this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
535 points (97.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2614 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former CIA Director Leon Panetta warned that Trump’s return to the White House could embolden Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, giving him a "blank check" in the Middle East and increasing the risk of war with Iran.

Panetta expressed concern that Trump would support Netanyahu's aggressive stance against Iran without restraint, potentially worsening regional instability.

Panetta also predicted Trump might allow Russia to retain parts of Ukraine if he returns to office, though he doubted Trump’s negotiation skills.

He criticized Trump’s approach to foreign policy, suggesting Trump would be inclined to "capitulate" to authoritarian leaders, which may not sit well with some Republicans.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lohky@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No no guys, Harris was the one that supports the Palestinian genocide, not Trump!

Fucking idiot tankies.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Bud, they both support it. The difference is that Republicans don't pretend to care about stuff like this.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No, the difference is the extent of which they will enable genocide. And I'm not just taking about Gaza.

It's a massive fucking difference.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

What limits are being imposed on them currently? They're already flattening Gaza, attacking UN outposts, and invading other countries and this is all with our warplanes, bombs and tax dollars.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

At some point some people were even saying Harris is worse than the same. For your sanity, I only hope you don't have family in the Middle East.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Rashida Tlaib's district is a prime example of this, she kept her seat by a wide margin while Dems lost the state. They decided to ignore their voter base and suffered the consequences.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 17 points 19 hours ago

It's pretty normal for people not to vote for someone genociding their family. It's her fault, not the voters. The same way Democrats threw away the votes of the left and Palestinians because they didn't care if they were being genocided is the same logic the right uses to vote for Trump for the economy despite all the damage he'll do to women and other minorities. You're all equally selfish and you don't have the moral high ground when you're supporting a genocide and quieting any dissent on it. People tried to say this could lose her the election, but nothing can be the politicians fault, of course, just the voters.

Anyway, turns out it wasn't the genocide anyway. She lost Michigan because of it probably but it didn't matter anywhere else, and she lost the election before it was even added. You can add up all the third party votes and it didn't amount to shit. It was the economy. It always is. People in fucking rural Pennsylvania haven't been reading hexbear posts or whatever. They just didn't buy what she was selling.

Or course, if it was the genocide, that just proves what the left was saying all along: she's got to do better on this issue or she can lose the election, and she'd rather lose than not do a genocide. Turned out she probably would've lost either way but still, hopefully the next Democrat candidate will do better, or we can supplant the party with a new one that can run an actual campaign. You can keep doing the bullying thing, but it didn't work this election, or in 2016, and it won't work next election either. Stop trying to convince the voters to care about what you want them to care about, and telling them not to care about what you don't care about, and time to meet them where they are.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

We didn't get the Bell Riots but maybe we'll get a WWIII.

Still have my fingers crossed for Irish Reunification this year.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›