this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
163 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2490 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. State Department spokesperson told reporters on Thursday that the United States disagrees with Amnesty International’s new report accusing Israel of carrying out genocide in the Gaza Strip.

“We disagree with the conclusions of such a report,” spokesperson Vedant Patel said a day after the human rights group released the document. “We have said previously and continue to find that the allegations of genocide are unfounded.”

In the 296-page report released Wednesday—titled, “You Feel Like You Are Subhuman”: Israel’s Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza—Amnesty International found through its research and legal analysis “sufficient basis to conclude that Israel committed, during the nine-month period under review, prohibited acts under Articles II (a), (b), and © of the Genocide Convention, namely killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and deliberately inflicting on Palestinians in Gaza conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction in whole or in part.”

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 70 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This 296 page report is unfounded. No, we will not elaborate. Thank you

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 weeks ago

Unfounded is strong. More like it doesn't sync with our vibes today.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 56 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is the kind of banana-republic reality-denial kangaroo-court state department people expected under Trump.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I expected nothing from Democrats and I'm still let down.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

'I Disagree With Your Disagreement': Deceptichum Dismisses Routine Biden Administration Defense Of Genocide.

About as meaningful a statement, the US has zero credibility to throw around here.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago

Said the most powerful country in the world, “nuh-uh! "

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

They're not dumb. They know what they're doing. Their goal is genocide

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Of course we do, the US has been literally designed to be Israel's body guard. On the global stage, we are the equivalent to the big, dumb henchman who doesn't think or care about his own interests as long as his boss is protected

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

..cause it's inconvenient.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This clown was funnier when he was on SNL.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, Joe has a month. Couldn't just be like, yeah, it's a genocide.

Sheesh. Final deflating feeling I guess.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well how else do you go about conducting a war?