this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
192 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2434 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

A full-scale invasion of Syria by Turkey, without any political adjustments to the situation, would mean Turkish troops seizing land currently co-held (together with the AANES / SDF) by American troops. Without coordination, Turkish drone and artillery strikes would land near US troops, which would call in reinforcements to remove the drones and artillery.

Needless to say, one NATO ally going at territory held by another is a pretty bad idea.

So, in some parts of Syria, proceeding with their plan requires a US president - and most likely not Biden - to give them the green light and withdraw US special forces from SDF land. Basically, it requires the US to screw its allies in the fight against the Islamic State. Which would not be out of character for Trump, since Kurds cannot "pay him for protection". The protection was based on principles (the Autonomous Administration of North-Eastern Syria was the only player in the region that tried sticking to democracy and human rights) and a common enemy (ISIS).

I hope all of this doesn't happen, but if I were the Kurds, I'd be keeping drone batteries charged and knocking on every diplomatic door for assistance.

In case of things hitting the fan, it might be useful to remember a link to the Kurdistan Red Crescent - Heyva Sor a Kurdistanê. (They can't supply drone batteries, but deliver medical and humanitarian aid to the region.)

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 33 points 1 week ago

Which would not be out of character for Trump, since Kurds cannot "pay him for protection".

It's not just in character for Trump, it's something he has already done. He abandoned the Kurds in 2019 when Turkiye launched an offensive against them

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 19 points 1 week ago

They're going to co-ordinate with the Americans. Erdogan is going to ask Trump "can I go kill some Kurds on Syria", and Trump will go "sure". That's what happened last time.

Tbh this is precisely how I expect things to play out over the next couple months. And I fucking hate it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Biden hasn't proved to be an ally either. He might not support Turkey but he isn't going to allow US troops to return fire. It will be like the UN Outposts Israel just goes around.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As far as I know, procedures for returning fire don't require calling the president. There already was an incident about a week ago - they just shot down the drone that threatened them.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Basic stuff like that they can do. But stray artillery rounds aren't going to get a response. Anything more than their rifle or short range anti air requires permission from higher up. And even those are on a short leash because the local commander will be under orders to hold fire unless they're actually attacked.

On the other side there will be an American officer telling the Turks exactly where American troops are and acting as the first line of deconfliction if there are any mistakes. Turkey will listen to that officer because of the balance of power in the US-Turkey relationship and the knowledge that the US is capable of disabling their entire military overnight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Watch the US abandon them too, after basically using them to squash ISIS. A concern though, is Turkey won’t want to hold territory, so it’ll end up creating the same power vacuum that spawned ISIS after it drives the Kurds out. A better solution would be for the US to just broker a deal between all parties.

[–] guy@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You sure about them not wanting to hold territory?
I can imagine the Turks keeping the "safety zone", not to annex as a part of Turkey, but keep subdued to make sure the Kurds don't try to come back

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Turkey wants HTS to take full control of the Syria land so they don't have to deal with PKK's sidearm right next to their borders in the first place. This whole operation is made for that.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Turkey would love to expand their borders. They already exist on a war footing because they insist on treating domestic Kurds like Native Americans were treated and sending military expeditions into northern Iraq and Syria. The only difference would be staying there.

[–] MrFappy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That happened already and it fell apart yesterday.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well, more of a long term solution is needed than a temporary cease fire.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Shock.

Surprise.

For those who don't know, Turkey hates the Kurdish people. Iraq and Iran are too powerful for them to go after the Kurds very well there. The SDF along the northern border of Syria is Kurdish and is unprotected. Expect no quarter by either side. The Turks will also kill civilians if they get into population centers. This enmity runs to the Ottoman Empire who also mistreated the Kurds in favor of the Turks. When Ataturk turned to focus on the Kurds after the Armenian Genocide the Kurds took up arms rather than be next.

The SDF previously relied on the stalemate of the war to not be bothered by NATO. But with that over and Trump returning (who gave the Turks the greenlight to occupy sections of Syria last time) it's obviously time for the Turks to go after the Kurds again. Because God forbid the Kurds actually get self determination and peace.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The kurds have been one of the most betrayed people by the West. They were one of the only ones to put themselves directly in front of the ISIS hordes. Men and women fought and lost their lives to stop ISIS from spreading their reign of terror even further. The West promised in turn to help them gain their territorial autonomy. After defeating ISIS the Americans then pulled out of all of their promises to the Kurds, abandoning them, and are now actively supporting Turkey in destroying the kurdish autonomous region. What an utterly disgusting move on their part, and surely telling for all the movements looking to collaborate with them in the future.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

And that's after being abandoned after fighting Saddam Hussein as well.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

The main reason why turkey supported HTS is this right here. Watch as the country continues getting broken into many pieces and eaten up by these vultures.

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait. I thought Turkey was happy about so many Syrian refugees leaving. And now they're following them to bring more war? WTF?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

The Turks can always make room for killing more Kurds.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

A new dictator takes the land, amazing

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (27 children)

Yeah, Turkey has never liked the Kurds

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Everyone in the region seems to fear the formation of a Kurdish state. :(

So much that Kurds can spend 24/7 assuring they only want autonomy within some provinces, and every neighour still has nightmares of an independent Kurdistan...

...which, to be fair, they should have got - when the Ottoman empire fell apart - but everyone kind of forgot them.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Less "forgot" and more "decided by European powers that it wasn't up to anyone non-white to be in charge." At least not in the British and French Mandate areas.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I have met more good Kurds than good Turks while I have met a lot more Turks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Juigi@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

War mongering Turkey what a shock

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Oh, for fuck's sake-

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Fash gonna fash.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Nice truck. Hammond should take it to a McDonald's sometime.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

One of the reasons I've been boycotting imports from Türkiye for years.

load more comments
view more: next ›