147
Every single day, my eyerolls get harder. I'm pretty sure they're going to roll to the back of my head before the election.
The Heritage Foundation is an anti-American hate group and should be treated as such.
God forbid anyone mentions voting of all things
The Heritage Foundation should fuck off, in my view. Full stop.
"Conservative think tank" is an oxymoron -- and more so the more you think about it. This is a fascism factory.
Stuff like "climate change" or "equity" are such common and broadly used terms they're going to be all over the place. They're boiler plate buzzwords.
It's weird they even think of "climate change" as political at this point. Climate change as a political conflict rather than a simple description of reality seems long out of date.
Not to the RWNJs and their thought leaders. And the thought leaders are going to give climate change the Big Tobacco treatment for as long as they possibly can.
The Heritage Foundation are nothing but thugs.
Trump can't seem to stop talking about fucking windmills can we just send them every clip and news article of that windbag entirely unlabeled?
I know many agencies charge per page to fulfill these requests, so hopefully with the broad scope of this one it will be more than the odious Heritage Foundation wants to pay.
Propublica - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Propublica:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.propublica.org/article/have-government-employees-mentioned-climate-change-voting-or-gender-identity-the-heritage-foundation-wants-to-know
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
147 points (98.7% liked)
politics
18973 readers
3641 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS