this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1024 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

5173 readers
1462 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chewbaccabra@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Thought it was interesting that no one mentioned Terraform or OpenTofu. Then checked the community I was in.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Disclaimer: I am very drunk

But like idk. I feel like cost going down on physical items makes sense to a point. But I've hosted a few services and that shit got harder and more involved the longer it went on. Maybe that's just a skill issue tho. Love to hear your thoughts

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I got server space pretty cheap recently. There's a lot of competition in that space and they compete on price as well as quality

So whatever performance level you need doesn't cost a lot more than the fraction of hardware lifetime you're buying

"Harder" depends on what services you're offering. Email is hard now; web is no harder (though web sites are as hard as you want them to be), hosting a game server is as easy as it ever has been

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Everyone likes to pile on, but do the costs go down? Cloud isn’t run in a vacuum. You’ve got a data center full of employees keeping the place running. The data center has electricity and cooling costs. The company runs an HR department. The electric company raises prices. The hardware the “cloud” lives on wears out and needs to be replaced. All of these costs involve humans and humans demand annual raises to keep up with inflation. Also, investors that gave you the money to build the cloud and keep it running demand a return on their investment. They don’t just give out their money for free. So, I can’t help but feel this is not an accurate view of the world.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (13 children)

This is kinda flawed. Most businesses need to recoup their investment, and some upfront costs going away is part of the plan to profitability.

I think this guy is confusing all "software businesses" and fortune 100 tech companies.

Edit: there are ton of businesses that make software, don't become unicorns or make billions, that survive on a product suiting some niche. To say "software companies" take crazy margins is stupid. Big tech is the issue, not software (see linux)

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›