92
submitted 3 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

The way voter ID laws like this prevent citizens from voting is generally considered a feature — by restricting ID forms common among the young, such as student IDs, they change the makeup of the electorate to favor Republicans.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Thank you for this explanation, now I understand why everyone is mad about the ID issue.

[-] match@pawb.social 2 points 43 minutes ago

i wish there were some kind of court that would overturn injustices like this

[-] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 hours ago

This, much like gerrymandering, is the point. If you can’t win, cheat.

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Don't more developed countries have voter ID laws than not? It's interesting to see that this is one metric where 'everyone else does this except the US' is not used as an argument for the change that would align the US with the rest.

[-] greenskye@lemm.ee 12 points 1 hour ago

Republicans also block national ID implementations and other methods to make getting an ID easier. So the left correctly calls them out on the bullshit. If we had similar ID systems as those countries, I don't think the left would care.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

Most developed countries implement voter ID laws in ways that do not end up being poll taxes. In Canada, like many other places, there are fees to get a driver's license (not to mention you have to be able to drive) , or a passport. For example, health cards (the modern ones with photos) are valid ID to vote, and are free (there may be a fee to get a new one if you lose one, idk, but the initial card is free). The sum total is that on principle it doesn't cost money to exercise your right to vote.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 27 points 3 hours ago

Most of them have a national ID that everybody gets, not the complex mix of IDs that the US has.

If we had that, and everybody had a national ID as a matter of routine, it wouldn't be a big deal. But we don't, because issuing one would be the mark of the beast or something.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 13 points 1 hour ago

Most of them have a national ID that everybody gets, not the complex mix of IDs that the US has

And let's be clear, the people saying "we must have ID to vote" are VEHEMENTLY opposed to this idea.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Many of those countries also have rules for people without ID. Get someone who has an ID to vouch for you and it's all good. I mean, what fool is going to risk their freedom for ONE vote?

(answer: likely a Republican)

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago

The Plain Dealer - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Plain Dealer:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cleveland.com/open/2024/10/ohios-new-photo-id-law-has-already-blocked-thousands-from-voting-since-2023.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
92 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18973 readers
3627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS