210
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 36 points 6 hours ago

Does discrimination exist in Idaho?

White guy: No

Native woman: Actually, yes.

White guy: loud, angry discrimination

[-] Wytch@lemmy.zip 88 points 9 hours ago

Like a lot of Republicans, this guy needs therapy. And medication. And anger management training.

And to be removed from a position of power.

[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 1 points 9 minutes ago

I vote for a good kick in the teeth with a pair of steel toed boots.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 37 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Can we start at the bottom of your list and work our* way up?

Edit: word

[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

That is how the removal of head from ass works, start at the base and pull outwards.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I like the way you think

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago

The senator is from Lake Forest, Illinois which somewhat ironically was an abolitionist town with several prominent members of the Underground Railroad living there. It has changed a lot since then and now is a wealthy conservative country club suburb of Chicago with barely 1% of its population being black.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Some abolitionists held their stance on slavery not so much because they believed everyone should be free but because they didn't like minorities being present at all, slaves or not, and thought ending slavery would mean they'd get shipped back to Africa, despite many having no direct connection to Africa closer than they had a direct connection to Europe.

Not all abolitionists thought this way, but it wasn't always in opposition to racism. Hell, segregation lasted into the 1900s and there's still a problem with police racism that isn't being properly addressed to this day, despite the anti-slavery side winning over 150 years ago.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Shit take in the first half ngl

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

You mean my take that some abolitionists were motivated by hate or the take of the abolitionists that were motivated by hate?

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 40 points 8 hours ago

ICE should be 100% run by indigenous people.

[-] enbee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 7 hours ago

this makes so much sense. let’s start a petition.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world -5 points 6 hours ago

Lots of "lawless immigrants and anchor babies" in power that should be deported to Venezuela where they belong. Starting with this guy.

[-] Addv4@lemmy.world 57 points 9 hours ago

And best of all, it was because she answered the question of, "Did she think discrimination was an issue in the state? "

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 46 points 9 hours ago

And the dude said it to a native American whose tribe has been in the region for millennia. He's not even a native to the state.

[-] Scurouno@lemmy.ca 22 points 7 hours ago

Yes! The Cooper's Ferry village site in Nez Pearce territory contains the oldest verified evidence of habitation in North America, with dates to 16.5k years ago. There is very likely earlier habitation sites, but they will be difficult to find, and many would have been on the coastline that is now miles out to sea due to sea level rise after the glacial melt.

This buffoon couldn't have chosen a worse group to tell to go back to where they came from... They've been there since the glaciers. What a dense, ignorant and racist waste of space... too bad the constituents think enough like him that they vote this hate into office.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

That wasn't even it. The question was if they thought discrimination existed. Which makes what he did all the more insane.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 7 hours ago

You have to be very shielded and very ignorant to even ask this question. I'm a white dude in Central Europe and I'm well aware discrimination exists, even when I'm not the target of almost any of it. You gotta be in a coma to not realize it.

[-] bazus1@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

It makes more sense when you consider that it's all performative for their base. They're so intellectually and emotionally compromised that they'll act the fool to convince shielded and very ignorant voters that they're "one of them."

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Needless to say, I'm not a fan of this.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 31 points 9 hours ago
[-] themachine@lemm.ee 14 points 8 hours ago

I didn’t feel the need to check.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Very ignorant of him.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 10 points 8 hours ago

Foreman has a history of angrily confronting people in public, and shouting profanities.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

He already said Republican.

[-] CityPop@lemmy.today 4 points 8 hours ago

Sounds about right.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago

KBSU - Boise State Public Radio - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for KBSU - Boise State Public Radio:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.boisestatepublicradio.org/politics-government/2024-10-03/dan-foreman-racism-idaho-nez-perce-candidate-kendrick
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
210 points (99.1% liked)

politics

18973 readers
3627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS