this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
1866 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

6036 readers
2170 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 172 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Don't forget with the Recall feature, you may be on Linux and are using a secure communication application, but if who you are talking to is on windows your conversation can be scraped.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 94 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Same thing with email. It's all well and good if you're using ProtonMail or Tuta or Posteo, but you're still cooked if the other side is using Gmail.

Old problems, new modi operandi.

[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Afaik, with proton you can send messages that won't open through gmail if you protect them with a password. The other person receives a message with a link to open the mail in a browser after entering the password. It's not the easiest solution but if you want to avoid gmail from knowing the contents of a message, you can do that.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But windows recall scrapes your screen, so even that wouldn't work.

[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 22 points 1 month ago

"But they are stored locally! Certainly, Microsoft won't have access to those, right? Right???"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 42 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It's not like companies that use Linux don't get breached either. Your personal data is in thousands of databases that have varying levels of security. Personal choices don't affect any of that, regulations like GDPR are what's needed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago (5 children)

But does your medical clinic do?

No, they don't, and it pisses me off. Every time I see it, I think, Well, there goes my medical privacy.

But where else can I go? There's only one health company in town, and they bought all the doctor's offices.

Who can I complain to? The doctors and nurses are visibly frustrated with Windows every time I see them use it. If they can't change it, how could I?

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

That ship has sailed anyway. I've had no less than 5 breach notifications show up in the mail from things related to my health care in the last 2 years, and it's not like I'm constantly at the doctor. The whole system is a disaster.

[–] groet@feddit.org 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They might not know there are alternatives. So they likely do not ccomplain to their IT person.

Dont be a "jUsT uSe LiNuX" guy, but when you see them frustrated maybe say "hey I see you are frustrated as well and I as a patient are concerned about my medical data privacy. You know there are better and safer alternatives, maybe you could ask your IT if it would be possible to switch to Linux?"

Realistically, they can't switch because the software to use some $€1m medical device only runs on windows.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 62 points 1 month ago (4 children)

i use linux and don’t have family or friends or get any kind of medical care ☺️ checkmate

[–] Zink@programming.dev 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Using Linux in America be like

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The failures of the United States healthcare system are compatible with the Unix philosophy due to its emphasis on doing one thing poorly and leaving the rest for the user to figure out. Like Unix tools, each component—insurance, billing, and treatment—functions independently, refusing to communicate effectively while relying on the user to “pipe” themselves between endless calls, paperwork, and escalating bills. Debugging your health, much like debugging code, requires advanced knowledge, infinite patience, and a willingness to accept that nothing will ever be fully resolved.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] savx@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

privacy is scary stuff if you think. it's like, i care so i dont share my phone number with facebook, but someone out there may have my number/address/name on their contact list and chances are big that they have no problem sharing with zuck. so i'll still end up on zuck's database.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just activated my checking account with PayPal and one of the questions from the verification battery was asking me which email I recognized. They were different domains of my mother's ISP email that she uses only with Amazon.

I had the urge to answer incorrectly as if that would remove their association.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Demand it from who? With what power or leverage?

Not to be defeatist, but I'm just a guy. Nobody's gonna listen to my demands. I'm surprised privacy notifications say anything other than "You don't have any" with two buttons that both say "OK". All I can do is selfhost as much as possible and decline to use tons of applications or services that underpin modern societal functions or social activities. So I do. But it sucks ass and I don't have any power to change any of it.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 22 points 1 month ago

Where I am, unlike climate change, the privacy issue is not discussed properly so just explaining it to people that trust you can boost any future systemic action.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Legislature. GDPR was a good step.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, but the point they're trying to make is, I think, that the more you complain, the more other people complain and the more other people start complaining and unless we have enough complainers and people switching, nothing is gonna change.

Our power is imperceptible but not non-existent

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What drives me nuts about this subject is rarely spoken about.

No single company can properly compensate all of their users for the damages caused by mishandling their personal data.

In fact the damages may even be too great for the government to properly compensate said users.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] parpol@programming.dev 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think people who say "I don't care, I use Linux" are really saying "You should use Linux to stop this."

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate to be that guy, but they may not be aware of alternatives.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Im sure the receptionist in the doctors surgery cant wait to have that conversation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mojave@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"does your medical clinic do"

Bring back grammar nazis

[–] hakase@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

This is common in British English.

For example, the question "Are you going into town?" might be answered by an American with, "I might," and by a Brit with "I might do". In past tense it would be "I might have" vs. "I might have done".

This is all perfectly systematic and grammatical - this person just has a different grammar than you do. Though I guess that's what Nazis do best: enforcing arbitrary standards in systems they don't understand to destroy diversity to everyone's detriment.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They might not be native English speakers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Microw@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Not a native speaker here, what would be correct?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

"Does your medical clinic use Linux?" or just "Does your medical clinic?"

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 month ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (5 children)

No, you need to demand that government organizations use Linux or other open source systems as well, there is no other way.

You can require Microsoft to comply with rules, it won't. It doesn't care, it wants money, and more money, and that is it. It's been like that since it's inception. The same goes for all other tech companies

You know what brand doesn't careuch about money and will respect your privacy?

Open source software. Linux. Firefox (eh, mostly) with plugins, mariadb, etc...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm still pissed the email I had managed to keep junk free for years was leaked because my insurance company had a breach.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 month ago

Simplelogin/anonaddy

That having been said, keeping an email "private" is roughly as silly as people who think phone numbers are private, as if the white pages never existed.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think there's some confusion at play here. That argument is about security, not privacy.

Is the concern that Microsoft is ingesting your data and thus your actions aren't private? Or is it that Windows is not secure and so you don't think data stored in Windows systems is safe from third party access? That distinction matters, because in both cases the way it's framed here isn't really accurate but for different reasons.

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago (9 children)

And both arguments are valid. However, when discussing privacy with somebody "who has nothing to hide", the security concerns argument usually holds more ground.

"Fine, you don't mind microsoft and their 961 partners to know about your computer usage patterns. But how about the criminals which will have your data as well? You may trust microsoft with your data - "because they have it already" - but do you trust each of these 961 partners? Do you trust all their privacy policies? I have read some. They are horrendus and allow sharing with third parties. Do you trust their privacy and security?"

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a home user the OS thing is preference, some prefer Windows, some Mac, some Linux, etc.

Your post however raises a good point, and it certainly makes me form an opinion in a greater context. Thanks for making me think about this, genuinely - it's good to have opinions challenged.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beanlink_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Until there is serious consequences to data breaches and criminal charges it doesn't matter. It's been a free for all for a long time the best we can do is simply keep using products or services that respect your privacy and discourage or not use services.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Does your company/school provide employee/student Microsoft 365 licences? Ask your Windows-using colleague to check that "Optional Connected Experiences" are enabled and tell the IT team that they are likely allowing genAI training on internal documents (Microsoft seems to have reserved the right to do that and never denied the allegations). Yes, they can disable this organization-wide and will likely contact Microsoft over this, and if enough of us do this they'll know they crossed a line.

If your company's IT team does not respond, you'll have another argument getting your peers over to LibreOffice.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Maybe we should tell people to use Linux

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is framed with OSs in mind but the place where this actually happens the most is mobile apps.

It's difficult to protect your contact info when everyone with you in their contracts gives access to candy crush. It's the one I see the most and know who does it because those people will show up in the "you might know this person" shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grail@aussie.zone 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure we all know that. I've been using Linux full time for about 8 years now. I'm also EXTREMELY aware that I can't change what OS an organization runs. It's a systemic problem.

load more comments
view more: next ›