They're starting clumsy and idiotic, but this is going to be a shitshow of an election cycle coming up here...
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
145 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
59402 readers
2524 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
so these are practice runs then …
I interpret it more as hastier people doing a sloppier job. More sophisticated people will produce higher quality, but won't feel as great a need to jump in so rapidly.
"Researchers, platforms, advertisers, government agencies, or other institutions interested in accessing the full list of domains or want details about our services for generative AI companies can contact us here"
I thought I was going crazy because I couldn't find this list of websites. Fat lot of good this article is.
Whenever I see unknown news sites I check bias metrics for them first, like: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsguard/
If that doesn't work out, then I check for things like an about page or similar to find out about the owners, or the authors pages if they exist. A lot of those fake sites don't have any of that usually, or provide very generic information, like an example text they copied. I think generally it means people need to be more trustful with vetted news sources and be more mindful not to believe every bullshit presented to them on some random ass website. This was always the case on the internet, and is even more true now in the age of disinformation.
My starting assumption is that almost everything I read online is either misrepresented or totally untrue.
If I don't recognise the source I assume there's a high chance it's bullshit. If I recognise the source well, I still assume there's a chance it could be inaccurate.
we need some type of adblock filter for these sites asap, and no I am not volunteering free labor :)