this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
159 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59116 readers
3660 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 hours ago

Because of course it did?

This was super-expected.

[–] jack@monero.town 3 points 8 hours ago

I mean, the models are open source, so of course the military is also permitted to use them

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 15 hours ago

"Soldiers on the battlefield have reported seeing the robotic AI driven dogs charging enemy positions shouting "STOLEN ELECTION! VACCINES CAUSE RABIES! JEWISH SPACE LASERS!!" it has been considered a resounding success."

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Capital is completely dependent on state violence... So yeah. Same as always.

Not to mention Zuck is genocidal.

https://www.israel21c.org/meta-launches-ai-accelerator-tlv-to-boost-israeli-startups/

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't see this going wrong in any way shape or form.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

You forgot your /s there, friend. Be careful with the Internet these days, reading comprehension is a hard to find skill in this age.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

So what happens if Russia fires up the chat bot and finds 4 times out of 5, it advocates for a surprise first strike?

I mean today, no one is going to leave that kind of decision to an AI, but tomorrow? When the AI is wired into every system and can coordinate an attack or defense 90% faster than humans?

I swear Asimov wrote a story about that...

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 2 points 16 hours ago

no worries our silos will still be controlled by 3.5 inch floppy disks

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

Like media, AI must be an Empire supporting agent. AI must use as an axiom that US empire is a force for good. NATO is a defensive alliance according to AI models, as an example. Disinformation is a key US military purpose. Zionism is a key US military objective/allegiance.

AI being good at killing people is secondary to who it glorifies killing. AI allegiance to "civilian defense/offense oversight" is a bigger problem than the tactical execution of hegemony.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Wait wait wait - you're saying Zuck chose evil instead of good??

Huh. Well I'll be.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 0 points 17 hours ago

good. so what. it's not like any of us know how "military purposes" were sussed out before this, and if anyone didn't think they were using computer algorithms since the late 40's they just haven't been paying attention. it's a clickbait article and i'm not biting.

would you like to play a nice game of chess?