this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
213 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19096 readers
4809 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I watched this and kept thinking Trumps followers are going to love this because they actually agree with everything he is singing.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They may think that they do. But it won't take long for all of those "politics doesn't affect me so I don't really care" people (who, let's face it, vote for Trump if they vote at all) to figure out just how wrong they are after the GOP dismantles the administrative state.

Suddenly it's going to be:

"where are my food stamps?",

"why is my drinking water brown and smelly?", or, "why don't I have any drinking water?",

"why did that bridge have to collapse while my mother was driving on it?",

"why can't I go outside without my eyes burning and my throat closing up?",

"where is my diabetes medication that usually comes in the mail every month?",

"why can I no longer go out to eat without getting sick?",

"why is this medicine that I've been taking for years suddenly varying wildly in actual dose and lacking in any quality control?"

Etc.

Can't wait to see all the creative ways they attempt to blame Democrats

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"They should have convinced me to vote for them!"

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

That's like when McConnell said Obama didn't warn them hard enough about the 9/11 victims bill after literally vetoing it.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
  1. God is punishing us all for allowing the gays and the trans and abortion to exist, and not mandating bible study in k-12.

  2. General misdirect toward incompetent government bureaucracy being the culprit, therefore we should get rid of more of it and privatize more stuff.

  3. Its all because of private and public DEI hires of illegal immigrants who also don't work and get too many benefits thus bankrupting us

  4. Secret deepstate illuminati cabal runs everything, we need more sweeping authoritarian powers to stop them

1 - 3 basically are the talking points they've used since the 80s, 4 has always been there but is now openly used for about a decade.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah it is just mind boggling how these things can just pile up, and people are able to ignore the cognitive dissonance (or have trained themselves to get rid of it completely).

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Trump: "I want to get a law passed. Everyone tells me, oh sure, it's very hard. You burn an American flag, you go to jail for one year. Got to do it, we got to do it. They say, 'Sir, that's not constitutional.' We'll make it constitutional."

"There's a lot of flag burners who have got too much freedom

I wanna make it legal for policemen to beat 'em!"

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Project 2025" seems like any Republican party platform from the last 20 years 🤷🏻

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No. Maybe for a handful of them, but never on this scale, never this openly, and never this close to actually happening.

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Openly? Party platforms are about as public as it gets!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you actually read Project 2025? There may be a handful of things on there that've been on the GOP's platform, but most of it goes far beyond anything the Republicans have ever stated publicly as policy goals.

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literally read the document? It's there, nobody is stopping you. I'm not going to do everything for you.

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

If you can't support your claim that it goes far beyond a typical GOP platform, don't make that claim.

I pulled up the 2012 GOP party platform and it hits all the notes brought up in the OP's 2025 cartoon, from taking away women's choice to ignoring climate change.