this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
222 points (96.2% liked)

News

23655 readers
3495 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Financial experts predicted Jeff Bezos’s move to Florida would pay off handsomely—and they were right. So far, the Amazon founder’s tax savings have been astronomical, worth an estimated $1 billion this year alone.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 145 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 85 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

I have so many hours in smash and totally forgot about this. I'm honestly shocked it hasn't been clipped and posted more.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stop glorifying terrorists. /s

[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

What terrorist? It’s just Luigi

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 93 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"Moving," as though billionaires live in "one place."

All he did was change his primary address, and maybe buy property in Florida.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bought, and then immediately mortgaged the entire value at 0% interest.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago

Easy! All you have to do is buy a mortgage company!

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah I was going to say he didn't move anywhere.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm wondering how that private island community will fare in a few years.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

It's scuba tours all the way down

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In other words: tax evasion. Eat the rich.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It’s called “tax avoidance” when you’re a billionaire and it’s legal

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 27 points 1 week ago

You know what else is legal? Denying healthcare claims automatically. When the laws stop serving the people, don't expect people to follow them out of the goodness of their hearts.

[–] TwanHE@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It's called optimal accounting in my classes. It's not only legal but also annoying as shit when having to audit a company as a project.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 week ago

From what I understand - avoidance is using legal means to avoid paying tax, while evasion is using all the other means to evade getting taxed altogether.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

It's called that if you're not a billionaire and it's legal, too. Taking your personal deduction is tax avoidance.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Washington ... recently enacted a 7% levy on long-term capital gains of more than $250,000

I wonder how many people are actually going to stay in Washington state and pay this. I would definitely move if I were Bezos, and probably even if I had the $250,000 minimum (with the assumption that I was cashing out since I was retiring and so there wasn't a job tying me to any particular location).

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Switzerland has a wealth tax as one of the few countries in the world, and wealthy people are flocking there. I can be done when you do it right.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I thought we might have some cantons without it, but PwC says you're right it's all of Switzerland (the rates vary)

https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/switzerland/individual/other-taxes

[–] 5opn0o30@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Everyone else has to start there due to Amazons RTO policy.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Washington … recently enacted a 7% levy on long-term capital gains of more than $250,000

To complete the picture on that, those that earn more than $533,400/year are subject to long term capital gains rate of 20%.

Example: If you held stock of $30m for more than one year's time, and it increased in value to $50m when you sold it a year later, the capital gain from that sale would be $20m. Because your annual income is almost certainly more than $533,400/year, you'd have to pay 20% tax, on the gain. That tax would be $4m to the federal government and in Washington state, you'd pay a 7% tax on the $20m capital gain of an additional $1.4m to the state of Washington. So a grand total of $5.4m in capital gains if you lived in Washington or $4m if you lived in Florida.

Since his move in early 2024, Bezos has sold an estimated $13.6 billion worth of Amazon stock, according to Forbes.

To those that say that rich people only get loans on assets instead of selling assets and getting capital gains this article disagrees with you. So much so that Bezos tried to escape them. So an increase in capital gains at a federal level would tax these billionaires.

edit: removed one incorrect sentence when I switched my example numbers.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meaning to have a long term capital gain of $250,000 you would have had to sell long term assets that gained more than $12.5m

That is not how this works, any capital gains (which IS the asset values increase) above $250,000 would be subject to the levy regardless of the individuals federal capital gains tax rate.

Your example mostly holds up so I'm not sure if you simply made an error here as you do seem to have a grasp of it.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You're right. I changed my example numbers halfway through writing the post to make it more clear. I thought I got all the old references. I missed that one. I've removed that line now to make a fully accurate post.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fair. Although you aren't really struggling at that amount of wealth, and washington is very very nice.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Couldn't pay me to live in Florida. Hope it falls into the sea.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I moved from Florida to Washington (then later the Midwest). I'll never return to Florida, but am constantly dreaming I'll earn enough to be able to afford Washington again

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Oregon awaits...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Which part, exactly?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you sell your house for $250K more than you bought it you may well be struggling. For example, if you bought it 30 years ago for $20K and have to sell it for $300K because you have no income

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

This does not affect returns from a primary residence sale.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would stay. I have no issue paying taxes as I believe it is for the betterment of society.

My issue is others not paying their fair share and that doesn’t mean I would join them if I couldn’t beat them.

I'm proud in a way of how much I pay in taxes. It makes me feel like more of a productive member of society. However, if there was something completely legal and relatively easy which I could do to reduce the amount of taxes I paid, I don't think doing it would be contrary to the notion of paying my fair share. Washington gets to set its tax policy, and I get to choose where I live. IMO, leaving Washington because of its tax policy has no moral implications. It's no different than leaving because I don't like the weather.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Canada enacted a capital gains tax and nobody moved (though obviously it's harder to move countries)

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...you don't cash out your entire retirement accounts but when you retire.

250k in capital gains, and instead of the usual 10%, you're paying 17% on it. Because that's a shit ton of stock to sell in one year

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

…you don’t cash out your entire retirement accounts but when you retire.

No but you might move your money to a different, lower-risk investment. With that said, my post was poorly-written and the part about retirement was extraneous. I should have just said

with the assumption that there wasn’t a job tying me to any particular location

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Moving money within a retirement account, or even between retirement accounts does not incur capital gains, either.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Quite a few. That still works out to being cheaper than having to pay states income tax on most states and Washington is a hell of a lot nicer than the states that don't tax income. Also, this affects very few people.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I left California because it charged the same rate on capital gains. Like you could owe nothing federally, but have to pay state income tax. It was also more annoying because I had to mail it! 12 pages don't fit into an envelope so I didn't even send them my full return

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh no. A rich person had to pay taxes on their gambling and it was annoying. The horror.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The point isn't that you should feel sorry for him. It's that he didn't pay the tax but did take his money elsewhere. I don't think California benefits when that happens.