Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
Forever? No. Eventually the sun will engulf the Earth.
But we already use the power of the sun. Hydro, wind, and solar power all come from the sun. There's a post from a few weeks ago discussing it if you care to search. Technically even combustion is solar in origin, since wood, coal, etc. is all from plants that used sunlight to grow.
But "in the palm of my hand"? No, that won't be for a while. Nuclear fusion is still not even net positive in the lab.
You're not wrong about timeline, but it is net positive in the lab: https://arstechnica.com/science/2023/08/physicists-achieve-fusion-net-energy-gain-for-second-time/
TIL! I hadn't heard about that.
We aren't sure if the sun will engulf Earth. Some think that our orbit will expand as the sun gets bigger: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sun-will-eventually-engulf-earth-maybe/
I don't think either of us will find it out, though.
I don’t think either of us will find it out, though.
Well not with that attitude.
The sun is basically just so big that the gravity of all of its outer stuff compresses its inner stuff so much that the atoms of its inner stuff fuse together. When they do, they release an enormous of amount of energy, which is what we experience as the flaming hot sun. This type of reaction, where the nucleuses of two atoms fuse together, is called a nuclear fusion reaction.
In that scene, with Doc Ock, he's talking about building a nuclear fusion reactor, a device that can create that kind of atomic fusing here on earth and collect the power from it. That device would be mimicking the sun by doing one of the things that otherwise only the sun does in our solar system, fuse atoms together.
If we can develop and build fusion reactors, it's long been seen as a holy grail of energy production. The reaction releases a ridiculous amount of energy with basically no byproducts and doesn't require any kind of nuclear or unsafe fuel (and requires 4x less mass of fuel compared to traditional nuclear, and 4 million times less than oil or coal).
That being said, it is extremely challenging to recreate the pressures and temperatures that are inside the sun and necessary for fusion. Right now there is a giant reactor being built in Europe that uses insanely powerful magnetic fields (ITER), and in the US there's a facility that is using lasers to do it (NIF).
Both are promising first steps, but both are decades away from being able to build an actual practical reactor that we could connect to our grid and rely on.
Essentially yes, that is the goal behind solar (both photovoltaic, and concentrated thermal) and wind power.
The problem is that it's not always sunny and the wind is not always blowing.
If we can create a mini sun then we could run it 24/7 which is The simplified explanation of nuclear fusion power.
What is the energy source for the Sun's fusion? Is gravity providing energy?
Edit: I guess not because black dwarfs will eventually exist
Edit2: If I want to accelerate a rocket I need to provide fuel but gravity will accelerate me toward an object forever?
The sun itself is its own energy source. The fusion reactions create energy, but as the elements get heavier and heavier, less energy is emitted. Depending on the size the star will either cool down, or explode violently (possibly forming a black hole). And probably many fates in-between I don't know about :)
You can get energy from gravity by moving something closer to a gravity source, but realistically only to a limit. Gravity gets weaker as you get further away, so you can only get so fast from it before either hitting the object, or being too far to notice the pull.