this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
189 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2401 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 72 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I used to say there's no way in hell anyone would ever get me onto a cruise ship, but this is enticing.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But it's just a different kind of hell

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And an expensive one at that.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago

Depending on where you live, rent/mortgage is generally 20-30k a year for people who can even consider this. Add in utilities, property tax, etc and it is not that much higher. And if any meal plans are included in this, it is potentially cheaper than what a lot of the FIRE crowd would be expecting to pay.

That said: After cruise ships became literal plague ships in 2020, I do not know why ANYONE gets on a frigging cruise anymore.

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago

And an expensive one at that.

Isn't that ... special?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

$40k a year sounds super reasonable.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

That's per person, double occupancy. Going alone is $64k.

But it does include meals, housekeeping biweekly, port fees and taxes, and all the amenities on the ship. Honestly not bad, if you can sell your house and downsize into a suitcase.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 7 points 1 month ago

Maybe for a cruise of that duration, yeah. I'm just comparing it against what I make in a year and how much it currently costs me to live in a house on land.

I could afford to make it an "or" situation but not an "and".

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

$40k a year is probably for a tiny inside cabin with no window, and only enough room for a week's worth of clothes. And no permanent address, if you want something that is not available on the boat you will have to figure out how to get it at the next port.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can order amazon deliveries to most cruise ships now. They have onboard ~~slaves~~ valued team members and a desk where you can pick up your packages, and amazon handles the logistics of getting stuff onto the boat. I fucking hate them all the more because of how impressed I am by this truly astonishing feat of logistical engineering. I guess it makes sense that they could do this though, since amazon already has installations at pretty much every port in the world this isn't much of an investment on their part.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People who can afford cruises aren't going to be the ones disproportionately affected by Trump's policies.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago

Economic policies, sure. But there are social policies and perhaps more importantly a culture of intolerance that can affect people over a wide range of economic status.

I think I'd just add "straight white people" to the qualifier and then I'd agree though.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Four years of gastrointestinal distress sounds like a good option

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Well, it's either that or the cruise ship ...

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fear has been successfully commodified.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Always has been, friend

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago

Of course, the solution to elect the dumbest person on the planet twice is to pollute the planet as much as possible. These people are the fucking worst.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People that can afford 40k a year on this and can work remotely if they even need to work at all don't need this option. They could move to literally any other nice country in the world.

Poor factory worker schmucks like me need a way out and it doesn't seem like there is one :/

[–] whithom 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just pay for a month and take over the ship.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] whithom 2 points 1 month ago

We won’t run out of food if we eat them.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

NGL, I hate cruises so much I think I'll chance it with the dictator.

[–] whithom 8 points 1 month ago

I’m gonna be puking and shitting myself anyway.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

It's like going on holiday to a warehouse surrounded by water.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Worst vacation ever. Plus we were on the cruise before that carnival ship got stuck in the Gulf. We ended up in progresso instead of Cozumel because the previous outing was behind schedule.

Reality is that bucket was running on one engine for weeks and the other gave out.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure this is the prequal to snowpiercer

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn’t the Venn diagram of people who didn’t vote Republican and people who enjoy cruise ships just two disjoint circles?

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

That’s the probably the angle.

“His do we get entice people who hate cruise ships to get on a cruise ship?”

“Point out that, unlike democracy, it’s a boat that Trump can’t sink?”

“Hmm… you may be on to something…”

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

There are plenty of horror stories regarding long term cruise living. No thanks.

[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

it would be pretty funny if they all came back home at the end of 4 years and suffered massive culture shock, because we all know the chaos won't end with his term. at least I'm stuck here so i can ease myself into this new hellish reality gradually.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Did diarrhea and CO2 write this?

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

I think this beats the JoCo Cruise as the most appealing bougie cruise, in my head.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

The Titanic 2: Electric Boogaloo