this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
107 points (96.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13505 readers
1206 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Disclaimer since based on my last comment i know the accusation is coming: i voted for claudia already. I think socialists should vote for Claudia if shes available.

I just also think voting is not the ultimate expression of politics and doesnt mean that much. The "its an endorsement" thing is true, but one extra endorsement does not equal one extra dead Palestinian. Thats just magical thinking. (Also, ive tried telling people the endorsement thing because its what changed my mind about lesser evilism, it doesnt work.)

And the idea that every Kamala voter is horrific evil when many are scared, propagandized, gaslit marginalized people doing what they think they need to do to not die is misguided. You guys claim to be the ultimate propaganda understanders but dont seem to understand its power. Are people still responsible for their actions? Sure. Does a vote of all things matter as an action all that much? Lmao fuck no. Its basically pointless.

Like ive actually talked to liberals about their vote. I didnt even have to touch grass to it! Where their coming from is wrong and ive told them that, but ive seen the effect the lesser evilism propaganda has on their mind. they are not coming from a place of evil with their choice Hating, "not forgiving", or throwing in the pit (as ive seriosly seen suggested) the 10s of millions of people who will vote Kamala in November is simply not practical. You cant hate humanity to that extent and organize. And you definitly cant desire to kill that many people lmao.

Also, most of you are ex liberals. Meaning most of you have endorsed war crimes with a vote. Probably worth keeping in mind.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 65 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Many of us like to ask ourselves, “What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or Apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?” The answer is, you’re doing it. Right now.”

[–] Firstnamebunchofnumbers@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Yea, because we got shit to lose

People dont go out and start shooting unless they feel like theyve got nothing to lose

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's why porky-happy has been refining the art of taking things away slowly.

Theyre very good at it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they are not coming from a place of evil with their choice

they're making the conscious decision that murdering Palestinians is okay if it benefits them personally

[–] miz@hexbear.net 44 points 1 week ago

when people show you they don't care about genocide, believe them

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nobody is immune to propaganda, yet the effect that propaganda has is overstated here IMHO. Read Masses, Elites, and Rebels. If a cis white lib is saying they're voting L3Harris out of fear, they've really just been granted moral license to not care and are using that moral license to justify doing the same thing they would be doing if no pressure was applied to them at all.

I think yelling at libs about voting is effective because the vast majority of them are not joining orgs, they're not communists that are just doing this one thing wrong, etc. They're libs! And they perceive voting as the singular most important political action (especially since the George Floyd protests have been memory holed). If we can radicalize liberals' understanding of voting, we can radicalize their entire politics. I know that because when I was a liberal myself, the first piece of theory I read was Bourgeois and Proletarian Democracy. After I read that, I radicalized very quickly, because my whole understanding of politics was based on voting for the right candidate and it was quickly shattered. So I believe that electoralism represents an attack surface for the left to exploit, since it has become the singular focus of the rank and file liberal politic.

All that being said, at some point it probably is worth shutting up about voting and just focusing on getting people to learn some useful skill, get organized, and agitate as many other people as they can to do the same. It would be really, really stupid if, for example, this whole site alienated a ton of its own already radicalized users over voting. It would be even worse if the same happened at unions and the DSA. It ain't that deep.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

You have to meet the people where they are, and right now that's the polling place.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I feel like a lot of these callout posts that are definitely directed at specific people would be solved with the understanding that everyone on here understands the difference between Hexbear and real life and that rhetorical hyperbole exists as a means for commiseration and venting. Does it occasionally get a little extreme on here? Sure. Should you be concerned that we're all baying for blood in the streets? Nah.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] REgon@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Calling it now what-time-is-it

I will stay out of it, except for this comment.

I think I get what you're trying to say, and I don't entirely agree. As you've said it though I think I disagree a lot instead of just a little. I think presenting it as "1 vote =/= 1 dead palestinian" is flawed and a bit ghoulish and does you no favours. Likewise I think presenting yourself as a grass-toucher as opposed to those that disagree with you as being not-grass-touchers likewise will do nothing but inflame something that could otherwise give you a good and productive discussion, which I think is what you aim to do. As someone who is proud of being able to talk to liberals, I am a bit bemused that this is how you would phrase yourself when in discussion with comrades. Surely you yourself can see how provocative you are being?

I think that while voting normally does not significy a lot about morals due to people being surrounded by capitalist propaganda, this vote does, due to the fact it requires the voter to somehow rationalize accepting genocide (yes I know the rationalisation is "trump is worse", but I've got a lot of hangups with that.)

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i-think-that I think that the primary contradiction of Hexbear is grass touching vs non-grass-touching and the openly inflammatory stance and ivory tower browbeating attitude towards anyone who is perceived to land on the opposite side of that dialectic is Very Good

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that the primary contradiction of Hexbear is grass touching vs non-grass-touching

There's a blurry line of performative grass touching that makes that contradiction hard to read sometimes, which is "the person I disagree with and don't like must touch grass which will banish their bad opinions," which is technically if temporarily true because if that magic phrase worked, the bad opinion haver becomes absent for a time.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

/srs That's exactly my point, if you're on this site you're already not touching grass lol. The fact that a huge number of our struggle sessions are based on that contradiction is ridiculous because being on this site already proves you're way more online than you seem to think you are.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh, I see now.

Yeah, whenever "touch grass" is said as a thought terminating cliche it's almost always from another power user that just wants to stand alone on top of posting hill.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A certain mod on chapo gave me a temp ban with "touch grass" before deleting not only my posts in the thread, but unrelated posts I made that day because I lost my patience with them wanting to shoot people over property.

Much easier to stand on the hill instead of doing the self-crit about why there was a need to kill strangers or how that rhetoric results in kids getting shot because they rang the wrong doorbell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] REgon@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Okay this is my last comment in this thread, I swear. It almost doesn't count, it's just an addendum to my own comment really sweat

I agree. It's kinda comical how we can objectively mock the "I depicted myself as the chad and you as the soyjack" tendencies of other online forums, but then immediately revert to "I have depicted myself as the grass toucher and you as the online weirdo" arguments. It's the worst when people start listing their leftist credentials (at least one of our mods is heavily active in organising lots of direct action stuff, so it's not like being online has lots of correlations to being able or unable to do other stuff.)
There's been quite a few discussions related to this tendency. Early chapo had a group of users who were miffed at the crass tendencies of the website, because it ruined what they saw as fertile grounds for organizing more serious things. It was from this group the "we need to distance ourselves from chapotraphouse" idea came from, as far as I am aware anyway.
Personally I don't really see the website as anything super serious. The biggest potential it has is as agitprop and I think it would be cool if it could grow in size and influence, but I don't think that has a lot of relation to wether or not we have a comm called chapotraphouse... This got away from me, I forgot to take my ADHD meds this morning. I hope this was somewhat coherent.

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

I'm of two minds about this and while I agree with you mostly I do take a bit of an issue here

Like ive actually talked to liberals about their vote. I didnt even have to touch grass to it! Where their coming from is wrong and ive told them that, but ive seen the effect the lesser evilism propaganda has on their mind. they are not coming from a place of evil with their choice Hating, "not forgiving", or throwing in the pit (as ive seriosly seen suggested) the 10s of millions of people who will vote Kamala in November is simply not practical. You cant hate humanity to that extent and organize. And you definitly cant desire to kill that many people lmao.

I don't think anyone is serious about wanting to kill all libs, I can't speak for everyone but when it's coming from me it's clearly hyperbole because I'm just yapping

I think libs should be treated as individuals, there's a nice old boomer lady who feels genuinely scared of another Trump term who I'm completely kind and civil to because she's out with us every week protesting the genocide, I can see that she genuinely cares and we don't try to vote shame each other

Now on the other hand that old boomer dude I've never seen before who showed up at our protest last week to campaign for Holocaust Harris and vote shame us got none of that kindness or civility from me because he didn't fucking deserve it, frankly I regret not being a bigger dick to him

Online it's the same way, if they're trying to scold us I'm going to tell them how I feel and I'm going to tell them that there's blood on their hands

You are right that it doesn't matter

[–] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

they are not coming from a place of evil with their choice

except when they are, ie, when they're white and benefit from the white supremacy that undergirds the whole Election Spectacle, whether they're willing/able to acknowledge that or not

otherwise good post

Death to America

[–] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This ignores that the average USAmerican will let their country murder millions of foreigners if it meant their grocery prices went down by 10 cents

[–] miz@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

Kamala openly said that at the CNN town hall. paraphrasing but it was basically "murdering kids is bad, but what about murdering kids and your grocery bill got 8% smaller". she might have even directly mentioned the price of eggs? my memory is blurred by a red mist

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

I think it's worse in-person than online, even. Most of the pro-zionist libs and reactionaries I've met IRL have even worse takes than libs online. Just look at how many of them supported the Iraq War and Vietnam or how they ignored Obama drone striking weddings, hospitals, and schools in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Even with the benefit of hindsight, they'd vote Obama for a third term if they could.

Americans turn into the most rabid of fascists when it comes to foreign policy.

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You cant hate humanity to that extent and organize.

I don't hate humanity, I hate people who want to officially cosign a modern Holocaust.

Legitimate question, would you feel this way if someone told you they hated German Nazis who lived in and supported Germany during and in the lead up to WW2?

Because the moral calculus is identical.

We're talking about people who support the modern equivalent of Hitler.

[–] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

moral calculus

There’s your problem. Marxists are not moralists. Westerners are all already complicit and voting is meaningless. What matters is doing whatever is practical to actually support Palestine.

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Being kind to tryptamine was not going to help any Palestinians.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The US presidential election is a sham election even by the standards of bourgeois elections, so voting doesn't matter in the end. But just because it's meaningless doesn't mean it reflects well on someone who casts their ballot for the current genocider. It's like if someone upvotes a reactionary comment or post on Hexbear. The impact is practically nil, but they still would need to be reeducated and banned if they refused to self-crit. A major moment in the history of this website is transphobes getting banned for upvoting transphobic content. Imagine if they tried pulling some "uh aktually, this is a niche website. There's no material impact for my upvote. It doesn't meaningfully combat transphobia" excuse.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RobertAnderson2@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

Are you serious?

[–] AFineWayToDie@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

I don't mind people voting for liberal candidates if they're otherwise struggling, lost, and/or confused and need to feel like they're doing something, for lack of understanding of the nature of organizing collective action. If it's a little peace of mind, okay, they deserve it.

What offends me about electoralism are the people who speak of the act of voting in moral terms.

[–] Hexbear2@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't care if anyone votes or not, it won't change anything, but a protest vote is better than no vote, in my opinion. Voting for a leftist is a chance to voice your dissent and not remain silent. If Harris loses Michigan because several thousand vote for third party leftists, then our message has been sent.

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Agreed. No one has to vote, but refusing to vote has never been an effective strategy for dissent. Ideally, vote PSL. But honestly I don't give a fuck of you hand it to your toddler with a crayon and have them pick. It's the organizing that really counts

[–] millennialstealthcamper@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I ran into someone recently who was all smug about voting, asking me, “Did you vote?” Yet, he was completely unaware of the local ballot items. This is due to the stupid national campaigns that emphasize just showing up to vote without understanding the stakes at the local level. No local organizations were strong enough to educate him on the harmful propositions, showing just how unorganized the left is. We’ve all seen good local efforts get crushed by capitalism, and even sensible ballot votes get overturned by state legislatures or vetoed. I recognize that there’s no winning through pure electoralism alone and that non-swing state presidential votes do not matter. If you’ve got time, maybe it’s still worth voting on down ballot stuff and following advice from your best local leftist org.

[–] LigOleTiberal@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

yeah but then how can I virtue signal and feel righteous all day long online?!?

they are not coming from a place of evil with their choice

To the pure, all things are pure

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I thought this was already pretty clear. The “lesser-evil” mindset is strong and so is the propaganda supporting it. I’m not going to get mad over someone voting Kamala as long as they aren’t a shit head about it.

But agitating is raising awareness and so continuing to pressure is good imo, even if some get a little overly zealous about it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] D61@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Might need to start shifting from using the term "voting" to "electoralism" instead.

Maybe some of these libs will learn the difference.

[–] Jelamzer@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hexbear on people with bad views on forgein policies: i can fix them

Hexbear on people with bad domestic policies: scum of the earth

load more comments
view more: next ›