this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
35 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

1374 readers
398 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Screens sprayed with coffee after techies find Microsoft's latest OS in unexpected places

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The issue seems to be that Microsoft has started to reuse KB#s for updates across different channels, meaning update KB 5044284 (the update in question) can be a Security update for Windows (Desktop) 11, and be an optional OS upgrade for Windows (Server) 2022, just shaeing the same name.

Because that's obviously a wonderful idea with no potential downsides.

That appears to be what happened here, but additionally a mistake was made and the Server patch was labelled with the details (that it's just a security update) for the Desktop one.

Also doesn't help that Microsoft only has one documentation page for any given update number, and the one for this one only lists the details of the desktop update.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

It was a mistake on Microsofts part I think. They don't normally reused KBs.

[–] tomcatt360@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

clap clap "Oh, good. My slow-clap processor made it into this thing."

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I love that I read it in her voice.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Rip to those admins who woke up to a fleet of untested unlicensed servers

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe Microsoft will be giving a discount on the licenses to the affected people

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe they will give them to migrate to Azure

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe we'll find Black Mesa