this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1712 points (98.6% liked)

Work Reform

10204 readers
203 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As part of his Labor Day message to workers in the United States, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday re-upped his call for the establishment of a 20% cut to the workweek with no loss in pay—an idea he said is "not radical" given the enormous productivity gains over recent decades that have resulted in massive profits for corporations but scraps for employees and the working class.

"It's time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay," Sanders wrote in a Guardian op-ed as he cited a 480% increase in worker productivity since the 40-hour workweek was first established in 1940.

"It's time," he continued, "that working families were able to take advantage of the increased productivity that new technologies provide so that they can enjoy more leisure time, family time, educational and cultural opportunities—and less stress."

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago

For the sake of comparison…

1940 median US male salary was $956. Women earned about 62¢ on the dollar to men.

Adjusted for inflation, that’s about $21,800.

Median US income (overall) in 2023 is $42,800.

You mean to tell me productivity has gone up 4.8x, and I don’t even see 2x the increase in salary.

Put otherwise, if my hours are worth nearly 5x to you, why aren’t they even worth 2x to me?

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

I think he is taking too big of a chunk off. If this were to be phased in with 4-day work weeks at 10 hours a day with 2 breaks could be a starting point. Companies get the same amount of production hours and save 20% on building costs, energy, etc.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Even 32 hours a week with a proportional decrease in pay would be a huge improvement.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

He still supports Biden...The same Biden who forced railroad workers to stop being on strike. Biden who wrote the crime bill that exploded our prison population. Biden who supports every war we're involved in, all of which are illegal. Biden who was in favor of segration back in the day

Bernie had two primaries rigged against him in a row and didn't say anything about it. Speaking as a disabled person, I appreciate what he has to say about a lot of things, but what good is he if he's just going to cave in and do the same shit as the rest of them? He keeps saying that Biden is his friend. Well Bernie has some shitty friends.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Kirkkh@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds great. He should do something about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SargPotTea@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The issue I see with this is the prices of things, if you had to pay some one 40 hours of wages for only 32 hours of work plus having to hire someone to fill that extra hours (if you can even find someone) will mean prices will probably increase.

Don't get me wrong only working 32 hours a week sounds amazing but as someone who works 60 hrs per week and still struggles to pay bills it's not something for me

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›