this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
536 points (97.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2614 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former CIA Director Leon Panetta warned that Trump’s return to the White House could embolden Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, giving him a "blank check" in the Middle East and increasing the risk of war with Iran.

Panetta expressed concern that Trump would support Netanyahu's aggressive stance against Iran without restraint, potentially worsening regional instability.

Panetta also predicted Trump might allow Russia to retain parts of Ukraine if he returns to office, though he doubted Trump’s negotiation skills.

He criticized Trump’s approach to foreign policy, suggesting Trump would be inclined to "capitulate" to authoritarian leaders, which may not sit well with some Republicans.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

How would that be different than the current plan under Biden?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So the same thing as Biden?

The war with Iran is already on the doorstep of happening under Bidens unconditional aid.

Such a shame Kamala did not get elected. Who also promised unconditional aid and advocated for starting a war with Iran.

Posts like this would have a lot more impact if the Democrats were different.

[–] McDropout@lemmy.world 3 points 34 minutes ago

No Kamala would‘ve saved us! /s

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What is fucked is that no matter what happens. They will insist that it was all the Democrat's fault and all the fault of communists and socialists. They will be believed both despite the absurdity of it all and because of the absurdity of it.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

in reality it was the 20 million voters that abstained from voting this election.

Screenshot_20241108-093218_Firefox

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 points 56 minutes ago

Yeah, because DNC didn't do a spectacularly bad job of fucking up the campaign.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I like how you flipped the script by blaming the group (the voters) and not the individual responsible (the DNC) for making the horrible decisions resulting in an ongoing genocide.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

So you're admitting that you just vote for whoever you were told to vote for?

You just follow along and do whatever the crowd does?

You're admitting that you don't have the mental capacity to identify the threat toward democracy and make the decision to vote for a candidate that isn't a direct threat to global stability?

Let me explain it in a way that a simple-minded individual could understand.

Votes, elect candidates. Votes are given by voters, not political parties.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 minute ago

These arguments are so straw man that they give me hay fever.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

The voter voted in a guy that attempted an insurrection, so yup I think they hold some responsibility here.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

May the people in this sub who screeched Genocide Joe and threatened Kamala over her continued support for Israel get the policies they voted for.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 8 points 3 hours ago

But at least they got join MAGA to own the libs.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I really hope we get the policies of Cornel West. That would be totally awesome. It's why I voted for dude.

Instead we're getting a continuation of Genocide Joe.

[–] graeghos_714@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I believe Putin's power over Trump will prevent anyone doing anything extreme about Iran. Russia has always had an interest in controlling Iran and certainly would not approve the US taking it out.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

He criticized Trump’s approach to foreign policy, suggesting Trump would be inclined to “capitulate” to authoritarian leaders, which may not sit well with some Republicans.

Don't they even know who they picked to represent them?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Libs still have zero self-awareness. Promoting genocide for months in the most condescending and futile manner... Then continuing to blame everyone else after they inevitably lose yet again.

Seriously Trump is a garbage person who would be easy to beat with Bernie, Michelle, etc. But the libs gotta impose their terrible politics on everyone. Gotta shove their genocide down our throats.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 hour ago

Continuing the legacy of Genocide Joe...

This is how dems and republicans work together to push state ever deeper into fascism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratchet_effect

[–] rainynight65@feddit.org 17 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

That should put paid to the myth that Trump is 'the antidote to all the wars'.

I always thought that the argument 'no wars were started during his presidency' was bullshit.

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (12 children)

Waiiiiit, are you saying that not voting Kamala didn't magically stop the genocide in Gaza?????

That it only accelerates it, like I and other people have been saying for months????

WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING?!

[–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 1 points 26 minutes ago

I got banned from a community saying this as calmly as possible XD Idk i feel like theses tankies who were overwhelmingly hostile are either shills or hypocrits who just want to hurt the big bad capitalist, short and long term consequences be damned. (Tankies=/=Leftists just a reminder)

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yep, running two pro-genocide candidates did absolutely nothing to stop the genocide.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›