509
submitted 1 week ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/politics@lemmy.world

The former President's plan to bring water to the California desert is, like a lot of his promises, a goofy pipe-dream.

In an apparent effort to address the pressing issue of California water shortages, Trump said the following: “You have millions of gallons of water pouring down from the north with the snow caps and Canada, and all pouring down and they have essentially a very large faucet. You turn the faucet and it takes one day to turn it, and it’s massive, it’s as big as the wall of that building right there behind you. You turn that, and all of that water aimlessly goes into the Pacific (Ocean), and if they turned it back, all of that water would come right down here and right into Los Angeles,” he said.

Amidst his weird, almost poetic rambling, the “very large faucet” Trump seems to have been referring to is the Columbia River. The Columbia runs from a lake in British Columbia, down through Oregon and eventually ends up in the Pacific Ocean. Trump’s apparent plan is to somehow divert water from the Columbia and get it all the way down to Los Angeles. However, scientific experts who have spoken to the press have noted that not only is there currently no way to divert the water from the Oregon River to southern California, but creating such a system would likely be prohibitively expensive and inefficient.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

I really tried to give the benefit of the doubt in interpreting the dumb shit he said, but there just is no version of his idiot ramblings that actually makes sense.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No, it's perfectly feasible: the water's on top of the map, the desert at the bottom. Now, naysayers may interject that there are thousands of miles of distance and elevation and mountains and whatnot in between, but I bet our genius Trump already has the solution: pick up the map, tilt it and draw an arrow with a sharpie so that the water knows where exactly to flow.

Take that, "scientists"!

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Dimbulb donnie is just everyone's Crazy Uncle Liberty, and it's been Thanksgiving since about 2015.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 173 points 1 week ago

I guess it was gradual, but when did it become the job of journalists to try and guess what politicians mean when they make statements? Shouldn't the meaning be made clear by the speaker? Right now it seems like its:

Trump: Speaks rambling gibberish saying something about a faucet

Journalists: "It seems like Trump is talking about the Columbia river and here's why that is significant..."

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 137 points 1 week ago

This is what "sanewashing" refers to, if anyone was unclear on that.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

This should be the word of the year, by the way. Someone really, really nailed it with that portmanteau. It perfectly describes what the "liberal media" does all the time with RWNJs like dimbulb donnie.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

Oh I like that term. Will be applying it in my life. Thank you.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“sanewashing”

The media is rightly concern that MAGA will have a fit if they tell the truth so they go full Onion. We have reached the point of, "Idiocracy", but here we are.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The difference is he could be the next president and try to turn whatever he's thinking into national policy, so it's worthwhile to try and dissect what he's saying.

But those experts are also (somehow, still) not really accustomed to Trump's bombastic language. He was like this long before he got into national politics, hyping real estate and business for the market (where it kind of worked). That's a totally different world, where half lies and crazy sales talk are the norm.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

I get what you're saying but they really should just be pointing out that he's not making any sense. Trump's speeches are being treated like Nostradamus' prophesies now. He spews a bunch of nonsense and people make up what they think it means. The guy should be in a home, not on the campaign trail and the media should make that clear to voters.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

The worst part is they nitpick any piberal or progressive candidate on their exact phrasing while translating conservative hate speech into something less horrible.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago

If you support Turmp at this point, you're a fucking dunce.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

If someone ever supported Trump, they're a fucking dunce.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago

In 2016: Maybe it was a funny protest vote "against the system", for memes or whatever.

In 2020: Maybe voters were tricked into believing what he was doing was good or something. Jan 6 should have been a wakeup call.

In 2024: Just take a look at ANYTHING Trump has said, and what he has actually done about it and you should know that he is the least trustworthy guy you'll ever meet. At this point it's delusional. I could have excused it for the past 5 to 8 years but now I can't.

[-] archonet@lemy.lol 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I stopped giving conservatives the benefit of the doubt around the point where the Republican party had every chance, every opportunity to go with any other nominee this year, claw back some sense of decorum... and then they chose the Oompa Loompa again. In 2020, at least it made sense for them to hold on to the incumbency advantage, and in 2016, Hillary was a horrible candidate and it's no wonder she lost.

I stopped giving conservatives the benefit of the doubt in 1980.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 55 points 1 week ago

This isn't an idea, or even a promise. Trump thinks that there currently exists a faucet that could divert the Columbia River, a river he does not know exists and would probably think is in Mexico somehow, and that the faucet is purposefully moving water to the ocean as a way to spite the residents of California going through a water crisis. His only promise is that he would turn said faucet to eliminate the water crisis. Why are journalists ascribing so much intelligence to someone who has consistently bragged that he thinks at an 8-year old level?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Amidst his weird, almost poetic rambling, the “very large faucet” Trump seems to have been referring to is the Columbia River. The Columbia runs from a lake in British Columbia, down through Oregon and eventually ends up in the Pacific Ocean. Trump’s apparent plan is to somehow divert water from the Columbia and get it all the way down to Los Angeles. However, scientific experts who have spoken to the press have noted that not only is there currently no way to divert the water from the Oregon River to southern California, but creating such a system would likely be prohibitively expensive and inefficient.

The fucking sane-washing continues. He's not being poetic. He's not laying out an "apparent plan" that we need to vet with "scientific experts". He thinks there's literally a fucking big faucet up there already as big as a building that "takes a day to turn" and he's the only person smart enough to think of "turning the faucet" or the only one strong-willed enough to kill the smelt for the good of the forests or whatever.

People keep grafting actual concepts onto this absolute moron's imbecilic utterances and giving him a leg to stand on...just fucking quote the asshole and move on with your day.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

The ag lobby told him there's an ocean of fresh water, and the only thing stopping it is all the evil librul greens demanding they protect the mosquitos or something.

The farmers in the central valley believe the same thing, they get 80% of California's water and still fervently believe we're all holding out on them and there's a lake superior we've been hiding behind our backs all along out of spite.

[-] baru@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The ag lobby told him there's an ocean of fresh water

I'd say that he just says whatever. If it'll get him more popular and/or more money then there's no need to figure out if he actually believes something or not. It usually is self serving in some way, truth doesn't matter.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Yeah, but does he have concepts of a plan?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nemonic187@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Anyone still supporting this human shaped STD has herpes of the brain.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I disagree. He is not human shaped.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

It takes a day to turn

He really said that

[-] Soup@lemmy.cafe 23 points 1 week ago

He’s a 10 year old child that likes to make pretend without ever having to face any consequences should his little fantasies ever come true.

That’s our job. We’re the ones that face the consequences.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Oregonian, here. We need that water to flush our absolutely gigantic toilet so California can't have it!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 20 points 1 week ago

I love that Trump has no ability to do any critical thinking, and thinks of everything as very literal now. He believes the planes are actually invisible, the only way to prevent Forrest fires is to actually rake the forest, and now that a literal giant faucet would be used to divert water in what kinda sounds like a Roman aqueduct to Socal.

I also agree that journalists should not be spinning Trump's word salad, that makes zero sense, by calling them "poetic" and then trying to explain what the hell he is maybe trying to say. He is running to the President of the US, if he can't explain how he wants to use plumbing to divert water from the Columbia river to Socal he should be asked about that over and over until he can articulate that. Journalists doing the heavy lifting of making real ideas out of Trump's babble should be looked down upon. Instead they continue to "both sides" anything left of the far-right.

[-] gnate@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I think he has things explained to him that are drastically dumbed down to give him a chance of comprehension. Then he misunderstands the explanation, and misremembers the entire exchange, and we get the word vomit that has the barest shadow of reality.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 4 points 6 days ago

He is also famous for not listening, because he thinks he is smarter than everyone in the room. He is also rarely held accountable for any of the word salad that he spews like a firehose. He also surrounds himself with people providing constant negative reinforcement of rewarding him like he actually did well, when in reality he functions so outside acceptable for most things. Then couple that with being a classic narcissist and it's not surprising he is basically clueless on almost any subject asked of him.

[-] Mvlad88@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Trump also said: the faucet is made by ACME and managed by my good friend Wile E. Cayote.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago

And we can solve the problem of climate change by going to the opposite side of the sun and turning off the Enormous Fan, thereby eliminating the solar wind.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

What a fucking idiot. The only dumber people are those that believe him.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
509 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18998 readers
4101 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS