Who are we?
We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.
We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.
-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread
thanks for the reminder! recently I keep the warrior down because my amount of ram started to be a bottleneck to me, but certainly manageable when there's urgent need.
why don't they switch the "current project" selection to it, though? It's on telegram now. it would receive more help because that's the automatic choice
I've started a few warriors, but it's not helping because they've activated rate limiting. I just get:
Tracker rate limiting is active. We don't want to overload the site we're archiving, so we've limited the number of downloads per minute. Retrying after 240 seconds...
So the bottleneck is that they don't want to overload Veoh.
Yeah, that's what I'm getting now, too. Hopefully they take the deadline into account for rate limiting... Still good to have warriors ready to retrieve, I guess.
They are about to double the rate lmit, so it should be a little better...
I tried getting the warrior to work with Hyper-V. But that doesn't seem possible or feasible.
Why does warriorhq link to warrior version 3 when there's a successor version 4 available?
Not sure. They don't mention 4 being in beta or anything. Though they don't list much advantage of using it over 3 either.