this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
135 points (96.6% liked)

News

23655 readers
3495 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 88 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Seems like giving the non shit-hole states to Canada would make everyone happier.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's call it "Greater America"

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago

Greater Canada

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In this timeline, Canada getting invaded is definitely on the bingo card. The future is absolutely going to shit.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They've stopped asking if they should invade Mexico and have moved on to how much should they invade Mexico. This timeline is terrible

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Where would the US be without a perpetual war in a desert?

It’s basically a national tradition at this point.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or, dissolve the United States and create an EU like union of North American nation states in its place.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I give it a year before red states beg to be part of a blue country. Most of them can't support themselves without money from other states.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Something tells me the last thing diehard MAGAs want is another California.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think Canada has started catching our cancer, unfortunately.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

If someone told you that you currently pay $6,551 per person to receive completely covered full healthcare, and if you become a state your healthcare goes up to $12,555 per person and you will have to pay for your appointment, the first $5,000 before anything is covered and if the issue is bad enough you will pay the overhead. Also drugs prices are way higher, so get ready for those as well.

Would you vote for that?

those numbers are 2022 Canada/U.S. per capita costs for healthcare. Doesn't include the private sector costs added in for the U.S.

WAIT, that doctor isn't in your network, sorry.. you went to the wrong emergency room. I know you were unconscious but have fun sorting out which surgeons, MRIs, equipment, room fees, ambulance fees, personal trainers were covered.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ontarians and Albertans are already voting for Conservatives to dismantle their healthcare, and Canadians are about to vote in the furthest right Conservative federal government ever. As a wise man once said, people like Coldplay and voted for Hitler. You can't trust people.

I really must not know enough about Coldplay... Lol. Straight up there with Hitler... Shit. And here I just thought they played music like Coheed and Cambria. Then again I can't name any of their songs either.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Would you vote for that?

I'm afraid that's a trick question these days. I thought that was all pretty well handled up till this last election...

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Would you vote for that?

That all depends on what some hacky wannabe-comedian meathead douchebag says about it between ads on his podcast. /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, right wing crazy seems to be the United States number one export.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I bet the number of Canadians willing to give up their healthcare plans is far less than 50% for our fucked up system.

Canada becoming a state would immediately see the Republican party removed from office, and the Majory vote being far further in favor of health care reform. Aka they would vote in only senators and Congressmen who supported it. Now if they wanted to make sure the 39m people didn't have more say than Texas, they would have to divide it into multiple states. This would create more senator positions as well, meaning more non Republican senators who block health care reform.

Not only would Canada never support it, but it is clear that Trump never knows what the fuck he is on about.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Don't assume Canadians are well informed. The right-wing media and the Conservatives lie to Canadians too, and people believe what they're told. In Ontario they have voted in, and voted back in, a government that is determined to dismantle public healthcare, and the voters seem not to even notice. At the federal level the Conservatives dishonestly blame the federal government for issues they know are provincial government matters, and people go along with that too and are all set to elect the Conservatives despite their having no positive proposals or intentions. Voters are easily duped.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 weeks ago

Getting some strong Fallout vibes from this story.

[–] Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

What about Greenland? Don't let that dream die, Donny!

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The right is absolutely pissing its pants about this.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

Cost of new housing goes waaay up. Canada is lumber.

[–] poo@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whithom 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That mexico threat doesn’t mean a war, but if you threaten another nato country, you’re gonna have your ass handed to you.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If the USA invaded Canada, Canada would not be able to defend itself. Thankfully that idea has been unthinkable for a long time, but as the USA goes fascist, climate change kicks in and the water starts to run out, I could see that changing one day.

[–] whithom 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If the US attempted to invade another NATO country, the weight of NATO would come down. The US is not in a position to take over allied countries.

Mexico, on the other hand, would be like Russia invading Ukraine.

None of this is good for the people.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What is the weight of NATO without the USA? Especially against the USA?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Everyone's economy would collapse and we would all starve.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

All that snow and ice up there will melt, Canada will have plenty of water to hold over the US' head.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

That's what I mean: the USA will be coming for Canada's water.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

That'll be a great first line for the history book chapter "Beginning of the Water Wars"

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago

Trump would cut off his nose to spiderface.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ignore him, until he does anything

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even so, it feels like Canada has to reconceive the purpose and scale of its military defenses. The USA can't be trusted to always be an ally.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Definitely stop buying their weapon systems. Support EU and diversify

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Fox News is saying that the tariff “threat” has made Canada and Mexico to act on stopping the illegal immigration happening at the borders and that’s how Trump gets the job done, even before he is in office. I have not fact checked so I don’t know how much of it is a coincidence and how much the Canadian and Mexican government are freaking out about drug and illegal immigration control.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Mexico has already acted to reduce illegal immigrants entering the USA over its border by 76%, while Trump was lying about the problem being worse. None of it has anything to do with Trump, and he's just making effective cooperative action more difficult with his bluster and threats.

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/mexico-stick-with-policies-aimed-stopping-migrants-after-trump-win-2024-11-08/

Illegal immigration into the USA from Canada has increased but the numbers remain very small. Trump is lying when he claims it's a big problem.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/illegal-migration-canada-united-states-1.7320623

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Fox Entertainment doesn't know shit about the acts of Canada, Mexico's, or even the U.S. actions pertaining to drugs or immigration. Theyve proven it over and over. They just gargle whatever bullshit they get the most money for and try not to puke while word vomiting it at the populous.

[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

The only truth would be that fox is changing the narrative. No matter what actually happens.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

Oh god, please dont give Danielle Smith any ideas

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

They could take each province and make them states. Don't think that will work out for Republicans

load more comments
view more: next ›