this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
230 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1765 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Canadian leaders, particularly Ontario Premier Doug Ford, are considering retaliatory measures against Trump’s tariff threats, including restricting U.S. alcohol imports and cutting electricity exports to 1.5 million American homes.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has remained relatively calm despite Trump’s provocations, but Ontario’s response signals rising tensions.

Analysts warn that Trump’s tariff policies could provoke significant economic retaliation from Canada, disrupting key cross-border energy supplies and trade.

The situation highlights the potential fallout from escalating U.S.-Canada trade disputes under the incoming administration.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As an American I entirely support this move. No matter what we're gonna have a shit 4 years and hopefully the worse it is the less credibility they'll have heading into the next two elections.

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago

That's be nice but the propaganda is such that they get to blame everyone else even when they're in power. My bet is the worse they crash the country, the harder they'll double down, and the more tolerance their base will have for them to do truly heinous shit to the groups they vilify (ie trans people and immigrants)

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As an American from a state trying to import more Canadian hydro, yeah

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Depends entirely on who the dems float as their next direction. If its Shpapiro or Blinken or Harris again then we're just as boned-- 4, 8,and 16 years from now as we are today. It needs to be someone truly progressive and not under the old guard DNC's corrupt thumb. Theres still an entire court system to make neutral again -- we dont have the time for slimy centrist deal makers making halfwitted deals while climate, health care, the economy, elections, justice, and the western alliance are actively on fire and dying every day.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I fucken hate Trump so much. Literally no reason to do this shit except to weaken US trade.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Exactly. Want to fight China? Do it together with other allies and put tariffs on things you actually produce yourself and don't want China to get competitive edge on, like for example EVs.

If you fight with allies you are weakening yourself and make China stronger.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It makes a lot more sense when you accept that he’s purposely serving Putin. As if by coercion.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You think turnip can think that far? All he's worried about is his image, and if people cheer for him when doing [insert any fucking moronic thing you can think about], his base will cheer him on.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You think turnip can think that far?

Trump is just Putin's hand-puppet muppet. I imagine Putin can think that far ahead.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

China is already ahead on EV production and adoption.

The US has space and AI and the latter hasn't produced anything meaningful, besides accelerating enshittification.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a nation we decided to fuck around; it's time we found out.

I'm really hoping the rest of the world follows Canada's thinking here and just doesn't put up with the US's bullshit. 4 years of standing in the corner with a dunce hat is exactly what we need.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Im in NZ and we’re not putting up with your bullshit. Cheers mate.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How dumb is Trump that he doesn’t understand basic trade? We have X. Canada has Y. We exchange one for the other. Add or subtract from the deal for the other guy and the same will happen for you.

Where are the people who will lose on that energy transfer?

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You’re referring to a guy who has made a fairly successful* career ripping people off and not paying his bills.

* Success as measured by the fact that a) he’s not in jail and 2) he’s the potus… again.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought Elon Musk was POTUS by proxy.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are we saying Former Husband to Pop Star Grimes is the real President? Cause I imagine that would annoy Trump.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

He bought Trump for $134 million. Cheap, for him.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

The goal is to collapse the system.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To answer your last question. Everyone.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

1.5 million powered by ontario, so the people in ontario lose to. If quebec follows suit, then more people suffer.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We have X. Canada has Y.

X's and Y's? I'm having high school flashbacks over here. I dont know whether to orgasm or cry.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As the old saying goes: it seems like Canada has been talking softly, but carrying a big stick.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

More like a big switch. ;-)

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Exports of electricity to the United States, millions of megawatt-hours

2022

Quebec 22.6

Ontario 15.7

BC 12.1

Manitoba 10.4

Ontario's powers 1.5 million houses. That's about 6 million houses total.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh, it's interesting that all but Ontario are predominantly Hydro on that list Ontario's Nuclear 1st, then Hydro.

Source if anyone's interested, can go into specific provinces.

[–] Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Ontario happens to have been where a lot of joijt research facilities for nuclear energy were started. The US and Canada invested a lot of money into southern ontario nuclear plants and enrichment centres during and after ww2.

The other provinces have great geography that allows for Hydro to work. Ontario happens to be really geologically stable so it's prime real-estate for Nuclear plants.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Good. Fuck trump. Fuck us for voting him in. We deserve this.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Good for Ontario. The first step to countering whats going on in the US is to reject their narrative and framing in more or less everything, and draw your own. Each person has to do this, and Ontario doing it first certainly makes a pattern for the rest of us to follow. We've let them define the language and terms around politics for far too long, and we need regime change from our abysmal two party oligarchy system.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Won't this just get the orange to push even more for drilling and further harm the environment and climate?

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Won’t this just get the orange to push even more for drilling and further harm the environment and climate?

It's up to the oil companies whether they drill more and they don't want to because it would cause prices to go down.

"I don't know that there's an opportunity to unleash a lot of production in the near term... I don't think today that production in the U.S. is constrained." - ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods (source)

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True. And there's only so much the US can do. At the end of the day, OPEC can just raise or lower production to destroy any US policy.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We're a net exporter of oil now - 10.15 million bbl per day vs 8.51 imported. And now only 16% of that comes from OPEC countries vs 52% from Canada. tl;dr OPEC has nowhere near the influence on our oil prices it once had.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The margin of profit on tar sands oil is razor thin. So Canada needs to be kept happy or we're back under Saudi Arabias sway. Trump will not keep Canada happy.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe not the same influence they once had, but every one of those producers can destroy the market on their own if they wanted to. That said, oil will overall be far less important over the coming decades as transportation and manufacturing move away from fossil fuels. Europe is very far along the way on that already.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"...but every one of those producers can destroy the market on their own if they wanted to."

Depending on what you mean by "destroy the market" that doesn't make any sense.

The rest I totally agree with.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What I mean by that is that if OPEC (or any of the other big producers) decided to cut all of their production for a long period of time (e.g. a year), it would completely destroy the world market and the other players would be able to do nothing about it. It would simply take so much supply away that prices would go crazy.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

...it would completely destroy the world market

I have to disagree with that, both the premise that they would and the result.

It would simply take so much supply away that prices would go crazy.

Is that what you mean by "destroy the market"? Because if prices "go crazy" the oil companies make bank and the reduced production doesn't matter, to them anyway. In addition, this would push EV and renewables adoption pretty hard and since those are now extremely viable alternatives, cutting production to raise prices, as OPEC has done for decades, would not have the effect it used to.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

trumpi is just pen-testing at the moment. seeing where he can grift the most, and where people will resist. Ford and Trudeau know that the US has lots to lose, and they are making that clear to trumpi, i.e., Go ahead and shoot yourself in the foot if you want to, but Canadians won't suffer for your foolishness. Always stand up to bullies.

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I didn't vote for him and I'll be fine, but I know a few people who voted for him who won't be.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Meanwhile, the CAQ in Quebec is kissing his ass. Absolutely shameful. No wonder they're the least popular elected provincial party in Canada. I can't wait for the next elections to kick them to the curb.

[–] jinarched@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, the last election's results were devastating. Now, most people seem to be sick of Legault.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

To be replaced by the corrupted liberals or the xenophobic pq. We are doomed.

[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I can't stand Ford, but this would be a good move.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

It's literally dead, and has been for a few years now.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I gotta buy more Bills Zubaz-patterned Labatt's cans before they get Tariffed away ...

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ontario and their leader Ford can shut the fuck up for being vocal in supporting Trump.