this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
156 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6791 readers
745 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Credit to Background_Spirit7

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 6 days ago

Given the number of telescope and hyperzoom enthusiasts, I'm surprised we don't have have some good pictures of these drones.

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Other than bullets raining over new jersey, I see no issues

Actually, there are no issues, this seems perfectly fine

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Other than bullets raining over new jersey,

The Air National Guard already had a go at it. I say let the Civil Air Patrol get a chance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strafing_of_the_Little_Egg_Harbor_Intermediate_School

The strafing of the Little Egg Harbor Intermediate School was an incident in Little Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey, United States, in 2004, when a military aircraft on a training mission unintentionally discharged 27 cannon rounds while attempting to operate an aircraft mounted laser.

On Thursday, November 4, 2004, at around 9pm, an F-16 Fighting Falcon jet from the 113th Wing of the District of Columbia Air National Guard, based at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland on a training mission at the Warren Grove Bombing Range was climbing upward at 8,000 feet (2,400 m). The lead pilot was on a training ride in pursuit of an upgrade to instructor pilot. A recent software change in the F-16 allowed the externally mounted targeting pod to stabilize on a spot on the earth when the avionics were in Air to Ground Mode, Strafe Sub-Mode. The pilot intended to fire a laser at a strafe target located on the range. The laser and gun share the same trigger. The pilot pulled the trigger, firing not only the laser but also the internal M61 Vulcan cannon, discharging 27 rounds of 20 mm (0.79 in) ammunition which struck the ground, eight striking the school's roof and the rest hitting the parking lot and the side of the building.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

more bullets than usual raining over New Jersey.

[–] jimbolauski@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Switch to bird shot and only the normal amount of bullets will be raining down on New Jersey.

[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if they switched to shooting sand? Raining sand isn't too deadly, it's not dense enough right? And if it's not lethal enough to the drones, then they can just up the caliber to shoot more sand.

[–] jimbolauski@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Bird shot doesn't hurt when it lands on you, it certainly wouldn't feel good in the eyes. Bird shot goes down to 0.08 inches in diameter there is a smaller shot called snake shot it goes down to 0.053 inches in diameter. Snake shot is typically loaded in rifle cartridges but only has a range of 20 yards so probably not great for shooting drones down.

The EMF noise created by brushlessmotors used by drones can probably be triangulated by some NRO satellite constellation. Just 155 airburst the coordinates, if no other agency claims the drones as property.

[–] erin@social.sidh.bzh 15 points 1 week ago

how dare you say bad things to the best of the best: F-22 never missed, it did it on purpose to trick chinese balloons into thinking F-22 are bad! Now china can send their GDP worth of balloon over USA and F-22 will shoot all of them, burning all of chinese economy into dust: BEST, PLAN, EVER!

shoot first and ask questions later

...

will not be taking any questions

Logical conclusion is to shoot first, full stop. Questions reduce morale and efficiency anyway.

Consider this my application for the Civil Air Patrol drone defence division.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

As a former CAP cadet I approve this plan. The Air Force should approve it immediately!

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm waiting for the infowars-wagons to install cope-cages.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This also has entertaining videogame shooter potential. Low-altitude aerial gun combat sounds like unexplored territory.