639
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 3 days ago

I’m honestly stunned. If you can’t trust rich capitalists, who can you trust‽

[-] nadir@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Politicians!

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I don't trust any of these types. If you haven't noticed by now morally decent people are never in charge of a any large organization. The type of personality suited to claw their way to the top usually lack any real moral compass that doesn't advance their pursuit of power.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 252 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's time to stop taking any CEO at their word.

Edit: scratch that, the time to stop taking any CEO at their word was 100 years ago.

[-] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 114 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The best time was 100 years ago. The second-best time is now.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago
[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

We should never have taken them at their word.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] sketelon@eviltoast.org 55 points 4 days ago

Really? The guy behind the company called "Open" AI that has contributed the least to the open source AI communities, while constantly making grand claims and telling us we're not ready to see what he's got. We're supposed to stop taking that guys word?

Wow, thanks journalists, what would we do without you.

[-] 5dh@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago

Should your disappointment here really be pointed at the journalists?

[-] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Which group of people uncritically magnified his voice and others like it for years? Tech journalism builds the legacies of people like Musk, Bankman-Fried and Altman.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 days ago

People talk a lot about the genericisation of brand names, but the branding of generic terms like this really annoys me.

I'll use the example I first noticed. A few years ago, the Conservative government was under criticism for the minimum wage being well under a living wage. In response, they brought in the National Living Wage, which was an increase to the minimum wage, but still under the actual living wage. However, because of the branding, it makes criticising it for not meeting the actual living wage more difficult, as you have to explain the difference between the two, and as the saying goes, "if you're explaining, you're losing".

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 76 points 4 days ago

When that major drama unfolded with him getting booted then re-hired. It was super fucking obvious that it was all about the money, the data, and the salesmanship He is nothing but a fucking tech-bro. Part Theranos, part Musk, part SBF, part (whatever that pharma asshat was), and all fucking douchebag.

AI is fucking snake oil and an excuse to scrape every bit of data like it's collecting every skin cell dropping off of you.

[-] Rogers@lemmy.ml 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'd agree the first part but to say all Ai is snake oil is just untrue and out of touch. There are a lot of companies that throw "Ai" on literally anything and I can see how that is snake oil.

But real innovative Ai, everything to protein folding to robotics is here to stay, good or bad. It's already too valuable for governments to ignore. And Ai is improving at a rate that I think most are underestimating (faster than Moore's law).

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I think part of the difficulty with these discussions is that people mean all sorts of different things by "AI". Much of the current usage is that AI = LLMs, which changes the debate quite a lot

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 days ago

Martin Shkreli is the scumbag's name you're looking for.

From wikipedia: He was convicted of financial crimes for which he was sentenced to seven years in federal prison, being released on parole after roughly six and a half years in 2022, and was fined over 70 million dollars

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

It's not snake oil. It is a way to brute force some problems which it wasn't possible to brute force before.

And also it's very useful for mass surveillance and war.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 97 points 4 days ago

He is a tech bro. Almost everything he is saying is a lie.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 26 points 4 days ago

*parasite....

Nothing bro about this shit stain..

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Almost everything tech bros say is to boost short term share prices. Any resemblance to the truth is coincidental.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 78 points 4 days ago

Yeah. It sucks I had to be downvoted into irrelevance way back when this clown was first becoming worshipped by the tech bros.

I don’t take pride in patting myself on the back, but I was fucking right all along about this douche.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 60 points 4 days ago

I never took him at his word.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HeIsHarsh@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The time was last year, but better late than sorry.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 4 days ago

Was this not obvious at the very least when his own board kicked him to the curb due to an inability to trust him?

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

The guy that was lying since day one? Why?

[-] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 38 points 4 days ago

not only does he burn through cash, he burns through resources making life worse now for everybody: AI rivals crypto in resource waisting while not contributing at all to any improvements. I fail to see "brighter future" for us through AI as it is energy-intensive, unsustainable endeavor for which we are woefully unprepared both materially (energy efficiency, semiconductor manufacturing/recycling, etc) and psychologically (ethics etc.). Yeah, grand on paper, terrible in reality

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

What is really annoying is that there are a lot of really good data modeling applications, they are just in research areas. Generative AI is absolutely a waste of resources, but a ton of money and energy is spent on that instead of on the applications that are actually bearing fruit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

You shouldn't judge people on appearances.

... but, I mean, come OOON... he looks like a reanimated Madame Tussaud's sculpture. Like someone said, "Give me a Wish.com Mark Zuckerberg... but not so vivacious this time." And he's the CEO of an AI-related company.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

Name a CEO tech bro that isn't a raving douche.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's beyond time to stop believing and parroting that whatever would make your source the most money is literally true without verifying any of it.

[-] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago

Oh I'm streets ahead, I never took him at his word in the first place.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Stop trying to make "streets ahead" happen!

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

Your criticism is so fetch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago

News at 10! It was time to stop taking his word for everything. Quite a while back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KingBoo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Anyone have a non pay wall link?

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

This trick should come in handy pal

12ft.io/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2024/10/sam-altman-mythmaking/680152/

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ironically, your link is broken on Voyager because it doesn’t treat anything before the https as a link. It just leads straight to the normal pay walled site.

You need to embed the link for it to actually work. And even then, it may not work on this comment because it’ll try to route to my home instance due to having a Lemmy.world link for my image.

[-] kinsnik@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

the techbros that think that with sufficiently advanced AI we could solve climate change are so stupid. like, we might not have a perfect solution, but we have ideas on how to start to make things better (less car-centric cities, less meat and animal products, more investment in public transport and solar), and it gets absolutely ignored. why would it be different when an AI gives the solution? unless they want the "eat fat-free food and you will be thin" solution to climate change, in which we change absolutely nothing of our current situation but it is magically ecological

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 16 points 4 days ago

I wonder what this clowns daily PR budget is?

Each one of these fake news stories are generally 15k a pop

Do you remember when crypto scammer Sam Bankman was running thousands daily for years...

Similar vibes here

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
639 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58521 readers
6798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS