this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
33 points (94.6% liked)

Linux

48178 readers
1477 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
33
submitted 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) by Mwa@thelemmy.club to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

yes i did a os one but i am wondering what distros do you guys use and why,for me cachyos its fast,flexible,has aur(I loved how easy installing apps was) without tinkering.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

EndeavourOS. It's just easy to install and I basically use it like Arch

[–] Dustwin@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 minutes ago

Kubuntu 24.04 because it's a solid desktop and I have nothing against Snap. If it works then I don't care if it's a deb flat or snap. p PPAs were fun and exciting but I broke my system more than once with them back 10 years.

[–] spleaque@lemm.ee 1 points 29 minutes ago

I use Arch with Hyprland because it's great.

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 1 points 54 minutes ago
  • Debian stable (w/ XFCE). No-nonsense, excellent community support, well-documented, low-maintenance, and runs on anything so I can expect things to work the same way across all of my machines, old, new(ish), or virtual
  • Just flexible enough that I can customize it to my taste but not so open-ended that I have to agonize over every last config
  • It's been around for many years and will be around for many more
  • I often entertain the idea of moving to Alpine or even BSD, but I can't resist the software selection available on Debian
[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Kubuntu, because when I got my Vega 56 GPU on release day (August 14, 2017), I had to download the proprietary driver straight from AMD to get it working, and Ubuntu was the only distro supported by both it and Steam at the time. (Otherwise, I would've picked Debian or Mint.)

I don't love Ubuntu (especially how they push Snap), but I can't be bothered with the hassle of reinstalling my OS.

[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No Void here?

Oh well... I surely don't use it because it's popular...

  • Runit
  • Pkg manager
  • KISS
  • Up to date / rolling distro
  • But stable
[–] tomatoely@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I went into void as my first DIY distro, mainly because I wanted to mess around with window managers and it was a very good experience. Runit made my underpowered laptop boot into linux in like 4 seconds, crazy fast. XBPS package manager was always really really fast too. I like the fact that nearly everything you need is in the official repo, instead of having to delve into the depths of something like the AUR. I also managed to make a contribution to the repos with the help of the community on the IRC chat rooms which were very noob friendly. Overall just a solid experience.

[–] Glifted@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Ubuntu because I'm old, uncool, and tired

[–] itmightbethew@beehaw.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Bazzite (with KDE). My desktop is mostly for discord and gaming - I don't have the kind of job that can be done from home. So when I get to use it I want it to just work, and look good.

I've used a bunch of distros and I've sort of become an atomic evangelist. Which put like that sounds like a great band name.

[–] shadow@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 hours ago

PopOS. It was the easiest to get my Nvidia GPU set up and plays all the games that I wanna play without too much pain. I've been meaning to try something like Arch with KDE, something like what my SteamDeck is using... but I don't wanna fuck around setting up Arch.

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I like Manjaro

  • I like it
  • Its user friendly if you don't want to spend a month fiddling with it
  • Feels comfy and relatively lightweight
  • If you are living on the edge of latest and greatest versions, it can be a pain to wait for official repos to be updated. Though I only noticed this problem with Discord desktop app, however since I realised that it spies on every process that runs and you cannot turn that feature off. Uninstalled. Problem gone. Happy me.
[–] morkyporky@suppo.fi 1 points 2 hours ago

Devuan because I don't like systemd

[–] Breadhax0r@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I started with mint cinnamon and then tried out bazzite and nobara but they both gave me issues so I'm back to mint because it really does "just work"

My server is running mint currently, but I'm going to switch to fedora at some point soon. Mostly because I have to deal with RHEL at work and I'd like to better familiarize myself with it.

[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Linux Mint, because I don't like to tinker with the system, I like good defaults (and Mints has them).

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 6 points 6 hours ago

Yk what I LOVE THAT, Why i liked linux mint when i was new.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

Debian and derived is my go up generally, stable and I like apt, great out of the box on every machine I've used and personally found pretty much everything I want to use or run has debian and Ubuntu explicitly called out in their setup documentation. I use Ubuntu server a lot for work, I'm comfortable with it and it's supported in every cloud environment I've touched. Debian on my laptop, bench machine, armbian on my 3d printers, Ubuntu server on my home server (though I kinda want to move that to debian too, just lazy and it works)

I've got arch on my desktop, could have probably gone for debian unstable, but figured I'd go for it. I use aura for package management. Linux is linux though, be real that I personally don't find much of a difference beyond package management.

[–] subiacOSB@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Debian on most my machines. Can’t trust commercially backed distros any more. I’m tired of chacing cutting edge stuff. Like things to just work.

[–] letThemPlay@lemmy.one 6 points 5 hours ago

Previously arch now NixOS, just love the reproducibility.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 5 hours ago

I have Bazzite on a laptop for the ease of use and general resistance to breakage, and Spiral Linux in a VM. The latter works flawlessly that way, like it was always meant to be in a VM.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 10 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

EndeavorOS. Because I wanted to have a rolling release distribution that is always up to date, and one that is good supported by maintainers and community. Good documentation is very important to me. And I trust the team behind EndeavorOS and Archlinux.

Also the manual approach of many things and the package manager based on Archlinux is very nice. I also like the building of custom packages that is then installed with the package manager (basically my own AUR package). The focus on terminal stuff without too much bloat by default is also a huge plus.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gramgan@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago

NixOS because it’s easy to understand—I can pop open any .nix file in my config and see exactly what is being set up, so I don’t have to mentally keep track of innumerable imperative changes I would otherwise make to the system, and thus lose track of the entropy over time.

[–] m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Gentoo because I like it.

And portage.

[–] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (9 children)

Fedora Silverblue

  • I like Gnome
  • I like that Fedora adopts new technology quickly
  • I like how it makes updates more reliable
  • I like flatpak
[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 3 points 5 hours ago

I use the Bluefin flavor of Silverblue. I like not having to tinker with my laptop to keep it working, everything happens in the background.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

mint cinnamon because on my system it has no major issues and everything is easy to configure. i don't have a lot of spare time so i can't spend hours or even days troubleshooting why something won't install or run. most other distros have been annoyingly buggy or too difficult to set up.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)
  • Debian + Xfce on the desktop, because it (mostly, see below) just works, it's snappy, reliable, and I don't need my apps being constantly updated (I have very simple needs and use cases)
  • Mint + Cinnamon on the laptop, because it's still debian-based and because unlike Debian, Mint was able to connect my AirPods out of the box and I use them a lot when on the laptop... I also quickly learned to appreciate Cinnamon, I must say.

edit: typos

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yirsi@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Arch because it helped me understand the os better and i like tinkering. Also pacman and the aur

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itchick2014@midwest.social 4 points 5 hours ago

Arch. I had some tinkering with other distros in the past but wanted to configure pretty much everything. Running it with Cinnamon. I love pacman and AUR and have been able to not break it so far after a year of being installed which is a new record for me 😂

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

After quite a bit of agonizing, I eventually landed on openSUSE Tumbleweed. I chose a rolling release distro because on my desktop I want to be up-to-date. Having used Gentoo a long time ago, I didn't want a distro that takes effort to install and set up. openSUSE is somewhat popular with an active community and decent documentation in case I run in to issues. I also considered the fact it's based in Germany, because EU has at least some decent privacy laws. I was put off by the fact its backed by SUSE, but that's a two-edged sword.

Right now I'm content with Tumbleweed, but I'm keeping an eye on OpenMandriva Lx if I feel like switching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ubuntu for my servers, and Linux Mint for my Workstation.

I grew up using Debian-based distros, so it's what I'm comfortable with. I like how Mint seems to "just work" most of the time, especially with samba shares and usb peripherals.

Ubuntu server is primarily because it's incredibly easy to get support when you need it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] airikr@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I use EndeavourOS Xfce because it's Arch with pacman and not Flathub or Snap. Plus, I love the simplicity and the performance boost you get with Xfce (even if it's a small boost with a modern gaming PC).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Pop. I just need ubuntu without snap, distro's default look doesnt matter since I'll just use sway/i3wm.

Though the fact that they're building their own tiling DE could make me stick with it fully when it comes out.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

NixOS for most things, Debian on some servers as a docker host

[–] neo@lemmy.hacktheplanet.be 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting. I’ve using NixOS many years on servers but recently also started using it as a base for docker hosts. Before that I used Ubuntu or Debian for docker hosts, but I figured out I still like the declarative approach even for simple servers like docker hosts. There’s your basic security config, ssh keys and monitoring setup that I used to do imperatively, but I much rather have declaratively now, no matter how small. And enabling docker on NixOS is just a virtualisation.docker.enable = true; anyway.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Oh I know it's better, problem is I host some stuff my friend group relies on so I don't want downtime while I figure things out. Also, it's a bit of a pain in the ass to get NixOS set up on a VPS without native support (I'm on Hetzner and I know it's possible, it's just a bit of a hassle). It's one of those projects that I'll get to eventually, when I got time. Or so I tell myself

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

I recently started using compose2nix, and I'm enjoying it.

https://github.com/aksiksi/compose2nix

[–] LastoftheDinosaurs@reddthat.com 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I use NixOS, Gentoo, and Debian:

  • NixOS because I like declarative configuration files.
  • Gentoo because I enjoy compiling from source.
  • Debian because the other two are more difficult to use.
[–] neo@lemmy.hacktheplanet.be 1 points 3 hours ago

Technically NixOS is all compiled from source too (if you disable the binary caches). It has since taken away Gentoo’s raison d’être a bit in my head. Debian still holds a special place in my heart too, for its simplicity and stability!

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

CachyOS. I use it because I am a fan of Arch based systems, rolling releases etc, but CachyOS is optimised for my generation of hardware, and has lots of good default configurations for various apps. They have a customised proton version, a good default fish profile etc.

tl;dr It's Arch, but optimised, and slightly more pre-configured out of the box.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Garuda for me. The reasons are similar; just replace some optimization with some convenience. It's a bit garish by default but pleasant to use.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›