be held accountable for their crimes.

It never ceases to amaze me how much more disgusted I am capable of becoming. Wow.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 12 points 1 day ago

"Sir, how many women did you kidnap and force to be raped"

"idk, I can't remember"

[–] maz1@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Dude looks like he's wearing Gary Busey's face as a mask.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, the Weinstein defence.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago

This weak and frail... mass sexual predator.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 156 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Really weird how all these old rich fucks only ever get "discovered' as pedophiles and rapists at the exact same time they become "mentally unfit to be tried".

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This guy was exposed as a problem decades ago.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago

But he wasn't charged decades ago, point still stands.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Just a series of entirely unrelated coincidences, for sure.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 22 points 1 day ago

Was thinking the same.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago

Then he won’t remember why he’s in prison. Big deal.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This the guy who said that ugly people shouldn't wear his clothes?

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The brand shreds and burns out of season designs so that the poors can’t thrift it often either - that’s why it’s not in places like Burlington or other post season/overstock retailers

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

He's only half right. No one should.

[–] coriza@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ovalofsand@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m 90% sure you’re /s-ing. However, is this an actual hashtag being used? If so…oy vey.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

the whole media coverage of this event has been equivalent to spamming this hashtag.

[–] ovalofsand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I guess it really is necessary because there are so many morons now.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have a modest proposal.

It's unjust to jail someone for someone else's crimes - that's why we don't punish family members...

But it wouldn't put his family members at any sort of disadvantage if we just gave them the same opportunities as average Americans by taking away all their money.

I know it's a thin justification but we as a society really need to kill wealth inheritance.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well everyone who earns money and becomes a millionaire+ deserves every penny so surely if they're so worthy and great people they can rebuild that wealth again!

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

For real, if they are so smart and hard working they can rebuild their wealth as a felon with no help from family or friends. They will have millions in no time!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know it’s a thin justification but we as a society really need to kill wealth inheritance.

That's why we have a tax on inheritance in the first place. It's the only tax that's explicitly confiscatory, and for good reason (to prevent the establishment of an aristocracy).

[–] coriza@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

And of course there is a loop hole for that. If I recall correctly it works like this if you have enough money to have to pay inheritance tax (or it would be a sizeble value) you put it in a trust or company and done, no more tax when your heirs receive the company.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago

Collective Punishment is a crime against humanity

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago

"I do not recall."

Does not mean, "I am innocent"

[–] echutaaa@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good thing knowledge of the law is not requisite to being punished for breaking it..

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not, but being able to understand the charges against you is.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It also challenges the justification for incarceration.

Some jurisdictions have policy specifying incarceration should be preserved to protect community safety, clearly not an issue for an individual who suffers from this disease. Although clearly there are also sentencing guidelines and the community would want this individual sentenced. However, it makes it clearer that the sentence is punitive, which feels justified but does nothing to undo the harm and has a limited impact on future offending by other individuals.

If only public policy served to prevent victimisation in the first place.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Some jurisdictions have policy specifying incarceration should be preserved to protect community safety, clearly not an issue for an individual who suffers from this disease.

I'm sorry, not sure if I read this right.

Are you suggesting that having dimentia makes someone inherently not dangerous? Someone with a history of sex trafficking?

Because that'd be pretty absurd.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No I'm not suggesting it doesn't make them dangerous. Obviously that's a matter of how serious dementia is.

If it's mild it's possible they could be more dangerous not less.

I've lost family members to dementia and when it's quite severe they're unable to even eat, so then obviously they're no danger to society.

I'm simply reflecting on how ineffective our current criminal justice system is. By all means, lock up sex offenders. I just wish we could stop the victimisation from occurring in the first place.

I've also had family members who were victims of child sexual assault, and police just don't give a fuck, let alone social services.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If it's mild it's possible they could be more dangerous not less.

Yeah that was my knee jerk reaction to what I'd read. But I agree with more information fleshing that out :)

[–] PDiddyDo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Can't remember bring a cunt