Trump Faces Renewed Scrutiny Over Allegations of Raping a 13-Year-Old Girl : usa

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 80 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He could Rape a 13 Year Old on 5th Avenue and I would STILL VOTE FOR HIM (because I want Trans Kids to Kill Themselves! And Mexicans!)! Pro Life! Save The Children!

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

A lot of them DON'T WANT trans kids to kill themselves, or immigrants, or whatever.

A scary amount WANT TO DO THE KILLING.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

::: spoiler Save the children for Trump! Stop the immigrants from JD Couch molester!

Trump for Aztec emperor of women's bodies and weirdo party couches! Let's go with the worst president by all metrics in all of US history! Why? Inbreeding! Who? All of us. The problem with kids these days is not enough huffing of leaded gasoline!

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As one ought.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

I mean, I'd expect one to face a little more than "scrutiny," but here we are.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just one? There’s gotta be more. Trump doesn’t strike me as the type of fella that would stop after only raping one 13 year old.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://archive.is/qaJBi

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks hero

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

ƪ⁠(⁠˘⁠⌣⁠˘⁠)⁠ʃ

[+] Nytefyre@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

[deleted]

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now That's Family Values^TM

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Does he actually, though? Haven't really seen this mentioned at all recently from any reputable news source or the Harris campaign.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

led some users to mistakenly believe it was a recent development.

Come on. What about all those CDs in Epstein's safe?

[+] timewarp@lemmy.world -23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It is good to question things but looking into this allegation previously it did appear to be false:

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/08/01/trump-child-rape-epstein/

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except for the allegation by said rape victim who recanted it due to being attacked.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Snopes provides some good information about why the claim is suspicious, but there are also stories by Vox & MSM that go into more detail. Having proof Trump is a pedo obviously helps Democrats, but spreading misinformation because you want to believe it doesn't. Based on everything I've read I think it is a fake claim, but then again I still think Trump is terrible & would never vote for him.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn’t trump a pedo for sure though? He’s been to Epstein island how many times?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

The only proof I needed were his disgusting comments about his own daughter.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

. Having proof Trump is a pedo obviously helps Democrats

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

I see "creep" there, for sure.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It doesn’t help dems. maga doesn’t give a fuck. He could kill someone while raping a kid in broad daylight on camera and they’d still support him. The only this it might do is help put him in jail AND EVEN THAT is spurious. Which is fucking insane.

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly don't care for it as ammunition against him I was always just angry about the idea of it as a whole. If he did and if he didn't couldn't change my opinion of his character as a whole. But he was always chummy with Epstein, is listed as doe whatever # and every single person who took that plane is complacent in something deep enough for jail time.

*edit Epstein stupid phone

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unsubstantiated by Snopes is not the same as false.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"no evidence", it says.

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, unsubstantiated means "no evidence."

As the saying goes, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

"...so really, who's to say they're not eating cats? After all, absence of evidence is not..."

United States | News & Politics