this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
347 points (90.8% liked)

Lord Of The Rings Memes

210 readers
271 users here now

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Indiana Jones 3 is as good, if not better, than any other movie in the series.

[–] ElmarsonTheThird@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Way better than Temple of Doom for sure!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Back to the Future 3 is nowhere near on par with 2.

This is some ragebait right here

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wtf do you mean, part 3 is awesome and has some of the best humor in the series. Sure it's a bit derivative, but that doesn't stop it from being a better 3rd in a trilogy than most others. It's also got a lot of quotable moments, I quote this for just about anything that's hot

Well, I suppose if you had a straight stretch of track with a level grade, and you weren't haulin' no cars behind you, and if you can get the fire hot enough, and I'm talkin' about hotter than the blazes of hell and damnation itself... then yes

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

1 and 2 are about even. 3 is a little lower than them, but not by much.

The first two really are parts 1 and 2 of a story. The 3rd completely changes the scenery, which gives some people the impression it's not as good. It is though , and it ends the story well.

Then there's the fun fact that parts 2 and 3 were filmed at the same time. So the impression the films give is backwards from how they were made.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm considering it better. Not that part 2 is bad, but I like part 3 more.

[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I disagree with the Indiana Jones ratings. The third movie was better than the second, and possibly better than the first too.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hmm for me 1 and 3 are about equal (both fantastic), but 2 is my least favourite.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Awman, I didn't think matrix 2 and 3 where that bad.
I remember enjoying them.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They made viewers work to understand. Viewers largely rejected that.

Which has led us, irrevocably, to spoon fed trash that plays to the dumbest person in the audience.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't understand why people dislike those movies so much. Even enjoyed the 4th one.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They didn't deliver on the promises that Neo made at the end of the first movie. They're quite different than the first film. The 4th one was an obvious cash grab by the studios. The Wachowskis didn't want to make the movie, and they straight-up tell the audience in the movie that they were forced to do it, or let someone else do it.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The fourth was sort of hilarious on that point. HERE'S YOUR STUPID MOVIE! I'd have been pissed if I was expecting something different, but I laughed my ass off.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 23 points 1 week ago

I don't agree with most of those.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 22 points 1 week ago

The bars for the LOTR trilogy are only that scale because of how long the movies are.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In what world is die hard 3 worse than die hard 2. It’s arguably tied with die hard 1 as the best one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

LOTR is the same as star wars. First one is 95%, second is 100%, third is 80%. Way too much climbing and whining in the third one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Blade is definitely better than Blade 2 IMO.

I might pick Die Hard 3 over 2 as well, but it's been a bit since I saw 2.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Die Hard 3 is commonly thought of as one of the good ones. The other one is DH1.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

DH2 isn’t very memorable outside of ~2 key moments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lorindol@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I am fully aware I'm pretty much alone with my opinion, but I find Terminator 1 far superior to T2.

Even with the limited budget T1 manages to create a far more horrifying vision of an unstoppable killer coming after you. The lo-fi'ish synth soundtrack sets a perfect oppressive feeling. The casting is perfect, Michael Biehn' s scarred and wiry Reese with Hamilton's young and scared next door girl going against metal-Arnold in his prime is the epitome of underdog scenarios.

And the pacing is very good, the plot flows.

T2 is a good film, but like many sequels, it suffers from the "let's do the same thing from a different angle, but bigger and louder!" - syndrome. It doesn't really get to be it's own kind of beast. I was very surprised that Cameron fell for the trap, after he avoided that mistake with "Aliens". Switching genre from space horror to space action made that film stand firmly on it's own feet and the result was good.

Lastly, T2 has the young John Connor doing the "badass kid" - role, which so many seem to love. I just find the character annoying.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

I agree with you!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The meme is funny, I'm going to acknowledge that first.

But what are these rankings? Indiana Jones 3 is ranked the same quality as 2. Spider-Man 1 is ranked demonstrably worse than 2. Jurassic Park 3 is ranked work than Jurassic Park 2????

I know it comes down to a matter of opinion but I also have to wonder if the person who originally created this meme watched the movies, because those are some spicy takes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jayk@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I must protest this mistreatment of spiderman 3

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

1! = 1

I'm disappointed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Back to the Future is, as a whole, the best trilogy on this list.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Strong disagree on Back to the Future. The last one's probably the best one

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] deus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't wait for Dune 3. If Villeneuve sticks the landing his trilogy will become for Sci-fi what LotR is for fantasy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Terminator is a strange one. Cooked with the first movie, second one is somehow even better and then the third one is absolute ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

This is bait.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Last Crusade is better than Raiders. Fight me.

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

What about side by side with a friend?

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Two towers is the weak link

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] addie@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cruelly overlooked: getting Tremors 1, 2, 3 and Highlander 1, 2, 3 onto this chart.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 9 points 1 week ago

...yeah, no...

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kinda telling how many of these are Spielberg, movie making beast

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

really ought to make people realize that letting people do what they're passionate about results in amazing products, this is how we got the london tube map as well.

[–] SharpieThunderflare@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

I know it doesn't fit the trilogy thing, but you left out the best Rocky movie: Rocky IV.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I love all three Godfather movies.

The Godfather, The Godfather II Part 1, and The Godfather II Part 2

That other one doesn’t exist as far as I’m concerned.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of those crappy trilogies were not written all at once the way LOTR was. The more common case of writing follow-ups to cash in on the popularity of the original is a time-honoured way to make money while producing derivative garbage.

I feel like we need a different word to separate those “cash grab” trilogies from proper multi-part stories like LOTR.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 6 points 1 week ago

Personally I enjoyed matrix 3 more than 2.

The Star Wars one could also apply to the sequels, keep the proportion but maybe lower by half? Ep. 8 certainly was the least bad.

load more comments
view more: next ›