Carbon capture is useful for making aviation fuel, and hopefully eventually plastic. But I'm guessing these people were suggesting carbon capture from polluting power plants?
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
Carbon capture has to be the stupidest climate action to ever hit humanity. It's, and I'm not being hyperbolic, completely and utterly useless. We already have a faster, more efficient, nature borne carbon capture, it's called trees. Maybe instead of watering down the deforestation law in Europe, the MEPs should have thought of that.
It's a con, supported largely by the same companies who have already been committing ecocide.