this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
515 points (97.4% liked)

You Should Know

33109 readers
830 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So I went to check in online, and it asked me to check some boxes for what luggage I wanted to bring on board. I did, and it told me that to carry on both a backpack and a roller bag it’ll be $45, or $65 if I try to play games and they have to check stuff at the gate.

I said fuck that, and unchecked some boxes. It said I couldn’t check in without putting a credit card on file, that they would charge if there were any issues and they wound up needing to charge me for my luggage. It wouldn’t let me continue without putting a credit card on file and checking a box that said they could charge me for my luggage, if they felt it was excessive.

I said fuck that and decided to check in at the airport. I threw all my stuff in a backpack to remove any wiggle room, and the kiosk said the same thing. I talked to one of the people, and she said it’s a new policy. I pointed out that I paid for my ticket, she could see I had only a backpack, and I wanted to get in the airplane. She told me to go talk to the guy at the end.

I talked to the guy at the end, politely, and eventually he printed a boarding pass for me. But you should know they’re up to some bullshit.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 141 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Airlines are assholes and they keep getting worse. We’re at the end of the stage of capitalism where things seem somewhat ok sometimes and maybe good if you’re lucky. Everything is going to be awful and terrible to increasing degrees from here on.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Please drink verification can

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shplane@lemmy.world 90 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I stopped flying United when they beat the shit out of one of their passengers and dragged him off the plane

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 78 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

For those unfamiliar with that incident:

On April 9, 2017, at Chicago O'Hare International Airport, four paying customers were selected to be involuntarily deplaned from United Express Flight 3411 to make room for four deadheading employees. One of these passengers was David Dao, 69, a Vietnamese-American who was injured when he was physically assaulted and forcefully removed from the flight by Chicago Department of Aviation Security officers. Dao, a pulmonologist, refused to leave his seat when directed because he needed to see patients the following day. In the process of removing him, the security officers struck his face against an armrest, then dragged him – bloodied, bruised, and unconscious – by his arms down the aircraft aisle, past rows of onlooking passengers. The incident is widely characterized by critics – and later by United Airlines itself – as an example of mishandled customer service.

[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 61 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"mishandled customer service"

That is not the appropriate term for what happened!

[–] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Never fly United. And then still pay them when the government bails them out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

did no one go to prison for this??? wtf

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, because United employees didn't beat the passenger up, the police did. That's not even remotely close to the worst thing that cops have gotten away with.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

i thought that wasn't actually police

Following a review prompted by the incident, in July 2017 the Chicago Department of Aviation reported that its unsworn, unarmed airport security personnel were not actually police officers under Illinois law. Their uniforms, badges and vehicles had been "improperly" labeled "police" for historical reasons. It promised that the incorrect insignia would be removed within months.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

United: "Fly the friendly skies"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 67 points 3 weeks ago

Obligatory "fuck United".

They fucked up my vacation a number of years ago and I have since sworn them off. The most generous interpretation of the incident is that I missed an email updating a time change and arrived at the airport after the flight had left. Their next flight wasn't until the next morning. My wife and I were looking and there was a flight from a different airline that would have cost them $400 each to book for us (they wouldn't refund us so we could purchase that separately). The first agent at the counter completely understood our request but simply didn't have the authority to make that decision. So she got a supervisor. The supervisor did that annoying ass thing where they listen to your request and then restate it in objectively different terms to sound unreasonable. In the end they covered a hotel for the night and gave us $550 each in travel vouchers and lost a customer for life. So they ended up paying way more and lost a customer than had they not fucked around from the start. Had they paid the $400 from the beginning, we'd have given them much higher preference on our future flights which have been many.

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 46 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I used to fly united quite a bit and it used to be pretty good. But these days my options for flying for work are united, delta, and southwest and I usually choose delta because they don't charge you for shit and you can have both an overhead carry on and a small bag plus free internet on the plane. In the end they're all shit, but I'm going to pick the lesser of the shits each time. Same reason I have Comcast internet.

[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I use Comcast because I have one choice and it’s Comcast

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 38 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That’s why almost everyone who uses Comcast uses Comcast.

[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You use Comcast because you have 0 other choices

I use Comcast because I have 1 choice

We are ~~not~~ the same

[–] Poach@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

WISP does not count as an ISP. Fucking T-Mobile is not a replacement for Internet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Same reason I have Comcast internet.

You lost me. I was with you right up until that point, but then you went off the deep end.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 weeks ago

As a begrudging Comcast customer myself, allow me to explain. They are the least shitty option because the only alternatives in my area are 5G and Verizon DSL. Verizon DSL has a max download speed less than 1mbps.

So yeah, I use Comcast. And I hate it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Basic economy simply isn't worth it. They nickel and dime you with all the BS fees. And the credit card thing is total bullshit, too. They do it because they want to make sure they have your card on file in order to sell you overpriced snack boxes and charge them to your seat.

Once I had to buy a poor lady some crackers because she was on the last leg of a flight from Asia and hasn't eaten anything, but the stewardess couldn't take her money unless she had set up her CC ahead of time.

I fly United often enough for work that I have some status, so I'm one of the entitied snobs who board first and hog all the overhead space.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Agreed, similar situation for me. United is not for non status travelers.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They also push their credit card with Chase. It has a $99 yearly fee, but gives you a free checked bag and lets you into Boarding Group 2 without needing extra status, which has an okay chance of having enough overhead for a carry-on. If you intend to fly United more than once in a year with a checked bag, but not enough to get status, it can make more sense to get the card.

It kind of sucks to have to play those games, but that's Capitalism.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'll go one further, my employer reimbursed me for the 500 a year united card with the lounge access. It's insane how much easier airline travel is with a quiet place to wait/rest as well as a "free" available passable meal and coffee you don't have to wait in line for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 31 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I refuse to fly domestically anymore just because the TSA is all security theater, I refuse to go through their backscatter x-ray, and I'm not interested in their enhanced groping. I will ride my motorcycle 1000 miles in a single day rather than take a plane anywhere.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They phased out back scatter x-ray like a decade ago. They only use millimeter wave, which doesn't have ionizing radiation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Same. Flying has become such a terrible experience that I refuse to take part in it anymore. With the overbooking resulting in people getting kicked off planes, price-gouging customers, constantly late flights, stranding people without compensation, people packed in so tight that no one is comfortable, lack of cleanliness, constitutional rights violations, stealing luggage and items in luggage, violations of people's bodies...I don't think it's an exaggeration to call it cruelty to the passengers.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Also the planes sometimes fall apart now

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I will ALWAYS get the grope if I avoid the cancer box.

I have a deep-seated fear of the cancer box. I was okay with it - I get x-rays a bit for ongoing Achilles issues - until I learned that when Boston TSA asked the FAA what the risks are of standing nearby it for hours at a time, the response was

No.  We're not telling. STFU & GBtW. 

That's when I decided I'd like to avoid it.

What I've learned:

  • sometimes they're bored and don't wanna do it so they'll wave you through an arch and you're out.
  • don't call it a cancer box to an obvious type-a failed-cop TSA agent or you'll have a discussion you'll want to get out of quickly
  • sometimes they want to be dinks. If you have any shame - not me, ex-army - it may not be comfy to show a dad-bod to the other passengers. Take the hazing.
  • usually they roll their eyes and call the noob over and it's a perfunctory process.

So there.

[–] teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I used to work in a job that involved handling radioactive materials. We had dosimeter badges to track long term exposure to radiation. One pass through the full body scanner at a TSA checkpoint would make the dosimeter badge come back from the lab at greater than monthly allowable exposure. I'll take the grope.

[–] IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

"why are cancer rates increasing?"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 27 points 3 weeks ago

That’s some budget airline behavior. If they want to do tha, they should price their flights accordingly.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 25 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah they've gotten really weird about forcing you to use their app and put a credit card on it constantly. Really annoying.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Its a good thing this hold over from immediately after the attacks on 9/11 happened is still in effect or the terrorist might have won.

Not to hijack the thread but which airlines is least likely to put you on a plane made by boeing?

[–] teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For US carriers off the top of my head, Spirit and frontier are all airbus fleets. Allegiant has one 737 in their fleet I think and is otherwise Airbus. JetBlue and Breeze have no Boeing products. All the big airlines have lots of Boeing products.

[–] cashsky@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

I will walk to where I need to go before I fly spirit or frontier.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Usually European companies prefer Airbus. Lufthansa is usually a safe bet.

US companies? Best of luck.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, they do break guitars...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jrubal1462@mander.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I learned this about United this summer. Except the language they used didn't specifically rule out roller bags, it called them "full-sized carryon". I showed up with a checked bag and a small carryon. The desk agent told me wheels make it a "full-sized" regardless of the dimensions. Fortunately, I was able to stuff a bunch of stuff a bunch of my crap into my checked SCUBA bag, and repack my regs and underwear into the backpack I was bringing anyways.

Note: This was on an International flight so I REALLY didn't appreciate feeling like I was flying on a budget airline.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My sarcastic asshole would have snapped the wheels off the bag if that's the distinction they want to have.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You know what's objectively worst than united, as per polls and feedback?

Every Canadian airline.

We used to have a good one, but they just got bought out by scumbags. It wasn't the one with our country in the name. Now they both suck worse than the other. You don't think that's possible, logically, but you'll find out it's true.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why are you being so mysterious about the good airline?? Are you an rpg npc?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I wish flying was affordable. My girlfriend lives in Korea and it's going to cost her 2k to come see my family in Canada in December. This is nearly double what she paid in 2017 for the same trip, and while it's not prohibitively expensive, it's deterrently expensive

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i don't know how much money it would take to ever get me on a plane again, but it would be a lot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fhqwgads@possumpat.io 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

After having to fly United a bunch of times this summer, they changed the names of the tickets and invented a new "no one wants that" tier.

There's now standard economy which is what everyone's used to and gives you a "personal item" (i.e. a backpack or a purse) and a "carry on item", and basic economy which only includes the personal item. They mention it on their website, but on third party websites its not quite as obvious which ticket you're getting.

It has been a nightmare - on every single flight there's a crowd of people pissed that they aren't allowed a carry on with their ticket, with them having to run halfway across the airport to upgrade their tickets or pay 3x as much for a bag they thought was included.

If you're being charitable, it's a roundabout discount on checked bags to fix the problem they invented by charging for checked bags and then sucking at handling them. Every single flight I took had them asking for people to check their carry on for free because the bins were going to be overloaded, and it seems like they want to incentivize actually checking a bag again.

I started instantly asking them to gate check my carry on (for free) because honestly, the airport experience is way nicer when you don't have to deal with your luggage all the time. If you check 1 bag as a couple you might even save money, and if you're alone it might be worth the difference to not have to worry about only having two pairs of pants on your three week trip.

More realistically they want to normalize having to pay for carry on the same way they did checked bags, and they are trying to sneak around that by starting with only their new BS economy tier. Wouldn't surprise me if they got rid of "basic" and just made carry on a "business class" or whatever amenity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I read that as "United States" and the headline only started to look suspicious with the word "passengers".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alinor@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Haven't there always been rules about only 1 piece of carry-on, and there were limits for its size? It was simply never checked. Resulting in overhead boxes being full because some people brought multiple bags, resulting in some people being unable to store their stuff overhead. They're just enforcing the rules now right? Or has something actually changed?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You used to be able to carry on one reasonable size bag, and they didn’t stress about it because the total load of luggage / purses / backpacks and so on was fine. You could do what you wanted and they’d fly you where you were going.

Then some genius realized they could charge people $40 for checked bags, so everyone started carrying everything on, so it became a problem and they had to start checking everything at the gate for everyone who didn’t feel like paying the $40 extra for no reason fee, which was the majority of people.

This is just the natural end point of that evolution, where they initiate open hostility to the customer and try to force you into paying $45 more than the ticket price and actively fuck with you to try to bully you into submitting to it.

It’s partially the fault of everyone who just goes on Kayak and hits whatever is the cheapest option. That’s what I do, anyway. Or did, until this week, when I learned my lesson about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

They used to say "one carry-on and one personal item" (which included things like a purse or a backpack). On my shorter trips, I could travel without checking a bag under this policy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›